Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kirk always looked like he was about to explode. Coke rage or hate rage.

Not at all.
Quite the opposite.
There is a reason people refer to him as a “happy warrior.”

Well he knows he's in front of the camera. Behind closed doors though...

How the hell would you know anything about Charlie Kirk “behind closed doors?” You wouldn’t. You just need to come here and shit post.

We know that he hated those not like him and had to bottle it up since the cameras were watching. It's hard to keep a lid on that much pent up anger. Serenity now, serenity now.

In other words you know squat since everything you said is false.

There's ample evidence on previous pages that Kirk had hate for those not like him. Kirk, as an influencer first and foremost, was very aware of the cameras. The rest follows.

His org was in no way grass roots. It was backed by the uber wealthy so astroturfed would be accurate.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kirk always looked like he was about to explode. Coke rage or hate rage.

Not at all.
Quite the opposite.
There is a reason people refer to him as a “happy warrior.”

DP. He always had a grimace on his face. Even when debating conservatives. The only time I saw him actually look like he was having fun was once when he was debating a beautiful young woman (not on campus, one of those roundtable debates) and he kept cutting her off and she said 8-9x “can I speak?” He thought it was flirting or fun, but she was pissed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Patel admitted the text chain released earlier was fabricated since the original was lost.

This kid is going to walk.

We need a citation for this claim.

No, you don't because ut wouldn't change your opinion anyway. You fools are immune to facts, and people should stop wasting time on you.

Facts? Hilarious given how that pp is obviously lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Patel admitted the text chain released earlier was fabricated since the original was lost.

This kid is going to walk.

What? Where did he admit this?

I’m the poster who theorized this morning that it was a stylized creation by police based on the boyfriend’s memory because the original messages were encrypted and probably erased.

Nailed it.

No freaking way. They put out a fabricated confession!

Of course. They’re a clown act. Days ago, I said it was obviously fake and Patel’s stupidity and arrogance was going to get this kid off the hook.

Government is serious work for serious people. These jokers are all cosplay and grift.

PP has provided no citation for her claim. Until she does, I don’t believe her.

Lol your side doesn't care about citations. Get out of here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Patel admitted the text chain released earlier was fabricated since the original was lost.

This kid is going to walk.

We need a citation for this claim.

No, you don't because ut wouldn't change your opinion anyway. You fools are immune to facts, and people should stop wasting time on you.

Facts? Hilarious given how that pp is obviously lying.

Obviously lying? You have proof that it's a lie?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kirk always looked like he was about to explode. Coke rage or hate rage.

Not at all.
Quite the opposite.
There is a reason people refer to him as a “happy warrior.”

Well he knows he's in front of the camera. Behind closed doors though...

How the hell would you know anything about Charlie Kirk “behind closed doors?” You wouldn’t. You just need to come here and shit post.

We know that he hated those not like him and had to bottle it up since the cameras were watching. It's hard to keep a lid on that much pent up anger. Serenity now, serenity now.

In other words you know squat since everything you said is false.

There's ample evidence on previous pages that Kirk had hate for those not like him. Kirk, as an influencer first and foremost, was very aware of the cameras. The rest follows.

His org was in no way grass roots. It was backed by the uber wealthy so astroturfed would be accurate.

You can't prove anything to these idiots. Stop wasting your time on their suggestions that they give a flying fvk about truth and facts. They don't. They enjoy sending you in circles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Patel admitted the text chain released earlier was fabricated since the original was lost.

This kid is going to walk.

We need a citation for this claim.

No, you don't because ut wouldn't change your opinion anyway. You fools are immune to facts, and people should stop wasting time on you.

Facts? Hilarious given how that pp is obviously lying.

Obviously lying? You have proof that it's a lie?

She has shown NO proof that it’s true.

[Anonymous]

Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on the roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Patel admitted the text chain released earlier was fabricated since the original was lost.

This kid is going to walk.

We need a citation for this claim.

No, you don't because ut wouldn't change your opinion anyway. You fools are immune to facts, and people should stop wasting time on you.

Facts? Hilarious given how that pp is obviously lying.

Obviously lying? You have proof that it's a lie?

She has shown NO proof that it’s true.

And? You're the one suggesting it isn't true. I assume that means you have evidence showing that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on the roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

Someone said they didn’t do an autopsy. Even a crappy public defender will have enough to go on with this ineptitude.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on the roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

Someone said they didn’t do an autopsy. Even a crappy public defender will have enough to go on with this ineptitude.

This and everything else along with the fake-ish videos of his wife. Makes you really question if Kirk’s dead at all?

[Anonymous]

Why was zero protocol followed?

[Anonymous]

It’s like the rules didn’t apply to whomever was making the decisions after he was shot. Who were these people? The bodyguards most likely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on theank roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

Good God! You are insufferable!
THEY WERE TRYING TO SAVE HIS LIFE? Let me be clear - when they moved him, they thought he was still alive. Get it?
And, you think they dissembled the crime scene before it was investigated? Think again. Idiot.