Cops in TX tackle & block desperate parents, while they let shooter rampage thru the school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me get this straight. The Uvalde shooter made it by three armed officers. Then cops barricaded the killer in with a room full of children in a tactical stack. The cops sat safely outside as the killer shot each child? Protect and serve WHO?

Have you ever heard of the fog of war?

Doubtful the cops knew exactly what was happening as the situation was unfolding in real time. It's so easy to sit there behind a computer screen with 20/20 hindsight.

Fog of war did not seem to be confusing some of those parents that wanted to get into the building.

Yeah and they could have gotten shot too and added to the chaos. Clearly mobs running into an active shooting situation will make it better. /s

Never stop amazing me with your stupidity DCUM. Never stop.

The cops were apparently too chickenshit to take on the gunman (geez, he had an AR-15 and was shooting!) and they weren't about to let those damn parents cross their perimeter line! Protocol is protocol! Back the Blue!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If armed trained cops are afraid of these weapons than why are they legal for 18 year olds? This is so out of hand.

Oh no it’s good guys with guns …what a load of BS. What a bunch of liars.

For every AR-15 you need about 10 good guys with handguns. It's not even taking into account effing body armor

Why do policemen always support and vote for Republican politicians who want to put an AR-15 in everyone’s hand—including 18 year olds? I don’t get it at all.

Sure you do. Because they identify more with the shooters than with the ordinary people who are just trying to get through a day without being shot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is why I’m for defunding the police. If they are going to be heartless and weak bastards who stand around while a lunatic is killing kids.

Me too.

[Anonymous]

GOP is GOPing.

Vote them all out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cops want to be militarized until it's time to go fight a guy with an AR-15. Then they stand around in fear, "establishing a perimeter." So heroic!

Policing in this county is so broken.

Violent crime today is about half of what it was 30 years ago.

[Anonymous]

JOe manchin and Kristin Sinema have blood on their hands. They are just as to blame as the Rs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:JOe manchin and Kristin Sinema have blood on their hands. They are just as to blame as the Rs

Name the Rs too then.

[Anonymous]

So an AR-15 is so deadly that even the cops aren't willing to engage. But yet we want to train teachers and kindergartners how to handle those types of situations?
I'm sorry but Our cops even don't want to engage with a gun like this. Why the hell are we allowing anyone outside of the military to have one.
You sure can't use one for hunting. You destroy the meat.

[Anonymous]

HOW was that one exterior door open so he could enter the school

Was the classroom door propped open

What is the story with the first SRO

So many questions

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me get this straight. The Uvalde shooter made it by three armed officers. Then cops barricaded the killer in with a room full of children in a tactical stack. The cops sat safely outside as the killer shot each child? Protect and serve WHO?

Have you ever heard of the fog of war?

Doubtful the cops knew exactly what was happening as the situation was unfolding in real time. It's so easy to sit there behind a computer screen with 20/20 hindsight.

Fog of war did not seem to be confusing some of those parents that wanted to get into the building.

Yeah and they could have gotten shot too and added to the chaos. Clearly mobs running into an active shooting situation will make it better. /s

Never stop amazing me with your stupidity DCUM. Never stop.

The cops were apparently too chickenshit to take on the gunman (geez, he had an AR-15 and was shooting!) and they weren't about to let those damn parents cross their perimeter line! Protocol is protocol! Back the Blue!

If the cops were not going to go in to try the save the kids, then they should let the parents try. Wouldn't you rather die trying to save your kid's life than have done nothing?

[Anonymous]

I would be pro police if they did something. I care about crime. But it is a profession for which there is so much funding/support and yet embarrassingly low expectations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So an AR-15 is so deadly that even the cops aren't willing to engage. But yet we want to train teachers and kindergartners how to handle those types of situations?
I'm sorry but Our cops even don't want to engage with a gun like this. Why the hell are we allowing anyone outside of the military to have one.
You sure can't use one for hunting. You destroy the meat.

Y'all cain't take away mah freedom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:HOW was that one exterior door open so he could enter the school

Was the classroom door propped open

What is the story with the first SRO

So many questions

It's like 90 degrees by 1130am in that part of the country. They probably keep doors open to help with air circulation. A small rural school in TX ("low taxes! business friendly!") doesn't have the money for a badging system with magnetic locked doors.

Do you really think it's normal to keep kids boxed inside small classrooms with no fresh air all day to prevent school shootings?

That's literally the consequences of your argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So unarmed parents wanted to get in there and take on this situation and all those officers with all those fancy weapons that that community bought for them, wanted to stay outside?

The expectation for law enforcement from now on must be that they have to go in and engage the shooter even if alone.

[Anonymous]

How did he get in to begin with??