Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kirk's memorial service scheduled for Sunday and Friday mo, Vance, et al will attend. Thank goodness for the NFL who won't reschedule their games.

Trump's not going?

Trump’s going. Almost the entire cabinet is speaking. It’s going to be a Trump rally by the time it’s over.

Trump is at his Virginia country club today. I saw the motorcycle cops in the Food Lion parking lot this morning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on theank roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

Good God! You are insufferable!
THEY WERE TRYING TO SAVE HIS LIFE? Let me be clear - when they moved him, they thought he was still alive. Get it?
And, you think they dissembled the crime scene before it was investigated? Think again. Idiot.

I’m pp. it looks like a lot was already taken from the tent in that pic.

You also have no idea of HOW LONG they had been investigating before this pic was taken.
Just stop with the armchair investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on theank roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

Good God! You are insufferable!
THEY WERE TRYING TO SAVE HIS LIFE? Let me be clear - when they moved him, they thought he was still alive. Get it?
And, you think they dissembled the crime scene before it was investigated? Think again. Idiot.

I’m pp. it looks like a lot was already taken from the tent in that pic.

You also have no idea of HOW LONG they had been investigating before this pic was taken.
Just stop with the armchair investigation.

Any bloody footprints?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on theank roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

Good God! You are insufferable!
THEY WERE TRYING TO SAVE HIS LIFE? Let me be clear - when they moved him, they thought he was still alive. Get it?
And, you think they dissembled the crime scene before it was investigated? Think again. Idiot.

I’m pp. it looks like a lot was already taken from the tent in that pic.

You also have no idea of HOW LONG they had been investigating before this pic was taken.
Just stop with the armchair investigation.

Any bloody footprints?

I wouldn't know since I was not part of the investigative team. Neither do you.
This is not an episode of Law and Order.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on theank roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

Good God! You are insufferable!
THEY WERE TRYING TO SAVE HIS LIFE? Let me be clear - when they moved him, they thought he was still alive. Get it?
And, you think they dissembled the crime scene before it was investigated? Think again. Idiot.

I’m pp. it looks like a lot was already taken from the tent in that pic.

You also have no idea of HOW LONG they had been investigating before this pic was taken.
Just stop with the armchair investigation.

Any bloody footprints?

I wouldn't know since I was not part of the investigative team. Neither do you.
This is not an episode of Law and Order.

We see the ridiculous video of about 6 guys throwing Charlie into the back of the truck and I don’t see a trail of blood or footprints, nothing…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on theank roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

Good God! You are insufferable!
THEY WERE TRYING TO SAVE HIS LIFE? Let me be clear - when they moved him, they thought he was still alive. Get it?
And, you think they dissembled the crime scene before it was investigated? Think again. Idiot.

I’m pp. it looks like a lot was already taken from the tent in that pic.

You also have no idea of HOW LONG they had been investigating before this pic was taken.
Just stop with the armchair investigation.

Any bloody footprints?

I wouldn't know since I was not part of the investigative team. Neither do you.
This is not an episode of Law and Order.

We see the ridiculous video of about 6 guys throwing Charlie into the back of the truck and I don’t see a trail of blood or footprints, nothing…

Hey - I have an idea.

Why don't you pick up and move to Orem, Utah, register to vote and maybe, just maybe, you will get a jury summons and can see ALL the crime scene photos. Maybe then you can satisfy your sick curiosity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on theank roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

Good God! You are insufferable!
THEY WERE TRYING TO SAVE HIS LIFE? Let me be clear - when they moved him, they thought he was still alive. Get it?
And, you think they dissembled the crime scene before it was investigated? Think again. Idiot.

I’m pp. it looks like a lot was already taken from the tent in that pic.

You also have no idea of HOW LONG they had been investigating before this pic was taken.
Just stop with the armchair investigation.

Any bloody footprints?

I wouldn't know since I was not part of the investigative team. Neither do you.
This is not an episode of Law and Order.

We see the ridiculous video of about 6 guys throwing Charlie into the back of the truck and I don’t see a trail of blood or footprints, nothing…

Hey - I have an idea.

Why don't you pick up and move to Orem, Utah, register to vote and maybe, just maybe, you will get a jury summons and can see ALL the crime scene photos. Maybe then you can satisfy your sick curiosity.

