LCPS - who is behind “Fight for Schools” - conservative PAC trying to oust the School Board?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Because they don’t believe the RWNJ lies? And don’t want to make our kids pawns for political gains? And they aren’t vile POSs?

You mean like their objections to the lack of transparency on the alleged rape at Stone Bridge? Now, that the email from the Superintendent to the School Board proves that they were all aware of it.

Interesting, that the email states that a young girl alleged rape in the bathroom (evidence from a hospital visit supports the allegation) but the police were not called because of that. Why were the police called? Because the dad got angry. Imagine that! A dad getting angry that his daughter was raped.

Who is using the child as a pawn? Angry parents or school administration and school board.

https://wtop.com/local/

So it’s ok to break the law…if you’re angry?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Because they don’t believe the RWNJ lies? And don’t want to make our kids pawns for political gains? And they aren’t vile POSs?

You mean like their objections to the lack of transparency on the alleged rape at Stone Bridge? Now, that the email from the Superintendent to the School Board proves that they were all aware of it.

Interesting, that the email states that a young girl alleged rape in the bathroom (evidence from a hospital visit supports the allegation) but the police were not called because of that. Why were the police called? Because the dad got angry. Imagine that! A dad getting angry that his daughter was raped.

Who is using the child as a pawn? Angry parents or school administration and school board.

https://wtop.com/local/

So it’s ok to break the law…if you’re angry?

And the school called with sheriff within minutes of hearing about the rape.

Stop lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Because they don’t believe the RWNJ lies? And don’t want to make our kids pawns for political gains? And they aren’t vile POSs?

You mean like their objections to the lack of transparency on the alleged rape at Stone Bridge? Now, that the email from the Superintendent to the School Board proves that they were all aware of it.

Interesting, that the email states that a young girl alleged rape in the bathroom (evidence from a hospital visit supports the allegation) but the police were not called because of that. Why were the police called? Because the dad got angry. Imagine that! A dad getting angry that his daughter was raped.

Who is using the child as a pawn? Angry parents or school administration and school board.

https://wtop.com/local/

So it’s ok to break the law…if you’re angry?

I’m sure you’d happily acquiesce if a school tries to cover up your child’s rape.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Because they don’t believe the RWNJ lies? And don’t want to make our kids pawns for political gains? And they aren’t vile POSs?

You mean like their objections to the lack of transparency on the alleged rape at Stone Bridge? Now, that the email from the Superintendent to the School Board proves that they were all aware of it.

Interesting, that the email states that a young girl alleged rape in the bathroom (evidence from a hospital visit supports the allegation) but the police were not called because of that. Why were the police called? Because the dad got angry. Imagine that! A dad getting angry that his daughter was raped.

Who is using the child as a pawn? Angry parents or school administration and school board.

https://wtop.com/local/

So it’s ok to break the law…if you’re angry?

I’m sure you’d happily acquiesce if a school tries to cover up your child’s rape.

Regardless of his reasons, they called the police because of his actions - he broke the law.

Just because you’re angry doesn’t mean you can do whatever you want and not be held accountable. Two wrongs don’t make a right.

[Anonymous]

Regardless of his reasons, they called the police because of his actions - he broke the law.

Just because you’re angry doesn’t mean you can do whatever you want and not be held accountable. Two wrongs don’t make a right.

He struggled with the police. Agree, that was wrong. However, his daughter had been raped and the SB and superintendent had just publicly lied about it. He was attacked and called a liar by a SB supporter. The police came up and grabbed him and he resisted. I agree he should not have resisted. But his crime is nothing to the crime of the SB and superintendent. And, remember, his daughter's attacker has still not been tried--five months later.

And, just weeks before this, on the day of the alleged rape, the police were called because the dad was angry--they were not called for the rape. Had dad not become angry, would the daughter have had the rape test? School wanted to handle it "in-house."

And, you wonder why parents are "bullying" the School Board.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Regardless of his reasons, they called the police because of his actions - he broke the law.

Just because you’re angry doesn’t mean you can do whatever you want and not be held accountable. Two wrongs don’t make a right.

He struggled with the police. Agree, that was wrong. However, his daughter had been raped and the SB and superintendent had just publicly lied about it. He was attacked and called a liar by a SB supporter. The police came up and grabbed him and he resisted. I agree he should not have resisted. But his crime is nothing to the crime of the SB and superintendent. And, remember, his daughter's attacker has still not been tried--five months later.

