Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why was zero protocol followed?

I’m pp re autopsy and I didn’t even think about the angle of the tent and the roof. The FBI is truly incompetent. Yes, you would think they would have immediately gone to roof and seen if they could see his stool from there. If they had done the autopsy they could do a ballistics examination to confirm where the bullet entered to build the case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on theank roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

Good God! You are insufferable!
THEY WERE TRYING TO SAVE HIS LIFE? Let me be clear - when they moved him, they thought he was still alive. Get it?
And, you think they dissembled the crime scene before it was investigated? Think again. Idiot.

I’m pp. it looks like a lot was already taken from the tent in that pic.

[Anonymous]

There’s not even blood on the ground.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on theank roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

Good God! You are insufferable!
THEY WERE TRYING TO SAVE HIS LIFE? Let me be clear - when they moved him, they thought he was still alive. Get it?
And, you think they dissembled the crime scene before it was investigated? Think again. Idiot.

I’m pp. it looks like a lot was already taken from the tent in that pic.

the cameras were taken almost immediately

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kirk always looked like he was about to explode. Coke rage or hate rage.

Not at all.
Quite the opposite.
There is a reason people refer to him as a “happy warrior.”

I guess you can be a happy misogynist and racist, to say one of the most qualified and experienced SCOTUS nominees of the last 50 years "lacked the brainpower" and was an "affirmative action hire" who "took a slot from a white man" just because she's a black woman.

He said it on his show, he tweeted it, he absolutely is a misogynist and a racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There’s not even blood on the ground.

I keep fixating on this. While I understand a clean shot won’t result in a splattered mess, this was a clean shot apparently straight into the carotid supposedly. I don’t know, deer hunters can vouch for the fact that not all shots are messy. Now could this clean of a shot be done from high up on the roof, with Kirk sitting under a low to the ground tent??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Patel admitted the text chain released earlier was fabricated since the original was lost.

This kid is going to walk.

What? Where did he admit this?

I’m the poster who theorized this morning that it was a stylized creation by police based on the boyfriend’s memory because the original messages were encrypted and probably erased.

Nailed it.

No freaking way. They put out a fabricated confession!

Of course. They’re a clown act. Days ago, I said it was obviously fake and Patel’s stupidity and arrogance was going to get this kid off the hook.

Government is serious work for serious people. These jokers are all cosplay and grift.

PP has provided no citation for her claim. Until she does, I don’t believe her.

Lol your side doesn't care about citations. Get out of here.

Even right wingers like Steve Bannon and Candace Owens think the text messages are fishy and sound fake and scripted. Even MAGA sycophants and hateful liberal bashers like Catturd are skeptical of the Robinson text messages.

https://www.newsweek.com/tyler-robinson-lance-twiggs-texts-charlie-kirk-2131025

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s not even blood on the ground.

I keep fixating on this. While I understand a clean shot won’t result in a splattered mess, this was a clean shot apparently straight into the carotid supposedly. I don’t know, deer hunters can vouch for the fact that not all shots are messy. Now could this clean of a shot be done from high up on the roof, with Kirk sitting under a low to the ground tent??

And Kirk was sitting towards the mid-back of the tent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Patel admitted the text chain released earlier was fabricated since the original was lost.

This kid is going to walk.

What? Where did he admit this?

I’m the poster who theorized this morning that it was a stylized creation by police based on the boyfriend’s memory because the original messages were encrypted and probably erased.

Nailed it.

No freaking way. They put out a fabricated confession!

Of course. They’re a clown act. Days ago, I said it was obviously fake and Patel’s stupidity and arrogance was going to get this kid off the hook.

Government is serious work for serious people. These jokers are all cosplay and grift.

PP has provided no citation for her claim. Until she does, I don’t believe her.

Lol your side doesn't care about citations. Get out of here.

Even right wingers like Steve Bannon and Candace Owens think the text messages are fishy and sound fake and scripted. Even MAGA sycophants and hateful liberal bashers like Catturd are skeptical of the Robinson text messages.

https://www.newsweek.com/tyler-robinson-lance-twiggs-texts-charlie-kirk-2131025

So you are in the same camp as Owens and Bannon? Good to know.

[Anonymous]

I am doubtful Charlie would even be visible to anyone in the roof while sitting towards the back of the tiny low tent.

[Anonymous]

The spot where the tent was located was the lowest spot, the entire area descends towards the tiny tent. Really, someone should do a simulation, CSI/the FBI should have, I don’t think you could see a person sitting towards the back of the tent while high up on the roof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie was sitting under a small, low to the ground tent. Still boggles the mind how anyone on theank roof would be able to get that shot. Perhaps the crime scene shouldn’t have been disassembled immediately and CSI could have explained. Was no one aware of proper protocol? The bodyguards didn’t understand or know that you don’t move a murder victim and take down a crime scene? They didn’t know this? What is their training? What did they all do prior to this job guarding Kirk so well?

Good God! You are insufferable!
THEY WERE TRYING TO SAVE HIS LIFE? Let me be clear - when they moved him, they thought he was still alive. Get it?
And, you think they dissembled the crime scene before it was investigated? Think again. Idiot.

I’m pp. it looks like a lot was already taken from the tent in that pic.

Where is all the blood?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s not even blood on the ground.

I keep fixating on this. While I understand a clean shot won’t result in a splattered mess, this was a clean shot apparently straight into the carotid supposedly. I don’t know, deer hunters can vouch for the fact that not all shots are messy. Now could this clean of a shot be done from high up on the roof, with Kirk sitting under a low to the ground tent??

Did you see the video? He was losing a lot of blood immediately. The blood should be somewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s not even blood on the ground.

I keep fixating on this. While I understand a clean shot won’t result in a splattered mess, this was a clean shot apparently straight into the carotid supposedly. I don’t know, deer hunters can vouch for the fact that not all shots are messy. Now could this clean of a shot be done from high up on the roof, with Kirk sitting under a low to the ground tent??

Did you see the video? He was losing a lot of blood immediately. The blood should be somewhere.

Agree there would be blood on their shoes, etc. there would essentially be about 5 litres of blood around the scene.

[Anonymous]

Were there any bloody footprints while they were taking him to throw into the back of the truck?