DHS Creating "Disinformation Governance Board"

[Anonymous]

Wow. As you search for her name onlne, it only gets worse.

https://twitter.com/mazemoore/status/1520077639918264321

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No surprise to me those on the right are against this, however very surprised how many on left agree this is dangerous.

Maybe those on the left should appoint qualified people to lead this.

Qualified in what? What are the qualifications?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No surprise to me those on the right are against this, however very surprised how many on left agree this is dangerous.

Maybe those on the left should appoint qualified people to lead this.

Qualified in what? What are the qualifications?

At least have a PhD, the maturity to not create silly videos of you singing about disinformation, and someone who doesn't live tweet asinine partisan content.

[Anonymous]

Then there’s @LazyLogan, or the man who can’t seem to use Google. There are a lot of lazy people—mostly men—who seem to think women’s purpose on the internet is not to inform others about their expertise, analyze the news, or amplify their work, but to answer inane questions about basic concepts about which they could easily educate themselves.

https://www.wired.com/story/womans-guide-toxic-trolls-internet/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden's Ministry of Truth.

What can possibly go wrong?

Straight out of 1984.

She looks incredibly smug.

She looks like a young Delores Umbridge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow. As you search for her name onlne, it only gets worse.

https://twitter.com/mazemoore/status/1520077639918264321

Omg. I’m progressive and this nominee makes me feel second hand embarrassment 😳

[Anonymous]

Eric Blair shrugs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here's out new minster of truth. A year ago she was making Tik Tok videos. Her account has sense been made private.

This cannot actually be happening. I'm living in an alternate reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thou shall not mock

"Gendered abuse"? How about just calling out a moron for what s/he is? My God. Where on earth did the Biden administration find this loon?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

That's one of the most accurate things I've ever read on this forum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden's Ministry of Truth.

What can possibly go wrong?

Straight out of 1984.

She looks incredibly smug.

I knew she reminded me of someone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it that anyone on the left thinks this is a good idea? It's amazing how much the parties have changed just in my lifetime.

Trump turned the GOP into a huge growth party by embracing the working people and christians … aka Hispanics. Trump transformed the GOP and took the most populous groups from the Democrats. He’s now driving wedges between the Democrats and suburban women. A generational phenomenon.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but Trump has absolutely nothing to do with the topic of this thread. I hope that doesn't come as too much of a shock to you.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

+ a million

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There should be licensing for websites. I do hope this initiative tackles the anarchy and harm that pervades the internet. The technology is so new I can’t see how we shouldn’t reevaluate the purpose the web serves and its governance.

Could you set this to music, Nina?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No surprise to me those on the right are against this, however very surprised how many on left agree this is dangerous.

I'm not at all surprised that LWNJs would seek to tell others what is and is not "misinformation." They might as well simply say anything that doesn't suit our narrative is misinformation. That's what it boils down to. That you support it tells us all we need to know.