Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

[Anonymous]

Above poster: could you please provide the link that other leaders called for Shokin's removal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Above poster: could you please provide the link that other leaders called for Shokin's removal?

Google it. Really this isn't hard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain to me what does “personal gain” for Trump means in this story? We know Biden have not done anything wrong. If Ukrainian government going to confirm this, as they should on Trumps request, what is the personal gain for Trump? It seems that it will make Biden’s position much stronger, right? Does Trump wants Biden nomination over Warren? Is this the personal gain? Or I am missing something?

No, we don't.

Sure we do. Whether Trump thinks Biden did something wrong or knows that he didn't (and there's no telling what Trump knows or thinks anymore), he's asking Ukraine to "find" dirt and give it to him. He wants Ukraine to make up some dirt and give it to him. That's his personal gain.

But this is not what he asked. He asked to investigate. The investigation would probably result in finding no illegal activity on the part of Biden. Why all Democrats and liberal media call Biden’s activities a dirt? It’s like finding him guilty before the investigation?

Maybe it is because we all know the investigation into the company happened two years before Hunter joined the board and there was no finding of wrongdoing. Maybe we also understand that the world was happy that the US - Biden was the messenger - led the way on getting a bad special prosecutor out of the way so Ukraine could further reform. GOP senators were universally happy about this at the time. There was never any sens of wrong doing, Hunter's involvement was clear by White House and other ethics attornies, and the whole thing is simply manufactured to muddy the 2020 waters. The tell is that team Trump is using the exact same tactics as they did with Trump-Russia, only this time, the public has already seen it and knows it is a smokescreen.

This is how Trump operates. Say something (and/or get cronies to say something) that isn't true but the details of which are complicated (or not reported on) enough for the average person to think there might be some truth to it. I don't even feel bad anymore for people who are too dumb to see this.

[Anonymous]

Amazing how posters want to talk about ANYTHING other than Trump’s illegal, immoral, unethical conduct, and are willing to take a deep dive into Ukrainian politics to deflect from the topic at hand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amazing how posters want to talk about ANYTHING other than Trump’s illegal, immoral, unethical conduct, and are willing to take a deep dive into Ukrainian politics to deflect from the topic at hand.

Bengazi
Emailzzz
UraniumOne
Wiretapping
NunesMemo


Anything but governing the country.

[Anonymous]

I would posit that an innocent person wouldn't threaten civil war, murder and treason as fallout for an impeachment inquiry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amazing how posters want to talk about ANYTHING other than Trump’s illegal, immoral, unethical conduct, and are willing to take a deep dive into Ukrainian politics to deflect from the topic at hand.

+1.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would posit that an innocent person wouldn't threaten civil war, murder and treason as fallout for an impeachment inquiry.

He doesn't even have to threaten. Rolling Thunder plans a HUGE presence in DC if the President is impeached. I'm sure they will be joined by many others. You see, you can't disenfranchise people by taking away their vote with made up stories.

Bring it. See what happens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Above poster: could you please provide the link that other leaders called for Shokin's removal?

Google it. Really this isn't hard.

I google European leaders asking for Shokin's resignation and nothing comes up. That's why I ask if you can provide a link. Thanks a lot!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would posit that an innocent person wouldn't threaten civil war, murder and treason as fallout for an impeachment inquiry.

He doesn't even have to threaten. Rolling Thunder plans a HUGE presence in DC if the President is impeached. I'm sure they will be joined by many others. You see, you can't disenfranchise people by taking away their vote with made up stories.

Bring it. See what happens.

Lol. This is it. The made up stories in the MSM disenfranchised the poor voters. Brawndo's got what plants crave!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would posit that an innocent person wouldn't threaten civil war, murder and treason as fallout for an impeachment inquiry.

He doesn't even have to threaten. Rolling Thunder plans a HUGE presence in DC if the President is impeached. I'm sure they will be joined by many others. You see, you can't disenfranchise people by taking away their vote with made up stories.

Bring it. See what happens.

Rolling Thunder? Do you mean the group of senior citizens who do not want to make a yearly trip here anymore?

THAT Rolling Thunder?

[Anonymous]

Gina Haspel would have been the one to approve the change on the whistleblower policy. Gina has close ties to John Brennan & 2 of Brennan's aides work directly under Haspel! The change was done in secret right before the Ukraine whistleblower 2nd hand info!

Interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would posit that an innocent person wouldn't threaten civil war, murder and treason as fallout for an impeachment inquiry.

He doesn't even have to threaten. Rolling Thunder plans a HUGE presence in DC if the President is impeached. I'm sure they will be joined by many others. You see, you can't disenfranchise people by taking away their vote with made up stories.

Bring it. See what happens.

Rolling Thunder? Do you mean the group of senior citizens who do not want to make a yearly trip here anymore?

THAT Rolling Thunder?

Do you remember who was at the climate change rally last week? The photos?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Above poster: could you please provide the link that other leaders called for Shokin's removal?

Only someone who never reads real journalism would not know that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would posit that an innocent person wouldn't threaten civil war, murder and treason as fallout for an impeachment inquiry.

He doesn't even have to threaten. Rolling Thunder plans a HUGE presence in DC if the President is impeached. I'm sure they will be joined by many others. You see, you can't disenfranchise people by taking away their vote with made up stories.

Bring it. See what happens.

Oh, no! Not Rolling Thunder!

Quick, guys, call off the impeachment!