Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 2

[Anonymous]

Funny that she didn't prevent cavanugh before , he was in the second highest court under the supreme , total BS, failing ford

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Ford is now saying she talked to "people on the beach" about the assault and Kavanaugh this summer. She says they encouraged her to go to the media. Previously, she said she only told the story to her therapist and her husband. Another major discrepancy.

Katie Pavlich

oh boy, that IS a big discrepancy. Lyin' scum Kavanaugh is going to get off scot-free!

No it isn't. Have you been paying attention?

She's screwed.

Hardly. Kavanaugh may still get confirmed but women everywhere feel that Congress and more specifically the GOP have shat on them as people. Recent polls week over week are showing an increase in support among women for Democratic candidates in multiple races around the country. Now many of those other women, after having seen her testify, are going to flock to Democrats. The GOP will be the ones screwed, here.

Feel free to impeach. Enjoy. Should be fun to see those with jobs become jobless again.

I said nothing about impeachment.

[Anonymous]

She’s answering every question thoroughly and consistently. You’re playing gotcha and distorting the facts and statements behind them. You are scrambling.

She is a very confused woman. Couldn't come because she doesn't like to fly--hoped they would come to her, which they offered to do. She turned them down?????
Doesn't mind flying for vacations.

Remembers the event--but, doesn't remember how she got home or got there. (Still not credible that she told no girl friends.)

She doesn't remember if she shared the therapists notes with the reporter--or just told the reporter. ??????Seriously? This was just a few weeks ago. Sharing the therapist notes would have involved downloading or fowarding. She cannot remember that?

She's disclosed different numbers of people at various times.

She believes herself. Not sure she is accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
@MattWalshBlog
Follow Follow @MattWalshBlog
More
The fact that Ford was driven home from an attempted rape, yet cannot tell us who drove her home, is very curious. The person who was one-on-one with her immediately after the incident could provide us valuable insight. Yet Ford can't tell us who it was.

If Ford was making up a story she wanted to hold together, she would have said she got a ride home from a girl named Lisa (the most popular girl baby name the year Kavanaugh was born) who said Ford's house was on her way. She didn't know the girl, she hadn't seen her at one of the parties before, and didn't know her last name. Sorry, I can't help you find her to confirm or refute my story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You have been very honest about what you cannot remember . That's Blumenthal's defense of her? Really? Did he remember NOT serving in Vietnam?

He and Brian Williams were in the same platoon. Then Williams got transfered to NASA and became a door gunner on the space Shuttle

[Anonymous]

Would someone please call the Safeway at the Village of Potomac and ask one of the checkers to go back in that dusty office and riffle through that metal file cabinet and find the records from 1980 to 1985 and get the darn dates Mark Judge bagged groceries and smoked a joint behind the alley on his 15-minute breaks?

[Anonymous]

Amy Klobuchar is my new hero.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Funny that she didn't prevent cavanugh before , he was in the second highest court under the supreme , total BS, failing ford

Quick, name a circuit court judge on the Fourth Circuit. I'm waiting...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amy Klobuchar is my new hero.

But she doesn't have thigh gap. And that's all that matters to dcum

[Anonymous]

Chris Wallace, no friend to liberals, just called this a "disaster for the Republicans":

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/09/27/chris-wallace-christine-blasey-ford-testimony-rachel-mitchell-disaster-republicans

[Anonymous]

Evading the question of who hired the person who administered the polygraph.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So wow. Ford counsel says that the reason they refuse to provide to underlying data for polygraph is because committee won’t let their polygraph guy testify. More demands; more withholding of information.

Kimberley Strassel

That’s blatant distortion. They were explaining why they have the report from the guy but not all of the components used in the analysis. That is totally and completely usual. You obviously have an agenda.

Polygraphs are bullshit. I don’t care about any of this.

Oh okay. So you don’t want the evidence that doesn’t suit your narrative.

Um, no. I’ve taken multiple polygraphs and know how they work and how easy they are to beat.

When you're a sociopath....

Not necessary at all. There’s a reason that polygraph results are inadmissible as evidence in a court of law. It’s pseudoscience and not trustworthy at all.

Right. You don’t like the results because they don’t match your narrative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Would someone please call the Safeway at the Village of Potomac and ask one of the checkers to go back in that dusty office and riffle through that metal file cabinet and find the records from 1980 to 1985 and get the darn dates Mark Judge bagged groceries and smoked a joint behind the alley on his 15-minute breaks?

Lol, right? So stupid. The FBI is not needed to figure this out.

[Anonymous]

She doesn't remember when she took the polygraph either??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So wow. Ford counsel says that the reason they refuse to provide to underlying data for polygraph is because committee won’t let their polygraph guy testify. More demands; more withholding of information.

Kimberley Strassel

That’s blatant distortion. They were explaining why they have the report from the guy but not all of the components used in the analysis. That is totally and completely usual. You obviously have an agenda.

Polygraphs are bullshit. I don’t care about any of this.

Oh okay. So you don’t want the evidence that doesn’t suit your narrative.

Um, no. I’ve taken multiple polygraphs and know how they work and how easy they are to beat.

When you're a sociopath....

Not necessary at all. There’s a reason that polygraph results are inadmissible as evidence in a court of law. It’s pseudoscience and not trustworthy at all.

Right. You don’t like the results because they don’t match your narrative.

They are not admissible for a reason. You’re an idiot.