This is correct and how the MPD operate. It isn’t like they have the time to investigate anything unless forced to by pressure from national news or something high profile. There are no resources for regular operations and they move onto the next case as soon as possible. They take a statement, file the paperwork, and with no clear leads they move onto the next case immediately. |
+1 the issue here is how GDS leadership have responded to the issue. |
+1 |
| Honestly, if you have a kid at GDS and feel the school‘s response was inadequate, pull your kid out. There are several kids who would be happy to take your child’s space. If you don’t have a kid at GDS, I’m not sure why you care so much about how the school responds to a particular issue. I have multiple kids at the school and while I think the school could I’ve been more transparent in their handling the issue, ultimately I know enough about the situation to feel completely confident that the investigation done was sufficient and kids are not at risk. |
I am reasonably certain that the parents email said they were students but I am not going to dig through this thread to find said information. If the child said that they might not have been students, then the school should be able to check the school log of visitors and find out who was on campus at the time of the incident. Otherwise, you are thinking that teachers or staff on campus did this. Again, you are talking 2 people, not 1, so this was coordinated. |
Again, tell us how you would approach this investigation. An 11 year old child tells his parents about an assault that took place in November in January, no specific dates given so any where from 9 weeks, assuming the assault happened in the first week of November and the boy told his parents in the first week of January, to 13 weeks, assuming the assault happened in the first week of November and was reported to the parents at the end of January. The police report was submitted on 23 January. The family told the school in February. What do the Police do? The child cannot identify his attackers. I would assume that the Police asked if the child's clothing from that day had been left untouched and that the answer would be no. I doubt the kid hid away his school uniform so it wasn't washed. Any physical evidence on the child would have healed and been washed away. I would assume that they visited the school and looked for security cameras and asked for any video that they had from that location of the school if it existed. I would hope that they asked the school for their log book of visitors, I am assuming that GDS requires visitors sign in and out of the school, so they could look at those individuals who might have been visiting the school on that day. You seem to be assuming that the Police came, took the child's statement and did not ask about clothes, video footage, and other potential evidence and hence did a lousy job investigating. If they did all of the above, what else do you expect them to do? Unless the child remembers something to help find the individuals or someone ends up sharing information, there is not much to investigate. And if no one had heard something and didn't report it before or after the family email and all this outrage, it is not likely to happen. |
No, it should end because everything that can be said has been said, repeatedly across 60 pages. |
I hope they keep saying it until the school takes action. |
Dream on. The schools don’t operate through this anonymous chat board. At any moment there’s probably a dozen people who have an interest in this thread that are checking it and commenting for a couple of days and then they disappear. By the time deposits are due for the next school year this thread will be buried on page 7. |
|
I would love some of the "GDS is the moral equivalent of Pam Bondi" posters to very specifically identify what they think the school should do. What should they have reported, should the family have been allowed to veto any communications, should random kids have been expelled? Like, what should have happened as specifically as possible.
The parents called the cops. The cops investigated and concluded that there was no evidence. It means one of two things: 1. The alleged victim was traumatized but in the period of time between the incident and his reporting of it, any evidence disappeared. This was combined with his inability to identify characteristics of his attackers other than that they were masked/obstructed and altered their voice. Or 2. The event was fabricated. In either case, I'm not quite sure what the school should have done differently, recognizing that feeding the online yentas is not actually an institutional responsibility. |
This is already in the works with several families |
Good! |
| Many people have posted the specific things that GDS should have done differently. Stop asking for it. There is a long list. |
+1 |
It's implicit in the email that the parents sent. |