Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is video of these guys actually picking Charlie up, soaked in blood. That part seems to be conspicuously missing. When they rush up to try to ‘save his life’ presumably stepping in pools of Charlie’s and then lifting an over 6ft 210+lbs dead weight man soaked in blood.

Exactly why are you perseverating on this? Why is it so important to you to see his body, or others, soaked in blood? What are you trying to prove? Or, are you just someone who loves to see the suffering of others?

Aren’t you mad at the FBI for screwing this up? If you want justice for Charlie, how can you not see the problems in this pic, the screwups, the texts as major red flags? It’s wild to me.

I see nothing wrong with the investigation. They have an incredible amount of unimpeachable evidence. Forensic evidence. DNA evidence. Digital evidence. And, they also have the testimony of the killer's lover. They have done a damned good job. I hope they don't accept a plea deal from Robinson. He needs to go to trial and be convicted. And, he will be. The evidence is overwhelming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is video of these guys actually picking Charlie up, soaked in blood. That part seems to be conspicuously missing. When they rush up to try to ‘save his life’ presumably stepping in pools of Charlie’s and then lifting an over 6ft 210+lbs dead weight man soaked in blood.

Exactly why are you perseverating on this? Why is it so important to you to see his body, or others, soaked in blood? What are you trying to prove? Or, are you just someone who loves to see the suffering of others?

Aren’t you mad at the FBI for screwing this up? If you want justice for Charlie, how can you not see the problems in this pic, the screwups, the texts as major red flags? It’s wild to me.

I see nothing wrong with the investigation. They have an incredible amount of unimpeachable evidence. Forensic evidence. DNA evidence. Digital evidence. And, they also have the testimony of the killer's lover. They have done a damned good job. I hope they don't accept a plea deal from Robinson. He needs to go to trial and be convicted. And, he will be. The evidence is overwhelming.

Mmmkay. You’ve never sat on a jury have you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is video of these guys actually picking Charlie up, soaked in blood. That part seems to be conspicuously missing. When they rush up to try to ‘save his life’ presumably stepping in pools of Charlie’s and then lifting an over 6ft 210+lbs dead weight man soaked in blood.

Exactly why are you perseverating on this? Why is it so important to you to see his body, or others, soaked in blood? What are you trying to prove? Or, are you just someone who loves to see the suffering of others?

I’ve experienced traumas, GSWs, lifted dead weight people bleeding out. It wasn’t easy and we weren’t clean afterwards.

So?

Everything about this is wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is video of these guys actually picking Charlie up, soaked in blood. That part seems to be conspicuously missing. When they rush up to try to ‘save his life’ presumably stepping in pools of Charlie’s and then lifting an over 6ft 210+lbs dead weight man soaked in blood.

Exactly why are you perseverating on this? Why is it so important to you to see his body, or others, soaked in blood? What are you trying to prove? Or, are you just someone who loves to see the suffering of others?

I’ve experienced traumas, GSWs, lifted dead weight people bleeding out. It wasn’t easy and we weren’t clean afterwards.

So?

Go shadow an EMT in an inner city.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

He was a multi-millionaire Zionist stooge dispatched to college campuses to gin up support for Zionism, Trump, and to agitate and fracture American kids, i.e. divide and conquer. And frankly, he wasn't as big of a deal as you shills are trying to make him out to be. A subversive political grifter who lived like a gilded-era king in a 10k sq/ft mansion.

How Trump’s MAGA movement helped Charlie Kirk become a millionaire
https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-trump-turning-point-maga-d08a98e439fa4e902cb756d7e35153db

That article does a good job distilling the grift machine. All the murky LLCs that made hundreds of millions in revenue and donations disappear, Kirk's lavish lifestyle, private jets, 5-star hotels, multiple mansions. The whole thing was a shameless money-grab, now MAGA is trying to make him out to be this humble saint. Give me a break. He was nothing more than Hannity for young adults.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

He was a multi-millionaire Zionist stooge dispatched to college campuses to gin up support for Zionism, Trump, and to agitate and fracture American kids, i.e. divide and conquer. And frankly, he wasn't as big of a deal as you shills are trying to make him out to be. A subversive political grifter who lived like a gilded-era king in a 10k sq/ft mansion.

How Trump’s MAGA movement helped Charlie Kirk become a millionaire
https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-trump-turning-point-maga-d08a98e439fa4e902cb756d7e35153db

That article does a good job distilling the grift machine. All the murky LLCs that made hundreds of millions in revenue and donations disappear, Kirk's lavish lifestyle, private jets, 5-star hotels, multiple mansions. The whole thing was a shameless money-grab, now MAGA is trying to make him out to be this humble saint. Give me a break. He was nothing more than Hannity for young adults.

Exactly, and then he was just used and discarded when he was no longer supporting their narrative.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Unfortunately, Charlie’s murder is far more consequential than his life. Charlie will mostly be remembered as the guy who was murdered.

[Anonymous]

Charlie Kirk Divided My Generation. His Death Is Making It Worse
The conservative activist has shaped political opinions within Gen Z. I fear his assassination may push us past the brink

""Charlie Kirk was the one who stood up for us, and that's why these radical leftists had to take him out," remarked one of my fellow football players at my staunchly conservative college. He wasn't the only one. Many teammates were rightfully mad. But instead of directing their anger toward only the killer, they blamed everyone on the left for the actions of one fringe individual. This instinct to condemn the whole other side for the actions of one crazy person isn't new; and it sows seeds of hatred that only deepen our divides."

