Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Ok so the bots are pro JB? Lemme get this straight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

My point was that the online pile on against Lively resembles the one against Heard very strongly, and that the way Baldoni's PR team (who also worked for Depp against Heard) and his lawyer have approached the situation really capitalizes on how so many people online are eager to pillory a woman, call her a liar, call her crazy.

DCUM has maybe a few hundred people following this thread at best. Reddit has a few pro Baldoni and pro Blakey dedicated subs, but the largest “general” celeb sub, Fau Moi, has over 4 million members and is largely pro Blake.

Reddit is fake. It’s 99% bots.

Ridiculous and untrue

[Anonymous]

We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.

She also lied about the set being closed for the birthing scene, who was present on set, and what she was wearing. All easily disprovable facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.

She also lied about the set being closed for the birthing scene, who was present on set, and what she was wearing. All easily disprovable facts.

DP from the prior two posters and not a bot - yes. She was remarkably dishonest throughout the filming. I’ve enjoyed the conversation on LSA which absolutely has the players dead to rights. And her reputation as a much more famous person is directly relevant because she set all of this off because she was deluded about her own popularity and angry that her hair and drink lines were not immediate smashing successes, and decided the movie publicity was at fault.

I honestly feel like I’m taking crazy pills. Feminism and our innate right to dignity at work is not the story here. She had two female ADs f’ing fired and the correspondence of the director and producers being upset about this is all over, unedited, online. She’s extraordinarily dishonest and abusive, not the reverse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is so weird. It's like MAGA, but for Baldoni. Agree with PP that it's got all the misogyny of the Heard/Depp thread. And yet people are so absolutely certain that their hatred of this woman is well merited. Forget it, Jake, its Chinatown.

I like how you Blake bots are so rattled you think this must be an inorganic conspiracy. No sweetie. People have eyes, ears, common sense and critical thinking. We have read all the facts, we can look at Blake and Ryan’s 20 year careers, and we can draw our own conclusions. That said, I understand how this can be very unsettling to two filthy rich narcissist sociopaths who live in a gilded bubble and are used to cowering yes-men and women and servants waiting on them hand and foot.

And if someone is so deluded to believe that they look like an innocent 23 year old when they are a matronly looking 38 or whatever, they deserve the criticism. She was not a good fit for this role. Acting is a superficial business, you have to have a thick skin. It’s not for everyone.

Great example of how the rhetoric against Lively on here is bizarrely misogynist. Lively was hired to play the role, her hire was made by Baldoni and his producing partners and approved of by the author of the book it was based on. If you think she was miscast, fine, but she is the age she is, she looks how she looks. She didn't mislead anyone about her appearance, and they knew she'd be just a few months postpartum when they filmed. But you are calling her deluded for... taking a job she was offered and that the production company seemed to be thrilled for her to have? Okay.

I notice no one ever gets mad about the fact that Baldoni ALSO looks way older than the book character he played (noting here that they purposefully aged both characters up for the movie because it makes no sense for a neurosurgeon to be in his late 20s, and Lively is still several years younger than Baldoni). Interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.

She also lied about the set being closed for the birthing scene, who was present on set, and what she was wearing. All easily disprovable facts.

Have you seen footage of the scene being filmed? No. So actually you are saying she lied because he alleges a narrative different than she does. But all he has is a call sheet. That's not proof of anything. That means the set was supposed to be closed. Was it? Of course he's going to claim it was. Of course he's going to say she was "fully clothed" (just as a point of order, I would not consider myself fully clothed if I was wearing a pair of pair of underwear briefs and a hospital gown partially draped over me while sitting in stirrups). Of course he's going to claim everyone who was on set that day was supposed to be there.

You are assuming his narrative is the correct one and she is "lying" because.... his narrative came out second? He provided a call sheet that doesn't actually prove anything? Why?

You don't actually know what happened. You don't know if she's lying, or he's lying, or they are both spinning the truth and it's actually something else (which is what I think is most likely the case).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is so weird. It's like MAGA, but for Baldoni. Agree with PP that it's got all the misogyny of the Heard/Depp thread. And yet people are so absolutely certain that their hatred of this woman is well merited. Forget it, Jake, its Chinatown.

I like how you Blake bots are so rattled you think this must be an inorganic conspiracy. No sweetie. People have eyes, ears, common sense and critical thinking. We have read all the facts, we can look at Blake and Ryan’s 20 year careers, and we can draw our own conclusions. That said, I understand how this can be very unsettling to two filthy rich narcissist sociopaths who live in a gilded bubble and are used to cowering yes-men and women and servants waiting on them hand and foot.

Why would a bot be "rattled"?

If people were posting here because they were being paid to do so, it would not upset them.

I know it's very hard for you to understand (perhaps because you are a bot?) but some people just don't agree with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.

She also lied about the set being closed for the birthing scene, who was present on set, and what she was wearing. All easily disprovable facts.

