Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.


She also lied about the set being closed for the birthing scene, who was present on set, and what she was wearing. All easily disprovable facts.


Have you seen footage of the scene being filmed? No. So actually you are saying she lied because he alleges a narrative different than she does. But all he has is a call sheet. That's not proof of anything. That means the set was supposed to be closed. Was it? Of course he's going to claim it was. Of course he's going to say she was "fully clothed" (just as a point of order, I would not consider myself fully clothed if I was wearing a pair of pair of underwear briefs and a hospital gown partially draped over me while sitting in stirrups). Of course he's going to claim everyone who was on set that day was supposed to be there.

You are assuming his narrative is the correct one and she is "lying" because.... his narrative came out second? He provided a call sheet that doesn't actually prove anything? Why?

You don't actually know what happened. You don't know if she's lying, or he's lying, or they are both spinning the truth and it's actually something else (which is what I think is most likely the case).


How. Is. That. Not. Proof. Do the good people of a mommy board in DC need to have been on set? This is crazy. He has documentation contravening what she said, babe. It’s going to be her word against his and it seems far more likely than not he’ll have additional witness averred statements. Holy sht. You are weighing her claims as having more likely truth than his claims when he has documents backing his claims! Wow.


Don't call me babe. Ever.

A document announcing the set was closed is proof that the set was supposed to be closed. Lively alleges there were people on set who were not supposed to be there. The document does not disprove that. It's proof, but not definitive. You can say "oh it's more likely he has witnesses." Okay, let's hear from witnesses. But the call sheet does not alone disprove everything she's saying. It's a piece of paper.

I never said I think her claims are more likely to be truthful. I'm saying I don't know and neither do you. He has one document that doesn't really prove anything.

Wow./s


Actually he has many documents. And she has some texts taken out of context.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.


Did she lie/omit info, or did she present the facts the way she saw them, in the light most favorable to her?

Did she claim Baldoni said anything he didn't say, or did anything he didn't do? Because I don't think she did.


And that is why your many posts have no influence with the majority of us. Because yes, he has documentation that proves that she lied.


You know what, whatever. Let's see what happens in the case. Some of you are reading an amended complaint like it's the Bible and salivating over the idea that "Blake lied" based on nothing but an opposing filing. Okay. Enjoy. Lose your minds, call an evil, ugly liar online. It's obviously meeting some need you have to do this. Knock yourselves out.

Let's see what truth comes out when there is full discovery, actual footage comes out, witnesses are deposed, etc. I think both complaints are skewing the truth, and I think if the truth ever actually comes out, that will be obvious. Just like it was obvious during Depp/Heard, when it was shown that Johnny Depp was in fact an abusive drunk but for some reason everyone was convinced that Amber Heard was a manipulative, conniving liar. Sound familiar?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.


Did she lie/omit info, or did she present the facts the way she saw them, in the light most favorable to her?

Did she claim Baldoni said anything he didn't say, or did anything he didn't do? Because I don't think she did.


And that is why your many posts have no influence with the majority of us. Because yes, he has documentation that proves that she lied.


You know what, whatever. Let's see what happens in the case. Some of you are reading an amended complaint like it's the Bible and salivating over the idea that "Blake lied" based on nothing but an opposing filing. Okay. Enjoy. Lose your minds, call an evil, ugly liar online. It's obviously meeting some need you have to do this. Knock yourselves out.

Let's see what truth comes out when there is full discovery, actual footage comes out, witnesses are deposed, etc. I think both complaints are skewing the truth, and I think if the truth ever actually comes out, that will be obvious. Just like it was obvious during Depp/Heard, when it was shown that Johnny Depp was in fact an abusive drunk but for some reason everyone was convinced that Amber Heard was a manipulative, conniving liar. Sound familiar?


Yes you have said this many times and we don’t find it convincing. The evidence that has been public is insurmountable for her.
Anonymous
Don’t bait, she is reporting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Baldoni is the ideal client because he literally saved every text, voice mail and scrap of film. Talk about receipts.

