new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The kavanaugh allegations are Russian collusion 2.0 . The fakest of the fake news.

This. I find it hilariously sad that liberals constantly insist Republicans lie, when it fact, liberals are experts in the art of planting fake stories and insisting they’re true - and that anyone who questions them is “morally bankrupt”. That’s exactly the phrase I would use to describe them.

Do you have any examples, because I haven't seen any on this thread?

I find it hilarious that conservatives use to care about the deficit and national security and personal integrity. Look how much they have...grown...in the last 3 years.

Any examples of what? Liberals lying? This entire thread is a prime example. You can’t stand that Kavanaugh is a SCJ, so you’ll stoop as low as needed to take him down, even if that requires peddling lies and unproven allegations/rumors. It’s disgusting.

If you want to talk liars, look no further than Brett! https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5d82da62e4b0849d47233e56 Oh, Mr Dishonorable promised to be interviewed by the authors so long as they would write that he didn’t.

This man is such a skeezy slime bucket.

Wow. Just, wow. I expect better from a man sitting in the highest court in the country.

The fact that you believe the authors is hilarious. They have been less than credible in the roll out of their book.

That's not the kind of lie that gets spun into whole cloth from nothing, and you know it. Looks like your guy Brett isn't so honorable after all. Can't say it's a surprise.

Don't you find it just a tad bit interesting that this wasn't the lede in the reporters' story? Don't you find it just a bit curious that this wasn't "revealed" until they saw the disastrous roll out of a book that is getting mediocre reviews (and that is being generous)? Sorry, they have screwed up so much in the story in the NY Times and the lack of sourcing in their book.

When a source speaks to someone "off the record" the source is not asking you to lie. The authors are not being honest.

Kavanaugh asked them to lie and say he declined the interview. That is not "off the record".

The writers have changed their story about exactly what happened.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/nyt-reporters-havent-kept-their-story-straight-about-brett-kavanaugh-asking-them-to-lie

The BK haters will keep grasping after straw after straw after straw...

A Washington Examiner opinion article. Stellar source. Totes trustworthy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The kavanaugh allegations are Russian collusion 2.0 . The fakest of the fake news.

This. I find it hilariously sad that liberals constantly insist Republicans lie, when it fact, liberals are experts in the art of planting fake stories and insisting they’re true - and that anyone who questions them is “morally bankrupt”. That’s exactly the phrase I would use to describe them.

Do you have any examples, because I haven't seen any on this thread?

I find it hilarious that conservatives use to care about the deficit and national security and personal integrity. Look how much they have...grown...in the last 3 years.

Any examples of what? Liberals lying? This entire thread is a prime example. You can’t stand that Kavanaugh is a SCJ, so you’ll stoop as low as needed to take him down, even if that requires peddling lies and unproven allegations/rumors. It’s disgusting.

If you want to talk liars, look no further than Brett! https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5d82da62e4b0849d47233e56 Oh, Mr Dishonorable promised to be interviewed by the authors so long as they would write that he didn’t.

This man is such a skeezy slime bucket.

Wow. Just, wow. I expect better from a man sitting in the highest court in the country.

The fact that you believe the authors is hilarious. They have been less than credible in the roll out of their book.

That's not the kind of lie that gets spun into whole cloth from nothing, and you know it. Looks like your guy Brett isn't so honorable after all. Can't say it's a surprise.

Don't you find it just a tad bit interesting that this wasn't the lede in the reporters' story? Don't you find it just a bit curious that this wasn't "revealed" until they saw the disastrous roll out of a book that is getting mediocre reviews (and that is being generous)? Sorry, they have screwed up so much in the story in the NY Times and the lack of sourcing in their book.

When a source speaks to someone "off the record" the source is not asking you to lie. The authors are not being honest.

Kavanaugh asked them to lie and say he declined the interview. That is not "off the record".

The writers have changed their story about exactly what happened.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/nyt-reporters-havent-kept-their-story-straight-about-brett-kavanaugh-asking-them-to-lie

The BK haters will keep grasping after straw after straw after straw...

Wow - interesting article that sheds some light on what looks like a sleazy deception. Thanks for posting.

+1,000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The kavanaugh allegations are Russian collusion 2.0 . The fakest of the fake news.

This. I find it hilariously sad that liberals constantly insist Republicans lie, when it fact, liberals are experts in the art of planting fake stories and insisting they’re true - and that anyone who questions them is “morally bankrupt”. That’s exactly the phrase I would use to describe them.