...

"I'm in a unique spot to see this picture. I recently graduated from a conservative all-boys high school in Chicago, and now I attend a right-leaning Southern college, playing football at both. In these places, I've learned to keep my liberal politics hidden. I first heard of Kirk when I was in middle school, but his name blew up by the time I reached high school, starting with my freshman year, when a friend showed me a viral clip of him debating a "woke" college student on abortion rights and completely dismantling her argument. From that moment, it felt like everyone I knew had seen him.

Living in conservative spaces has showed me something worrisome about how my generation treats disagreement. It's not just that I'm outnumbered, it's that I've heard teammates and friends say they've never had a Democrat friend before because "those Democrats hate our country" and you "can't befriend evil." Those comments are more than political disagreements; they're seeds of hatred that grow into distrust and dehumanization. When you see someone as hating your country, you stop seeing them as a person who can be reasoned with, and mistakenly begin thinking that violence is the only way."

https://apple.news/ARXUDVtXESWW6lRpxcfNIdg

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Unfortunately, Charlie’s murder is far more consequential than his life. Charlie will mostly be remembered as the guy who was murdered.

I am more concerned with why Tyler Robinson being framed as I had absolutely no idea who Charlie Kirk was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

He was a multi-millionaire Zionist stooge dispatched to college campuses to gin up support for Zionism, Trump, and to agitate and fracture American kids, i.e. divide and conquer. And frankly, he wasn't as big of a deal as you shills are trying to make him out to be. A subversive political grifter who lived like a gilded-era king in a 10k sq/ft mansion.

How Trump’s MAGA movement helped Charlie Kirk become a millionaire
https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-trump-turning-point-maga-d08a98e439fa4e902cb756d7e35153db

That article does a good job distilling the grift machine. All the murky LLCs that made hundreds of millions in revenue and donations disappear, Kirk's lavish lifestyle, private jets, 5-star hotels, multiple mansions. The whole thing was a shameless money-grab, now MAGA is trying to make him out to be this humble saint. Give me a break. He was nothing more than Hannity for young adults.

Exactly, and then he was just used and discarded when he was no longer supporting their narrative.

Didn’t think the posters in this board could be more callous. It was I wrong. What a bunch of ill-informed and hateful women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

He was a multi-millionaire Zionist stooge dispatched to college campuses to gin up support for Zionism, Trump, and to agitate and fracture American kids, i.e. divide and conquer. And frankly, he wasn't as big of a deal as you shills are trying to make him out to be. A subversive political grifter who lived like a gilded-era king in a 10k sq/ft mansion.

How Trump’s MAGA movement helped Charlie Kirk become a millionaire
https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-trump-turning-point-maga-d08a98e439fa4e902cb756d7e35153db

That article does a good job distilling the grift machine. All the murky LLCs that made hundreds of millions in revenue and donations disappear, Kirk's lavish lifestyle, private jets, 5-star hotels, multiple mansions. The whole thing was a shameless money-grab, now MAGA is trying to make him out to be this humble saint. Give me a break. He was nothing more than Hannity for young adults.

Exactly, and then he was just used and discarded when he was no longer supporting their narrative.

Didn’t think the posters in this board could be more callous. It was I wrong. What a bunch of ill-informed and hateful women.

Are you honestly buying this narrative? What is your educational level?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Unfortunately, Charlie’s murder is far more consequential than his life. Charlie will mostly be remembered as the guy who was murdered.

I am more concerned with why Tyler Robinson being framed as I had absolutely no idea who Charlie Kirk was.

Lots of different possibilities. If you go based on past history of similar situations, could be blackmail ( maybe he had a CP) or mK Ultra or someone trying to piggyback on his attempted crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is video of these guys actually picking Charlie up, soaked in blood. That part seems to be conspicuously missing. When they rush up to try to ‘save his life’ presumably stepping in pools of Charlie’s and then lifting an over 6ft 210+lbs dead weight man soaked in blood.

Exactly why are you perseverating on this? Why is it so important to you to see his body, or others, soaked in blood? What are you trying to prove? Or, are you just someone who loves to see the suffering of others?

Aren’t you mad at the FBI for screwing this up? If you want justice for Charlie, how can you not see the problems in this pic, the screwups, the texts as major red flags? It’s wild to me.

I see nothing wrong with the investigation. They have an incredible amount of unimpeachable evidence. Forensic evidence. DNA evidence. Digital evidence. And, they also have the testimony of the killer's lover. They have done a damned good job. I hope they don't accept a plea deal from Robinson. He needs to go to trial and be convicted. And, he will be. The evidence is overwhelming.

What a silly person you are if you don't realize that entering a guilty plea means getting convicted. Do you think that Bryan Kohberger wasn't convicted? Dropping the DP and sending this kid away for LWOP saves the citizens of Utah millions of dollars, ensures a result that addresses the crime sufficiently, and saves the victim's family from the emotional distress of a trial and appeals. Only people bent on vengeance with blood lust in them would demand a trial and continued pursuit of the DP.