On the other hand, I think Blake’s lawyers have opened themselves up to Rule 11 sanctions for the birthing scene allegations. The footnote dropped about what generally is worn in semi nude scenes is proof they knew that wasn’t what she was wearing— a hospital gown, pregnancy suit and underwear.


I actually don't think he Baldoni saved everything. I think he's benefitting from having been a producer and being part of Wayfarer, so there are dozens of people from whom he can get stuff because they work for him or with him.

Also, I don't think there is any Rule 11 exposure in Lively's lawsuit, sorry.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Don’t bait, she is reporting.


I'm reporting trolling. So this should say "Don't troll. A poster is reporting obvious, blatant trolling in this thread."

Which should actually go without saying, but I guess trolls gonna troll.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.


Did she lie/omit info, or did she present the facts the way she saw them, in the light most favorable to her?

Did she claim Baldoni said anything he didn't say, or did anything he didn't do? Because I don't think she did.


And that is why your many posts have no influence with the majority of us. Because yes, he has documentation that proves that she lied.


You know what, whatever. Let's see what happens in the case. Some of you are reading an amended complaint like it's the Bible and salivating over the idea that "Blake lied" based on nothing but an opposing filing. Okay. Enjoy. Lose your minds, call an evil, ugly liar online. It's obviously meeting some need you have to do this. Knock yourselves out.

Let's see what truth comes out when there is full discovery, actual footage comes out, witnesses are deposed, etc. I think both complaints are skewing the truth, and I think if the truth ever actually comes out, that will be obvious. Just like it was obvious during Depp/Heard, when it was shown that Johnny Depp was in fact an abusive drunk but for some reason everyone was convinced that Amber Heard was a manipulative, conniving liar. Sound familiar?


Yes you have said this many times and we don’t find it convincing. The evidence that has been public is insurmountable for her.


Who is "we"?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:One of the PP’s asked about whether it’s been shown BL actually lied. So I thought I’d break down some of the SH allegations (trying to take my mind off some other stuff):

Wayfair made her uncomfortable when either he or Jaime:

—Asked her trainer for her weight.
Seems like she was offended (since RR was also upset), but most likely Baldoni was not intending to fat-shame her, given all the times he encouraged her not to worry about her weight. He claims he was trying to prepare for a lift scene. She appears to have been mistaken (or lied?) about there not being a lift in the script.

—Sent her to a weight loss specialist.
She could have been offended when she saw this person’s website, or she could have mischaracterized this one. In any case, he has evidence showing that he was trying to get her probiotics, not weight loss medication.

—Approached her about being nude during birth scene.
Unclear what happened here. They probably did ask her, given they were toting around that video, but she did not end up being fully nude.

—Showed her a video of a woman giving birth
This did happen, and she did respond in a way that shows she was uncomfortable/thought it was porn. Video was put away after she said she would watch it later.

—Allowed people to wander on set during birthing scene in which she was mostly nude.
Baldoni shows set marked as closed, but we don’t know what happened on the day. There is some he said/she said here about who was present. There is also disagreement about what she was actually wearing. Either she was mostly nude with a thin strip of fabric “down there,” or she was wearing a pregnancy belly and hospital gown up top and black briefs on the bottom.

—Engaged in unscripted kissing.
This probably did happen, as JB claims both parties did this. The leaked video of the dance sequence shows he did kiss her neck, but she also mischaracterized at least some of what happened. (E.g., she insisted they talk throughout the unscripted scene but then also said there was no reason for him to talk in the unscripted scene.)

—Used the word “sexy” to describe her outfit.
This did happen, and Baldoni acknowledges BL was offended when he said it, so much so that he immediately apologized. We also know BL used this term around him to describe her outfits. But we do not know that BL ever used that term to describe outfits worn by members of the opposite sex.