Do you have any examples, because I haven't seen any on this thread?

I find it hilarious that conservatives use to care about the deficit and national security and personal integrity. Look how much they have...grown...in the last 3 years.

Any examples of what? Liberals lying? This entire thread is a prime example. You can’t stand that Kavanaugh is a SCJ, so you’ll stoop as low as needed to take him down, even if that requires peddling lies and unproven allegations/rumors. It’s disgusting.

If you want to talk liars, look no further than Brett! https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5d82da62e4b0849d47233e56 Oh, Mr Dishonorable promised to be interviewed by the authors so long as they would write that he didn’t.

This man is such a skeezy slime bucket.

Wow. Just, wow. I expect better from a man sitting in the highest court in the country.

The fact that you believe the authors is hilarious. They have been less than credible in the roll out of their book.

That's not the kind of lie that gets spun into whole cloth from nothing, and you know it. Looks like your guy Brett isn't so honorable after all. Can't say it's a surprise.

Don't you find it just a tad bit interesting that this wasn't the lede in the reporters' story? Don't you find it just a bit curious that this wasn't "revealed" until they saw the disastrous roll out of a book that is getting mediocre reviews (and that is being generous)? Sorry, they have screwed up so much in the story in the NY Times and the lack of sourcing in their book.

When a source speaks to someone "off the record" the source is not asking you to lie. The authors are not being honest.

Kavanaugh asked them to lie and say he declined the interview. That is not "off the record".

The writers have changed their story about exactly what happened.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/nyt-reporters-havent-kept-their-story-straight-about-brett-kavanaugh-asking-them-to-lie

The BK haters will keep grasping after straw after straw after straw...

I'm using the same rule for Kavanaugh stories that I use with Trump stories......

Wait 24 hours. Because, initial stories are usually inaccurate and incorrect. The 24-hour rule works pretty well. Although, it sometimes takes 48 hours.

You mean, wait 24, sometimes 48, hours for your RWNJ fake news rags to concoct an alternative narrative using "alternative facts", so your bubble of denial doesn't get popped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The kavanaugh allegations are Russian collusion 2.0 . The fakest of the fake news.

This. I find it hilariously sad that liberals constantly insist Republicans lie, when it fact, liberals are experts in the art of planting fake stories and insisting they’re true - and that anyone who questions them is “morally bankrupt”. That’s exactly the phrase I would use to describe them.

Do you have any examples, because I haven't seen any on this thread?

I find it hilarious that conservatives use to care about the deficit and national security and personal integrity. Look how much they have...grown...in the last 3 years.

Any examples of what? Liberals lying? This entire thread is a prime example. You can’t stand that Kavanaugh is a SCJ, so you’ll stoop as low as needed to take him down, even if that requires peddling lies and unproven allegations/rumors. It’s disgusting.

If you want to talk liars, look no further than Brett! https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5d82da62e4b0849d47233e56 Oh, Mr Dishonorable promised to be interviewed by the authors so long as they would write that he didn’t.

This man is such a skeezy slime bucket.

Wow. Just, wow. I expect better from a man sitting in the highest court in the country.

The fact that you believe the authors is hilarious. They have been less than credible in the roll out of their book.

That's not the kind of lie that gets spun into whole cloth from nothing, and you know it. Looks like your guy Brett isn't so honorable after all. Can't say it's a surprise.

Don't you find it just a tad bit interesting that this wasn't the lede in the reporters' story? Don't you find it just a bit curious that this wasn't "revealed" until they saw the disastrous roll out of a book that is getting mediocre reviews (and that is being generous)? Sorry, they have screwed up so much in the story in the NY Times and the lack of sourcing in their book.

When a source speaks to someone "off the record" the source is not asking you to lie. The authors are not being honest.

Kavanaugh asked them to lie and say he declined the interview. That is not "off the record".

The writers have changed their story about exactly what happened.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/nyt-reporters-havent-kept-their-story-straight-about-brett-kavanaugh-asking-them-to-lie

The BK haters will keep grasping after straw after straw after straw...

I'm using the same rule for Kavanaugh stories that I use with Trump stories......

Wait 24 hours. Because, initial stories are usually inaccurate and incorrect. The 24-hour rule works pretty well. Although, it sometimes takes 48 hours.

You mean, wait 24, sometimes 48, hours for your RWNJ fake news rags to concoct an alternative narrative using "alternative facts", so your bubble of denial doesn't get popped.