The video is evidence

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on theank roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

Good God! You are insufferable!
THEY WERE TRYING TO SAVE HIS LIFE? Let me be clear - when they moved him, they thought he was still alive. Get it?
And, you think they dissembled the crime scene before it was investigated? Think again. Idiot.

I’m pp. it looks like a lot was already taken from the tent in that pic.

You also have no idea of HOW LONG they had been investigating before this pic was taken.
Just stop with the armchair investigation.

Any bloody footprints?

I wouldn't know since I was not part of the investigative team. Neither do you.
This is not an episode of Law and Order.

We see the ridiculous video of about 6 guys throwing Charlie into the back of the truck and I don’t see a trail of blood or footprints, nothing…

Hey - I have an idea.

Why don't you pick up and move to Orem, Utah, register to vote and maybe, just maybe, you will get a jury summons and can see ALL the crime scene photos. Maybe then you can satisfy your sick curiosity.

The video is evidence

Try pouring at least 5 litres of red paint out on the ground, and then stepping all over in it, see if you don’t leave any footprints. Then they were also carrying Kirk who should have been drenched in blood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on theank roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

Good God! You are insufferable!
THEY WERE TRYING TO SAVE HIS LIFE? Let me be clear - when they moved him, they thought he was still alive. Get it?
And, you think they dissembled the crime scene before it was investigated? Think again. Idiot.

I’m pp. it looks like a lot was already taken from the tent in that pic.

You also have no idea of HOW LONG they had been investigating before this pic was taken.
Just stop with the armchair investigation.

LOL. You’re mad that you posted a pic that made the FBI look even worse. You don’t think a jury isn’t going to scrutinize this photo like DCUM. Like pp said, we’ve seen bloodier bathrooms after a period than in that pic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

[Anonymous]

Where is video of these guys actually picking Charlie up, soaked in blood. That part seems to be conspicuously missing. When they rush up to try to ‘save his life’ presumably stepping in pools of Charlie’s and then lifting an over 6ft 210+lbs dead weight man soaked in blood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where is video of these guys actually picking Charlie up, soaked in blood. That part seems to be conspicuously missing. When they rush up to try to ‘save his life’ presumably stepping in pools of Charlie’s and then lifting an over 6ft 210+lbs dead weight man soaked in blood.

Exactly why are you perseverating on this? Why is it so important to you to see his body, or others, soaked in blood? What are you trying to prove? Or, are you just someone who loves to see the suffering of others?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is video of these guys actually picking Charlie up, soaked in blood. That part seems to be conspicuously missing. When they rush up to try to ‘save his life’ presumably stepping in pools of Charlie’s and then lifting an over 6ft 210+lbs dead weight man soaked in blood.

Exactly why are you perseverating on this? Why is it so important to you to see his body, or others, soaked in blood? What are you trying to prove? Or, are you just someone who loves to see the suffering of others?

I’ve experienced traumas, GSWs, lifted dead weight people bleeding out. It wasn’t easy and we weren’t clean afterwards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is video of these guys actually picking Charlie up, soaked in blood. That part seems to be conspicuously missing. When they rush up to try to ‘save his life’ presumably stepping in pools of Charlie’s and then lifting an over 6ft 210+lbs dead weight man soaked in blood.

Exactly why are you perseverating on this? Why is it so important to you to see his body, or others, soaked in blood? What are you trying to prove? Or, are you just someone who loves to see the suffering of others?

Aren’t you mad at the FBI for screwing this up? If you want justice for Charlie, how can you not see the problems in this pic, the screwups, the texts as major red flags? It’s wild to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is video of these guys actually picking Charlie up, soaked in blood. That part seems to be conspicuously missing. When they rush up to try to ‘save his life’ presumably stepping in pools of Charlie’s and then lifting an over 6ft 210+lbs dead weight man soaked in blood.

Exactly why are you perseverating on this? Why is it so important to you to see his body, or others, soaked in blood? What are you trying to prove? Or, are you just someone who loves to see the suffering of others?

I’ve experienced traumas, GSWs, lifted dead weight people bleeding out. It wasn’t easy and we weren’t clean afterwards.

So?