Hired his friend to play the OBGYN.
This one seems like it was thrown in to establish a pattern of putting her in uncomfortable situations. The guy was a professional actor, so kinda think this one’s on her to act like a professional in return, but YMMV.

Walked in on her breastfeeding, and at least one time made eye contact with her (after asking the party to turn around).
We don’t really know for sure. We know she invited Baldoni in at least once. We know Heath was in her trailer while she was breastfeeding at least once and that he apologized “if” he inadvertently made eye contact.

What am I missing? I didn’t include anything that seemed to be outside the bounds of SH or anything that happened post production.



This is a good rundown, but a few things:

- The allegation against Heath is not that he walked in on her breastfeeding. It's that she was in the makeup trailer having body makeup removed from her chest (presumably like around her neckline area but she was apparently naked from the waist up) and Heath wanted to meet with her to discuss her complaint about Baldoni's behavior. According to her complaint, she asked if the meeting could wait until she was done and Heath insisted on staying, so she asked him to turn around. Lively then alleges she looked up and he was looking at her after she'd both asked him to leave and to turn around. Baldoni's complaint doesn't really challenge the basic facts here but says Lively was the one who was making it hard for them to find a time to meet, and also claims that Lively later joked about the incident and seemed okay with it.

- Lively also alleges that Baldoni and Heath spoke about porn on set multiple times and confessed to having porn addictions in the past. Lively says this came up multiple times and that she at one point told Baldoni that she had never seen porn, in an effort to get him to stop discussing it with her. Lively claims that Baldoni then revealed this to others in the cast/crew in a way that felt he was making ridiculing Lively for not having seen porn, or that he didn't believe it. Baldoni claims the discussions about porn only happened in relation to conversations about the film (I guess "male gaze" or whatever) and also says that Heath has never had a porn addiction and never claimed to have one on set.

- Lively alleges that one night she and Baldoni were sharing a car back to the city (Lively's assistant was also in the car) and that Baldoni shared with her a story about having been sexually assaulted by an ex-girlfriend. She claims he said this experience made him reflect on his own prior experiences with women and to ask himself if he'd always obtained consent from women he'd been with and that he hadn't. Baldoni claims this is a mischaracterization of what he said and that he was only talking about his experience being sexually assaulted by his girlfriend and did not say he'd had nonconsensual sex with women.

- Also part of Lively's claim regarding the on-camera intimacy is that she says Baldoni/Heath failed to involve an intimacy coordinator for scenes that weren't scripted as having intimacy but that she felt crossed the line into intimate scenes. Specifically the dancing scene he's released video of, and the birth scene which she said should have involved the intimacy coordinator if they were planning to push for nudity or partial nudity. Baldoni characterizes these scenes differently and says Lively was "fully clothed" in the birthing scene and also that the kissing in the dance scene did not rise to the level of requiring a coordinator. Baldoni also says Lively refused to meet with the intimacy coordinator during pre-production and that some of her objections to Baldoni related to him relaying things the intimacy coordinator had suggested (like apparently the IC suggested an oral sex sequence that was not in the script and when Baldoni related this to Lively, she felt it was an example of him trying to increase the level of intimacy or add "off script" intimacy).

- Lively also alleges some non-harassment stuff that I do think is still relevant because it raises the issue of whether she was justifiably uncomfortable on set and whether her demands prior to returning to set were reasonable. The biggest one is that she says Baldoni repeatedly told her that he'd been communicating with her dead father (who died in 2021) even after she asked him not to.

My conclusion on seeing this list (in the prior post and in mine) is that Lively's case is fairly thin as it's based on her interpretation of incidents that could certainly be read another way. And Baldoni's complaint mostly offers other, less alarming, characterizations of these exchanges.

However even after reading his characterizations of these incidents, I don't get the sense that she is "lying." Some of this stuff is weird and inappropriate even if not done with the intent to harass or violate boundaries. Other stuff seems like not a big deal and it seems like Lively overreacted. There definitely seems to have been miscommunication at various times and I sense these are two people who don't communicate or listen very well.

Mostly it makes me wonder what other people felt or saw on the set or if present during these interactions. I think it's a tough one because a film set is not a normal workplace. But I also think even on a film set, you shouldn't have to give up your privacy and you should be able to put some boundaries. It's very much a she said/he said and I don't feel either of them has made a super compelling case that they are right and the other person is wrong. There is enough there that I think it's possible Lively was harassed or at least made to feel very uncomfortable and that Wayfarer insufficiently responded to her complaints. I also think it's possible she's overreacting to a lot of this. But it could go either way. I wasn't there. It's very hard to judge.

I don't think Baldoni has come up with enough evidence to prove she manufactured this whole thing. He's characterizing the situations differently but not necessarily challenging the underlying facts. It's a tough one.


Thanks for tacking on - all great points (and I apologize to everyone for my horrendous spelling of parties’ names.)
Anonymous
Any podcast recs that summarize this whole debacle? I don’t have time for 60 pages but I’m growing curious about the whole story. Thanks in advance!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.


Did she lie/omit info, or did she present the facts the way she saw them, in the light most favorable to her?

Did she claim Baldoni said anything he didn't say, or did anything he didn't do? Because I don't think she did.


And that is why your many posts have no influence with the majority of us. Because yes, he has documentation that proves that she lied.


You know what, whatever. Let's see what happens in the case. Some of you are reading an amended complaint like it's the Bible and salivating over the idea that "Blake lied" based on nothing but an opposing filing. Okay. Enjoy. Lose your minds, call an evil, ugly liar online. It's obviously meeting some need you have to do this. Knock yourselves out.

Let's see what truth comes out when there is full discovery, actual footage comes out, witnesses are deposed, etc. I think both complaints are skewing the truth, and I think if the truth ever actually comes out, that will be obvious. Just like it was obvious during Depp/Heard, when it was shown that Johnny Depp was in fact an abusive drunk but for some reason everyone was convinced that Amber Heard was a manipulative, conniving liar. Sound familiar?


Yes you have said this many times and we don’t find it convincing. The evidence that has been public is insurmountable for her.


Who is "we"?


The majority of the people,posting here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Baldoni is the ideal client because he literally saved every text, voice mail and scrap of film. Talk about receipts.

On the other hand, I think Blake’s lawyers have opened themselves up to Rule 11 sanctions for the birthing scene allegations. The footnote dropped about what generally is worn in semi nude scenes is proof they knew that wasn’t what she was wearing— a hospital gown, pregnancy suit and underwear.


I actually don't think he Baldoni saved everything. I think he's benefitting from having been a producer and being part of Wayfarer, so there are dozens of people from whom he can get stuff because they work for him or with him.

Also, I don't think there is any Rule 11 exposure in Lively's lawsuit, sorry.


Clearly they knew she was fully clothed (underwear, pregnancy suit and robe). Had they not dropped the footnote, probably not. But that makes it clear they are part of an active misrepresentation to the Court.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Baldoni is the ideal client because he literally saved every text, voice mail and scrap of film. Talk about receipts.

On the other hand, I think Blake’s lawyers have opened themselves up to Rule 11 sanctions for the birthing scene allegations. The footnote dropped about what generally is worn in semi nude scenes is proof they knew that wasn’t what she was wearing— a hospital gown, pregnancy suit and underwear.


I actually don't think he Baldoni saved everything. I think he's benefitting from having been a producer and being part of Wayfarer, so there are dozens of people from whom he can get stuff because they work for him or with him.

Also, I don't think there is any Rule 11 exposure in Lively's lawsuit, sorry.


Clearly they knew she was fully clothed (underwear, pregnancy suit and robe). Had they not dropped the footnote, probably not. But that makes it clear they are part of an active misrepresentation to the Court.


I do not consider underwear, a fake belly, and a hospital gown to be "fully clothed." Especially not if the scene required my legs to be up in stirrups in a way that would obviously keep the gown from covering most of my body.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.


