Fights at ACHS/TC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now hearing rumors about (unconfirmed) threats of a shooting at GWMS tomorrow. Our kids don’t need this!!

Anyone know what’s going on?!

Perfect example of the absolute trash that mods that page. Total drama queens obsessed with attention instead of providing parents with information. At least a half dozen direct questions going ignored.

They are parents too! Maybe they don’t have direct information or knowledge. How would parent social media page moderators be responsible for answering those questions? You should reach out to the school administration or police.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now hearing rumors about (unconfirmed) threats of a shooting at GWMS tomorrow. Our kids don’t need this!!

Anyone know what’s going on?!

Perfect example of the absolute trash that mods that page. Total drama queens obsessed with attention instead of providing parents with information. At least a half dozen direct questions going ignored.

They are parents too! Maybe they don’t have direct information or knowledge. How would parent social media page moderators be responsible for answering those questions? You should reach out to the school administration or police.

Sorry, NP, but if you don't have anything to share then just don't. It's what the kids call vague posting.

[Anonymous]

The Mayor you voted for:

The mayor thinks it may be too early to say whether the presence of SRO's at Alexandria City High School could have helped prevent Tuesday's off-campus shooting.

"I think it's probably too pre-mature to say that or to form any conclusions from that," he said. "You know, once we learn the details, I think we will be able to understand better whether this in any way could have been or would have been prevented by the presence of school resource officers."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Mayor you voted for:

The mayor thinks it may be too early to say whether the presence of SRO's at Alexandria City High School could have helped prevent Tuesday's off-campus shooting.

"I think it's probably too pre-mature to say that or to form any conclusions from that," he said. "You know, once we learn the details, I think we will be able to understand better whether this in any way could have been or would have been prevented by the presence of school resource officers."

You know that the mayor did vote to KEEP the SROs, right? He was in the minority for this split-vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Mayor you voted for:

The mayor thinks it may be too early to say whether the presence of SRO's at Alexandria City High School could have helped prevent Tuesday's off-campus shooting.

"I think it's probably too pre-mature to say that or to form any conclusions from that," he said. "You know, once we learn the details, I think we will be able to understand better whether this in any way could have been or would have been prevented by the presence of school resource officers."

You know that the mayor did vote to KEEP the SROs, right? He was in the minority for this split-vote.

He endorses and campaigns with all the defunders. Has not lifted a finger to get them back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Mayor you voted for:

The mayor thinks it may be too early to say whether the presence of SRO's at Alexandria City High School could have helped prevent Tuesday's off-campus shooting.

"I think it's probably too pre-mature to say that or to form any conclusions from that," he said. "You know, once we learn the details, I think we will be able to understand better whether this in any way could have been or would have been prevented by the presence of school resource officers."

You know that the mayor did vote to KEEP the SROs, right? He was in the minority for this split-vote.

He endorses and campaigns with all the defunders. Has not lifted a finger to get them back.

Correct. All he is doing here is politicing. If anybody thinks a cop in the vicinitywouldn't have had the effect of decreasing incidents like this, then you are, quite simply, a fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Mayor you voted for:

The mayor thinks it may be too early to say whether the presence of SRO's at Alexandria City High School could have helped prevent Tuesday's off-campus shooting.

"I think it's probably too pre-mature to say that or to form any conclusions from that," he said. "You know, once we learn the details, I think we will be able to understand better whether this in any way could have been or would have been prevented by the presence of school resource officers."

The kid was shot. With a gun. How much more detail do you need Wilson? Do we need to draw you a map?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Mayor you voted for:

The mayor thinks it may be too early to say whether the presence of SRO's at Alexandria City High School could have helped prevent Tuesday's off-campus shooting.

"I think it's probably too pre-mature to say that or to form any conclusions from that," he said. "You know, once we learn the details, I think we will be able to understand better whether this in any way could have been or would have been prevented by the presence of school resource officers."

You know that the mayor did vote to KEEP the SROs, right? He was in the minority for this split-vote.

He endorses and campaigns with all the defunders. Has not lifted a finger to get them back.

Correct. All he is doing here is politicing. If anybody thinks a cop in the vicinitywouldn't have had the effect of decreasing incidents like this, then you are, quite simply, a fool.

x1000 for both of these.

[Anonymous]

How do they not know the shooter yet? Didn’t mcd’s have surveillance?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Mayor you voted for:

The mayor thinks it may be too early to say whether the presence of SRO's at Alexandria City High School could have helped prevent Tuesday's off-campus shooting.

"I think it's probably too pre-mature to say that or to form any conclusions from that," he said. "You know, once we learn the details, I think we will be able to understand better whether this in any way could have been or would have been prevented by the presence of school resource officers."

You know that the mayor did vote to KEEP the SROs, right? He was in the minority for this split-vote.

He endorses and campaigns with all the defunders. Has not lifted a finger to get them back.

Correct. All he is doing here is politicing. If anybody thinks a cop in the vicinitywouldn't have had the effect of decreasing incidents like this, then you are, quite simply, a fool.

x1000 for both of these.

Maybe but Wilson was talking about SROs who were based on ACPS property. There a lot of facts that would shed light on whether the absence of SROs affected the outcome of an event off campus.

[Anonymous]

The considered opinion of EVERYONE familiar with the facts is that having SROs would have helped prevent the event.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The considered opinion of EVERYONE familiar with the facts is that having SROs would have helped prevent the event.

Who constitutes “EVERYONE?” Is it posters on DCUM who assume facts not verified / established?

[Anonymous]

I am confused that you don't understand the word "everyone." Note that "everyone" is qualified by "familiar with the facts," which apparently you aren't. Stop being a smart aleck and obfuscating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am confused that you don't understand the word "everyone." Note that "everyone" is qualified by "familiar with the facts," which apparently you aren't. Stop being a smart aleck and obfuscating.

No (1) I am pointing out that all the relevant facts are not known, (2) I have no idea who these people are who are “familiar with the facts,” and (3) I have no idea if those people, whoever they are, have the same opinion as you.

[Anonymous]

Then just wait. It will all be public eventually. Let the APD do their jobs and stop trying to politicize this unfortunate event.