DP from the prior two posters and not a bot - yes. She was remarkably dishonest throughout the filming. I’ve enjoyed the conversation on LSA which absolutely has the players dead to rights. And her reputation as a much more famous person is directly relevant because she set all of this off because she was deluded about her own popularity and angry that her hair and drink lines were not immediate smashing successes, and decided the movie publicity was at fault.

I honestly feel like I’m taking crazy pills. Feminism and our innate right to dignity at work is not the story here. She had two female ADs f’ing fired and the correspondence of the director and producers being upset about this is all over, unedited, online. She’s extraordinarily dishonest and abusive, not the reverse.

What is LSA?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.

Did she lie/omit info, or did she present the facts the way she saw them, in the light most favorable to her?

Did she claim Baldoni said anything he didn't say, or did anything he didn't do? Because I don't think she did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.

She also lied about the set being closed for the birthing scene, who was present on set, and what she was wearing. All easily disprovable facts.

Have you seen footage of the scene being filmed? No. So actually you are saying she lied because he alleges a narrative different than she does. But all he has is a call sheet. That's not proof of anything. That means the set was supposed to be closed. Was it? Of course he's going to claim it was. Of course he's going to say she was "fully clothed" (just as a point of order, I would not consider myself fully clothed if I was wearing a pair of pair of underwear briefs and a hospital gown partially draped over me while sitting in stirrups). Of course he's going to claim everyone who was on set that day was supposed to be there.

You are assuming his narrative is the correct one and she is "lying" because.... his narrative came out second? He provided a call sheet that doesn't actually prove anything? Why?

You don't actually know what happened. You don't know if she's lying, or he's lying, or they are both spinning the truth and it's actually something else (which is what I think is most likely the case).

How. Is. That. Not. Proof. Do the good people of a mommy board in DC need to have been on set? This is crazy. He has documentation contravening what she said, babe. It’s going to be her word against his and it seems far more likely than not he’ll have additional witness averred statements. Holy sht. You are weighing her claims as having more likely truth than his claims when he has documents backing his claims! Wow.

[Anonymous]

Baldoni is the ideal client because he literally saved every text, voice mail and scrap of film. Talk about receipts.

On the other hand, I think Blake’s lawyers have opened themselves up to Rule 11 sanctions for the birthing scene allegations. The footnote dropped about what generally is worn in semi nude scenes is proof they knew that wasn’t what she was wearing— a hospital gown, pregnancy suit and underwear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Baldoni is the ideal client because he literally saved every text, voice mail and scrap of film. Talk about receipts.

On the other hand, I think Blake’s lawyers have opened themselves up to Rule 11 sanctions for the birthing scene allegations. The footnote dropped about what generally is worn in semi nude scenes is proof they knew that wasn’t what she was wearing— a hospital gown, pregnancy suit and underwear.

Dropped a word, she was wearing a hospital gown, pregnancy suit and underwear. I don’t think there is anyone other than her most steadfast partisans that stilll believe she was forced to keep her feet in the stirrups when they weren’t filming. Blake doesn’t even allege that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.

Did she lie/omit info, or did she present the facts the way she saw them, in the light most favorable to her?

Did she claim Baldoni said anything he didn't say, or did anything he didn't do? Because I don't think she did.

And that is why your many posts have no influence with the majority of us. Because yes, he has documentation that proves that she lied.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.

She also lied about the set being closed for the birthing scene, who was present on set, and what she was wearing. All easily disprovable facts.

Have you seen footage of the scene being filmed? No. So actually you are saying she lied because he alleges a narrative different than she does. But all he has is a call sheet. That's not proof of anything. That means the set was supposed to be closed. Was it? Of course he's going to claim it was. Of course he's going to say she was "fully clothed" (just as a point of order, I would not consider myself fully clothed if I was wearing a pair of pair of underwear briefs and a hospital gown partially draped over me while sitting in stirrups). Of course he's going to claim everyone who was on set that day was supposed to be there.

You are assuming his narrative is the correct one and she is "lying" because.... his narrative came out second? He provided a call sheet that doesn't actually prove anything? Why?

You don't actually know what happened. You don't know if she's lying, or he's lying, or they are both spinning the truth and it's actually something else (which is what I think is most likely the case).

How. Is. That. Not. Proof. Do the good people of a mommy board in DC need to have been on set? This is crazy. He has documentation contravening what she said, babe. It’s going to be her word against his and it seems far more likely than not he’ll have additional witness averred statements. Holy sht. You are weighing her claims as having more likely truth than his claims when he has documents backing his claims! Wow.

Don't call me babe. Ever.

A document announcing the set was closed is proof that the set was supposed to be closed. Lively alleges there were people on set who were not supposed to be there. The document does not disprove that. It's proof, but not definitive. You can say "oh it's more likely he has witnesses." Okay, let's hear from witnesses. But the call sheet does not alone disprove everything she's saying. It's a piece of paper.

I never said I think her claims are more likely to be truthful. I'm saying I don't know and neither do you. He has one document that doesn't really prove anything.

Wow./s