Did she lie/omit info, or did she present the facts the way she saw them, in the light most favorable to her?

Did she claim Baldoni said anything he didn't say, or did anything he didn't do? Because I don't think she did.


And that is why your many posts have no influence with the majority of us. Because yes, he has documentation that proves that she lied.


You know what, whatever. Let's see what happens in the case. Some of you are reading an amended complaint like it's the Bible and salivating over the idea that "Blake lied" based on nothing but an opposing filing. Okay. Enjoy. Lose your minds, call an evil, ugly liar online. It's obviously meeting some need you have to do this. Knock yourselves out.

Let's see what truth comes out when there is full discovery, actual footage comes out, witnesses are deposed, etc. I think both complaints are skewing the truth, and I think if the truth ever actually comes out, that will be obvious. Just like it was obvious during Depp/Heard, when it was shown that Johnny Depp was in fact an abusive drunk but for some reason everyone was convinced that Amber Heard was a manipulative, conniving liar. Sound familiar?


Yes you have said this many times and we don’t find it convincing. The evidence that has been public is insurmountable for her.


Who is "we"?


The majority of the people,posting here.


Unless you are coordinating your posts with other people, you have no idea (1) how many people are posting, or (2) which posts belong to which poster.

Are you coordinating your posts with other people?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Baldoni is the ideal client because he literally saved every text, voice mail and scrap of film. Talk about receipts.

On the other hand, I think Blake’s lawyers have opened themselves up to Rule 11 sanctions for the birthing scene allegations. The footnote dropped about what generally is worn in semi nude scenes is proof they knew that wasn’t what she was wearing— a hospital gown, pregnancy suit and underwear.


I actually don't think he Baldoni saved everything. I think he's benefitting from having been a producer and being part of Wayfarer, so there are dozens of people from whom he can get stuff because they work for him or with him.

Also, I don't think there is any Rule 11 exposure in Lively's lawsuit, sorry.


Clearly they knew she was fully clothed (underwear, pregnancy suit and robe). Had they not dropped the footnote, probably not. But that makes it clear they are part of an active misrepresentation to the Court.


I do not consider underwear, a fake belly, and a hospital gown to be "fully clothed." Especially not if the scene required my legs to be up in stirrups in a way that would obviously keep the gown from covering most of my body.


Most people do wear ski bibs in childbirth and birthing scenes.

Wait…. Did that birth scene get slipped in like so much pornography into the script when her back was turned?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.


Did she lie/omit info, or did she present the facts the way she saw them, in the light most favorable to her?

Did she claim Baldoni said anything he didn't say, or did anything he didn't do? Because I don't think she did.


And that is why your many posts have no influence with the majority of us. Because yes, he has documentation that proves that she lied.


You know what, whatever. Let's see what happens in the case. Some of you are reading an amended complaint like it's the Bible and salivating over the idea that "Blake lied" based on nothing but an opposing filing. Okay. Enjoy. Lose your minds, call an evil, ugly liar online. It's obviously meeting some need you have to do this. Knock yourselves out.

Let's see what truth comes out when there is full discovery, actual footage comes out, witnesses are deposed, etc. I think both complaints are skewing the truth, and I think if the truth ever actually comes out, that will be obvious. Just like it was obvious during Depp/Heard, when it was shown that Johnny Depp was in fact an abusive drunk but for some reason everyone was convinced that Amber Heard was a manipulative, conniving liar. Sound familiar?


Yes you have said this many times and we don’t find it convincing. The evidence that has been public is insurmountable for her.


Who is "we"?


The majority of the people,posting here.


Unless you are coordinating your posts with other people, you have no idea (1) how many people are posting, or (2) which posts belong to which poster.

Are you coordinating your posts with other people?


You are the one who has been squawking about the majority of this board being pro JB. It isn’t due to inability to read your many posts.
And of course I am not coordinating with anyone else. But I can identify the number of posts that I didn’t write that take a similar position.
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: