Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We know that Blake lied and omitted information about the dance scene. This is not he said/she said. It’s like bizarro world here.[/quote] She also lied about the set being closed for the birthing scene, who was present on set, and what she was wearing. All easily disprovable facts.[/quote] Have you seen footage of the scene being filmed? No. So actually you are saying she lied because he alleges a narrative different than she does. But all he has is a call sheet. That's not proof of anything. That means the set was supposed to be closed. Was it? Of course he's going to claim it was. Of course he's going to say she was "fully clothed" (just as a point of order, I would not consider myself fully clothed if I was wearing a pair of pair of underwear briefs and a hospital gown partially draped over me while sitting in stirrups). Of course he's going to claim everyone who was on set that day was supposed to be there. You are assuming his narrative is the correct one and she is "lying" because.... his narrative came out second? He provided a call sheet that doesn't actually prove anything? Why? You don't actually know what happened. You don't know if she's lying, or he's lying, or they are both spinning the truth and it's actually something else (which is what I think is most likely the case).[/quote] How. Is. That. Not. Proof. Do the good people of a mommy board in DC need to have been on set? This is crazy. He has documentation contravening what she said, babe. It’s going to be her word against his and it seems far more likely than not he’ll have additional witness averred statements. Holy sht. You are weighing her claims as having more likely truth than his claims when he has documents backing his claims! Wow.[/quote] Don't call me babe. Ever. A document announcing the set was closed is proof that the set was supposed to be closed. Lively alleges there were people on set who were not supposed to be there. The document does not disprove that. It's proof, but not definitive. You can say "oh it's more likely he has witnesses." Okay, let's hear from witnesses. But the call sheet does not alone disprove everything she's saying. It's a piece of paper. I never said I think her claims are more likely to be truthful. I'm saying I don't know and neither do you. He has one document that doesn't really prove anything. Wow./s[/quote] Actually he has many documents. And she has some texts taken out of context.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics