Can I sue Callie Oettinger?

[Anonymous]

Boy, Callie has been busy posting on here. I hope to see FCPS and Callie's story plastered all over the news. Please do not think for a second Callie gives a F about your kids. She sold out 35,000 kids to make a point. That is not a victim, not a hero, not an advocate and not a whistleblower. Hopefully it makes her a defendant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Callie hadn't distributed it maybe it would just be FCPS, but she is now involved as someone who distributed data that they shouldn't have.

whis·tle-blow·er
/ˈ(h)wisəl ˌblō(ə)r/
noun
noun: whistleblower
a person who informs on a person or organization engaged in an illicit activity.

Umm no. It wasn't illicit until she asked for the information and took it. She's part of the illicit activity. Are you saying she did this intentionally?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FCPS will need to compensate the victims I would recommend suing FCPS as they released the information.

We’re a victim family here and a day or so ago received postcards about joint a settlement […] Honestly I didn’t finish reading it, as i assumed it was regarding this unauthorized information release. (Oh…the compensation was $50.) 🤣

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Callie hadn't distributed it maybe it would just be FCPS, but she is now involved as someone who distributed data that they shouldn't have.

whis·tle-blow·er
/ˈ(h)wisəl ˌblō(ə)r/
noun
noun: whistleblower
a person who informs on a person or organization engaged in an illicit activity.

Umm no. It wasn't illicit until she asked for the information and took it. She's part of the illicit activity. Are you saying she did this intentionally?

She asked for info about her child. She was given info for 35000 children. This isn’t that hard to understand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Callie hadn't distributed it maybe it would just be FCPS, but she is now involved as someone who distributed data that they shouldn't have.

whis·tle-blow·er
/ˈ(h)wisəl ˌblō(ə)r/
noun
noun: whistleblower
a person who informs on a person or organization engaged in an illicit activity.

Umm no. It wasn't illicit until she asked for the information and took it. She's part of the illicit activity. Are you saying she did this intentionally?

She asked for info about her child. She was given info for 35000 children. This isn’t that hard to understand.

Interesting. That actually sounds about right. $1,750,000 to the affected families and $1,750,000 to the attorneys. Too bad the justice system doesn’t work that fast.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Boy, Callie has been busy posting on here. I hope to see FCPS and Callie's story plastered all over the news. Please do not think for a second Callie gives a F about your kids. She sold out 35,000 kids to make a point. That is not a victim, not a hero, not an advocate and not a whistleblower. Hopefully it makes her a defendant.

Only in your head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am truly impressed by Callie's unwavering dedication and bravery in standing up to FCPS. Her commitment to advocating for what she believes in is commendable and serves as an inspiration to us all. Kudos to you, Callie!

+1000

Read what the judge said after she was sued by FCPS for doing this before. FCPS turned around and did the same thing again!

+5000. This group is the very definition of if a tree falls in the forest. They don’t care if fcps is leaking it as long as they don’t know about it.

+1000

It’s been brought to court, FCPS sued Callie to get records removed from her website, and the judge sided with Callie. The information was legally obtained so it’s hers. This is a second time for FCPS to screw up with giving Callie other kids’ information! How stupid of them.

Have you read what’s out there? All of it? Do that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone wiling to share an attorney that will take on any kind of legal action against Callie?

I talked to mine yesterday. Nothing to do. Besides I haven’t found any identifiable information about my daughter anywhere nor would I be able to prove damages from it. I’m moving on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Callie hadn't distributed it maybe it would just be FCPS, but she is now involved as someone who distributed data that they shouldn't have.

whis·tle-blow·er
/ˈ(h)wisəl ˌblō(ə)r/
noun
noun: whistleblower
a person who informs on a person or organization engaged in an illicit activity.

Umm no. It wasn't illicit until she asked for the information and took it. She's part of the illicit activity. Are you saying she did this intentionally?

She asked for info about her child. She was given info for 35000 children. This isn’t that hard to understand.

So then how is she a whistle-blower? How is she uncovering things that don't involve her directly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FCPS will need to compensate the victims I would recommend suing FCPS as they released the information.

We’re a victim family here and a day or so ago received postcards about joint a settlement […] Honestly I didn’t finish reading it, as i assumed it was regarding this unauthorized information release. (Oh…the compensation was $50.) 🤣

No it wasn't. There is no compensation set up. You are making stuff up

[Anonymous]

https://specialeducationaction.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/VDOE-10.6.21-Systemic-Complaint-Notice-of-Complaint_Redacted.pdf

She’s tried. They’re stupid or careless?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone wiling to share an attorney that will take on any kind of legal action against Callie?

I talked to mine yesterday. Nothing to do. Besides I haven’t found any identifiable information about my daughter anywhere nor would I be able to prove damages from it. I’m moving on.

Someone who did the smart thing. Contacted an attorney who gave you sound advice vs. getting groupthinked by a wishful thinking group of idiots who watched one too many episodes of Matlock, and think that makes them the world’s greatest legal minds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://specialeducationaction.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/VDOE-10.6.21-Systemic-Complaint-Notice-of-Complaint_Redacted.pdf

She’s tried. They’re stupid or careless?

Both.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Callie hadn't distributed it maybe it would just be FCPS, but she is now involved as someone who distributed data that they shouldn't have.

whis·tle-blow·er
/ˈ(h)wisəl ˌblō(ə)r/
noun
noun: whistleblower
a person who informs on a person or organization engaged in an illicit activity.

hy·poc·ri·sy
/həˈpäkrəsē/
noun
noun: hypocrisy; plural noun: hypocrisies
the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform

victim blaming
noun
/ˈvɪktɪm bleɪmɪŋ/
/ˈvɪktɪm bleɪmɪŋ/
[uncountable]
​the practice of saying or implying that a person who has suffered harm or injury is responsible for it, rather than the person who caused the harm or injury

[Anonymous]

​

the practice of saying or implying that a person who has suffered harm or injury is responsible for it, rather than the person who caused the harm or injury

My kids are the victim of Callie. Neither they, or their parents, gave Callie permission to share their data.