Really? Who's "news rag" omitted exculpatory info to start this whole thing?

[Anonymous]

OMG. Why are people still talking about this!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG. Why are people still talking about this!!

Because an illegitimate president* (actually, the Federalists) installed an attempted rapist, an inveterate gambler, a mean drunk, someone who lacks judicial temperament and an enormous financial debt to a mystery person. It’s bad, very bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG. Why are people still talking about this!!

Because an illegitimate president* (actually, the Federalists) installed an attempted rapist, an inveterate gambler, a mean drunk, someone who lacks judicial temperament and an enormous financial debt to a mystery person. It’s bad, very bad.

The "illegitimate president" was elected according to our Constitution.
ONE person has said that Kavanaugh attempted to rape her. THIS person could not remember where, when, or many other details including who was there. Her details changed repeatedly. And, her lawyer has not admitted that the accuser had political goals with this.

By the way, the "mystery person" was his parents.

Get over it. Lies don't help your cause.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG. Why are people still talking about this!!

Because an illegitimate president* (actually, the Federalists) installed an attempted rapist, an inveterate gambler, a mean drunk, someone who lacks judicial temperament and an enormous financial debt to a mystery person. It’s bad, very bad.

The "illegitimate president" was elected according to our Constitution.
ONE person has said that Kavanaugh attempted to rape her. THIS person could not remember where, when, or many other details including who was there. Her details changed repeatedly. And, her lawyer has not admitted that the accuser had political goals with this.

By the way, the "mystery person" was his parents.

Get over it. Lies don't help your cause.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG. Why are people still talking about this!!

Because an illegitimate president* (actually, the Federalists) installed an attempted rapist, an inveterate gambler, a mean drunk, someone who lacks judicial temperament and an enormous financial debt to a mystery person. It’s bad, very bad.

The "illegitimate president" was elected according to our Constitution.
ONE person has said that Kavanaugh attempted to rape her. THIS person could not remember where, when, or many other details including who was there. Her details changed repeatedly. And, her lawyer has not admitted that the accuser had political goals with this.

By the way, the "mystery person" was his parents.

Get over it. Lies don't help your cause.

+100

No, no, no, keep lying please. The more ridiculous this gets the better chance trump has to win reelection in a reaganesque landslide.

Keep it up dems! You’re doing great!!

[Anonymous]

Here’s some info on how laughable the NYT has become regarding Justice Kavanaugh.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/09/20/unfit-to-print-new-york-times-kavanaugh/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG. Why are people still talking about this!!

For the same Feinstein manufactured the original story: people live gossip.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG. Why are people still talking about this!!

Because an illegitimate president* (actually, the Federalists) installed an attempted rapist, an inveterate gambler, a mean drunk, someone who lacks judicial temperament and an enormous financial debt to a mystery person. It’s bad, very bad.

Excuse me, excuse me. You forgot that he robbed Merrick Garland of his seat on SCOTUS. Your bot-masters won’t like that omission, even if it is NYT-esque

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG. Why are people still talking about this!!

Because an illegitimate president* (actually, the Federalists) installed an attempted rapist, an inveterate gambler, a mean drunk, someone who lacks judicial temperament and an enormous financial debt to a mystery person. It’s bad, very bad.

Excuse me, excuse me. You forgot that he robbed Merrick Garland of his seat on SCOTUS. Your bot-masters won’t like that omission, even if it is NYT-esque

Excuse me, Kavanaugh did not rob Garland of anything. Read the Constitution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here’s some info on how laughable the NYT has become regarding Justice Kavanaugh.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/09/20/unfit-to-print-new-york-times-kavanaugh/

One might cite one’s toilet for a more intelligent, less biased account.

Mark Judge, the witness to the attempted rape, writes for the Daily Caller. Did they disclose this conflict of interest?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG. Why are people still talking about this!!

Because an illegitimate president* (actually, the Federalists) installed an attempted rapist, an inveterate gambler, a mean drunk, someone who lacks judicial temperament and an enormous financial debt to a mystery person. It’s bad, very bad.

Excuse me, excuse me. You forgot that he robbed Merrick Garland of his seat on SCOTUS. Your bot-masters won’t like that omission, even if it is NYT-esque

Excuse me, Kavanaugh did not rob Garland of anything. Read the Constitution.

Yes, it was Moscow Mitch who deprived Garland of the consideration.