And, just weeks before this, on the day of the alleged rape, the police were called because the dad was angry--they were not called for the rape. Had dad not become angry, would the daughter have had the rape test? School wanted to handle it "in-house."

And, you wonder why parents are "bullying" the School Board.

So you think the death threats to the school board are … justified?

[Anonymous]

So you think the death threats to the school board are … justified?

Absolutely not. Do you think the threats against their opponents are justified?

[Anonymous]

So, a parent gets upset that the SB lied about his daughter's assault/rape. He did not threaten the SB, but now you want to silence because they received death threats from who knows where.

And, remember, it was member of the School Board who first began the "enemies' list."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

So you think the death threats to the school board are … justified?

Absolutely not. Do you think the threats against their opponents are justified?

Of course not.

So “Fight for Schools” should stop bullying the school board and let them focus on real issues.

[Anonymous]

Oh, like their barrage of "proclamations," you mean?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh, like their barrage of "proclamations," you mean?

Seems like you weren't even paying attention to those:
"a proclamation recognizing October 2021 as Bullying Prevention Month"

I dunno, the bus driver shortage seems important. Too bad they ran out of time to discuss it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Merely filing lawsuits against the school districts, to get policy changed in the name of equity. Though in these cases the elected school boards were eager to give the plaintiffs what they wanted.

Special needs cases? Jeez.

No, it is about affirmative action.

This one?

https://loudounnow.com/2020/09/07/parents-challenge-loudoun-academies-admission-policy-changes-with-lawsuit/amp/

“ Thirty-seven Loudoun County parents have filed a lawsuit asking a Circuit Court judge to determine whether recently adopted changes to the Academy of Science and the Academy of Engineering and Technology violate their constitutional rights.”

You think Soros backed this lawsuit?

This was preceded by an AG investigation of Loudoun County over their admissions policies. Complaint was filed I think by NAACP. TJ in Fairfax, and general county policies were also targeted beyond the particular schools' admissions policies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Merely filing lawsuits against the school districts, to get policy changed in the name of equity. Though in these cases the elected school boards were eager to give the plaintiffs what they wanted.

Special needs cases? Jeez.

No, it is about affirmative action.

This one?

https://loudounnow.com/2020/09/07/parents-challenge-loudoun-academies-admission-policy-changes-with-lawsuit/amp/

“ Thirty-seven Loudoun County parents have filed a lawsuit asking a Circuit Court judge to determine whether recently adopted changes to the Academy of Science and the Academy of Engineering and Technology violate their constitutional rights.”

You think Soros backed this lawsuit?

This was preceded by an AG investigation of Loudoun County over their admissions policies. Complaint was filed I think by NAACP. TJ in Fairfax, and general county policies were also targeted beyond the particular schools' admissions policies.

NCAA filed this?

“ “The inescapable conclusion from the LCPS presentation is that too many Asian students are admitted to the Academies, and LCPS intends to reduce the number of Asian students, notwithstanding the merit of each student,” reads one paragraph of the 16-page lawsuit.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Merely filing lawsuits against the school districts, to get policy changed in the name of equity. Though in these cases the elected school boards were eager to give the plaintiffs what they wanted.

Special needs cases? Jeez.

No, it is about affirmative action.

This one?

https://loudounnow.com/2020/09/07/parents-challenge-loudoun-academies-admission-policy-changes-with-lawsuit/amp/

“ Thirty-seven Loudoun County parents have filed a lawsuit asking a Circuit Court judge to determine whether recently adopted changes to the Academy of Science and the Academy of Engineering and Technology violate their constitutional rights.”

You think Soros backed this lawsuit?

This was preceded by an AG investigation of Loudoun County over their admissions policies. Complaint was filed I think by NAACP. TJ in Fairfax, and general county policies were also targeted beyond the particular schools' admissions policies.

NCAA filed this?

“ “The inescapable conclusion from the LCPS presentation is that too many Asian students are admitted to the Academies, and LCPS intends to reduce the number of Asian students, notwithstanding the merit of each student,” reads one paragraph of the 16-page lawsuit.”

This was later. The NAACP acted first. I don't remember where it was lawsuits, and where it was complaints filed with the AG.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, like their barrage of "proclamations," you mean?

Seems like you weren't even paying attention to those:
"a proclamation recognizing October 2021 as Bullying Prevention Month"

I dunno, the bus driver shortage seems important. Too bad they ran out of time to discuss it.

LCPS school board never runs out of time. The videos posted on their website are truncated because they go so far over their planned time.