Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

[Anonymous]

Covington Law Firm, Flynn's former representation, are now an interested party to the case.

This is going to get REALLY interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Washington. Examiner. Well that proves it

Well, all the legal documentation seems to be there. Are you going to dispute that also?


https://www.scribd.com/document/461271754/ODNI-Response-1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Covington Law Firm, Flynn's former representation, are now an interested party to the case.

This is going to get REALLY interesting.

Good. They have some things to answer for. Wonder if Eric Holder will be their representative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Covington Law Firm, Flynn's former representation, are now an interested party to the case.

This is going to get REALLY interesting.

Good. They have some things to answer for. Wonder if Eric Holder will be their representative.

Or vice versa.

Flynn is such a loon. All of this to avoid a year or two in prison? He would've been out by now if had just accepted his sentence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Covington Law Firm, Flynn's former representation, are now an interested party to the case.

This is going to get REALLY interesting.

Not a lawyer. What does this mean?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Covington Law Firm, Flynn's former representation, are now an interested party to the case.

This is going to get REALLY interesting.

Good. They have some things to answer for. Wonder if Eric Holder will be their representative.

Or vice versa.

Flynn is such a loon. All of this to avoid a year or two in prison? He would've been out by now if had just accepted his sentence.

If he's not guilty, he shouldn't. Good for him for fighting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Covington Law Firm, Flynn's former representation, are now an interested party to the case.

This is going to get REALLY interesting.

Good. They have some things to answer for. Wonder if Eric Holder will be their representative.

Or vice versa.

Flynn is such a loon. All of this to avoid a year or two in prison? He would've been out by now if had just accepted his sentence.

If he's not guilty, he shouldn't. Good for him for fighting.

He’s guilty. He said so himself multiple times in open court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Covington Law Firm, Flynn's former representation, are now an interested party to the case.

This is going to get REALLY interesting.

Did they file an amicus brief?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Covington Law Firm, Flynn's former representation, are now an interested party to the case.

This is going to get REALLY interesting.

Good. They have some things to answer for. Wonder if Eric Holder will be their representative.

Or vice versa.

Flynn is such a loon. All of this to avoid a year or two in prison? He would've been out by now if had just accepted his sentence.

If he's not guilty, he shouldn't. Good for him for fighting.

He's lied so many times, how can he keep track? Does he realize why Judge Sullivan has brought Covington in?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Covington Law Firm, Flynn's former representation, are now an interested party to the case.

This is going to get REALLY interesting.

Did they file an amicus brief?

The judge told them to file a notice of appearance.

[Anonymous]

Neither the prosecution nor the defense are against the dismissal of the case against Flynn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Neither the prosecution nor the defense are against the dismissal of the case against Flynn.

Exactly. Judge Sullivan seems to have his nose out of joint that the decision was essentially removed from his control. So, he has gone to Plan B.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Neither the prosecution nor the defense are against the dismissal of the case against Flynn.

There's only one reason not to dismiss the charges.

Starts with a J. Ends with an Ustice.

DOJ proved the facts of the case, Flynn swore to them, the judge accepted them, and Flynn has awaited sentencing for several years.

Then new prosecutors said the law is different (it's not) and to drop the charges. Very unusual. Would it be right to agree? How?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Neither the prosecution nor the defense are against the dismissal of the case against Flynn.

There's only one reason not to dismiss the charges.

Starts with a J. Ends with an Ustice.

DOJ proved the facts of the case, Flynn swore to them, the judge accepted them, and Flynn has awaited sentencing for several years.

Then new prosecutors said the law is different (it's not) and to drop the charges. Very unusual. Would it be right to agree? How?

If his first counsel was ineffective and made deals unknown to the court (and Flynn) and
the prosecution withheld Brady material and
there was no basis for an investigation to begin with........

Then, this is a travesty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Neither the prosecution nor the defense are against the dismissal of the case against Flynn.

There's only one reason not to dismiss the charges.

Starts with a J. Ends with an Ustice.

DOJ proved the facts of the case, Flynn swore to them, the judge accepted them, and Flynn has awaited sentencing for several years.

Then new prosecutors said the law is different (it's not) and to drop the charges. Very unusual. Would it be right to agree? How?

If his first counsel was ineffective and made deals unknown to the court (and Flynn) and
the prosecution withheld Brady material and
there was no basis for an investigation to begin with........

Then, this is a travesty.

We'll find out soon.