Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.[/quote] Did she lie/omit info, or did she present the facts the way she saw them, in the light most favorable to her? Did she claim Baldoni said anything he didn't say, or did anything he didn't do? Because I don't think she did.[/quote] And that is why your many posts have no influence with the majority of us. Because yes, he has documentation that proves that she lied.[/quote] You know what, whatever. Let's see what happens in the case. Some of you are reading an amended complaint like it's the Bible and salivating over the idea that "Blake lied" based on nothing but an opposing filing. Okay. Enjoy. Lose your minds, call an evil, ugly liar online. It's obviously meeting some need you have to do this. Knock yourselves out. Let's see what truth comes out when there is full discovery, actual footage comes out, witnesses are deposed, etc. I think both complaints are skewing the truth, and I think if the truth ever actually comes out, that will be obvious. Just like it was obvious during Depp/Heard, when it was shown that Johnny Depp was in fact an abusive drunk but for some reason everyone was convinced that Amber Heard was a manipulative, conniving liar. Sound familiar?[/quote] Yes you have said this many times and we don’t find it convincing. The evidence that has been public is insurmountable for her.[/quote] Who is "we"?[/quote] The majority of the people,posting here.[/quote] Unless you are coordinating your posts with other people, you have no idea (1) how many people are posting, or (2) which posts belong to which poster. Are you coordinating your posts with other people?[/quote] You are the one who has been squawking about the majority of this board being pro JB. It isn’t due to inability to read your many posts. And of course I am not coordinating with anyone else. But I can identify the number of posts that I didn’t write that take a similar position.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics