Doesn’t Florida have a much bigger death rate though? Even if Covid was only spreading silently through the schools, the kids surely brought it home to their parents and grandparents. |
Oh stop with your pedantic finger wagging. Not everyone is in a position to find that live in nanny or get a family member to watch their children. You are obtuse and obviously out of touch with the realities most families in this god forsaken country live and the challenges this poses to their families, financial security, and mental health. |
+1 And it’s beyond dismissive - it’s just ignorant. |
I don't want to be competing with Florida, frankly. There's a no-win game if ever there was one! |
Hopefully you realize that the PP you responded to directly may not have been (and in fact, was not) the PP who responded with the "big brain genius" post. |
You can have family in the area and still have no options. My mom has a blood cancer that means COVID could easily kill her, triple-Moderna doses and all. And my dad is too cognitively impaired to watch the kids. But, yeah, PP's post is like verbal diarrhea at this point. There are no arrangements, other than those in their mind. |
Eh. I don’t think so. |
It’s a fact. |
The after care programs will operate in the closed schools (thank goodness). Let that sink in. We will once again be paying $1200 a month for the privilege of setting foot in a public school building |
DP, and some kids will, for sure. As I've posted before, I'm more worried about their overall development than specific academic outcomes, although those matter more than many "liberals" want to admit. |
I'm the PP who posted those "cute terms" (and would never blame families for lack of childcare, nor am I cavalier about mental health-- though it's true that I care less about it in a temporary situation with serious competing risks). And I can't fathom how people think that if only MCPS vowed never to utilize virtual instruction, we'd be just fine. You are setting up a world in which, if MCPS pivots to virtual for any reason, they will "not be trusted" to return for months or years. Thus, if they want to keep your "trust" they should only pivot to virtual, when? Never? At 50% positivity? Or would it be acceptable to do so when there literally are not enough staff available to keep the school running safely-- which is not a metric we are far from meeting? The thing is, even if you say there were an acceptable time in your eyes, I don't "trust" that you would not move the goalposts if we reached them. That's largely what's already happened. A couple of weeks ago, most pro-in-person folks seemed to think the 5% metric was reasonable enough. At least acceptable. Not all pro-in-person folks, but seemingly most. Now all that has changed is that we're meeting or exceeding that same metric, and now it's unreasonable. Literally no way to win. |
um yeah. we have friends in miami dade and its a shit show. Lots of multigenerational families and elders getting very very sick. |
| What I don't understand is if it's 14 calendar days why couldn't today count as day 1? Would make sense so kids are back sooner than later in their schools. |
You ask an interesting question. The reality is that red schools should be getting daily updates as to what number day they're actually on. Any day there's a 14-day incidence of 5%, you're technically on day 0 or 1 again. |
Well, no. $1,200 a month for the privilege of having someone care for you kid. |