Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gen Zers are saying those text messages are no way written by Gen Zers.

I’m a Gen Xer and I don’t think those text messages were written by Gen Zers either. And people from the right (Candace Owens and Matt Walsh) to the left (Hasan Piker) agree with me. I’m a liberal, I’m not a conspiracy theorist AT ALL, I don’t think that Netanyahu killed him, but those texts are sketchy AF.

I mean, the texts even include the … (dot dot dot) of the Gen Xers. No Gen Zer uses those.

Obviously a Trump mistake. His operatives aren’t very smart, are they?

Dcum will expose this cover up.

These fake texts will not stand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dark shirted bodyguard is like those Highlights magazines that make you identify the differences between two pictures. He’s wearing different shirts, one he has tatoos on his arms, one he doesn’t have tattoos…

The put a more muscular tattooed body over the original thinner guy. Or vice versa.

Obviously a Trump plant who was involved in the shooting.

Kirk was on Trump’s hit list.

Don’t let Trump get away with this killing!

I don’t know who shot Charlie but that bodyguard is like a game of Spot the Difference.

[Anonymous]

I guess no one will honestly ID the real dark shirted bodyguard that day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The entire exchange is strange in that they didn’t talk yet continue to text, who wouldn’t call the other after admitting to a killing, come again?

I thought Gen z kids don't talk on the phone? And these are Internet addicts, they type.

Not by text. They’d be doing a direct chat on the game or Snapchat or something. They’re not texting. I mean unless he wants to share his confession and the motive, say where the gun is, exonerate the random dude, say his father is MAGA because he never told his trans lover who he takes long romantic walks either that he fights with his MAGA dad over his “lifestyle.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The entire exchange is strange in that they didn’t talk yet continue to text, who wouldn’t call the other after admitting to a killing, come again?

I thought Gen z kids don't talk on the phone? And these are Internet addicts, they type.

Not by text. They’d be doing a direct chat on the game or Snapchat or something. They’re not texting. I mean unless he wants to share his confession and the motive, say where the gun is, exonerate the random dude, say his father is MAGA because he never told his trans lover who he takes long romantic walks either that he fights with his MAGA dad over his “lifestyle.”

Those texts might have been done by Robinson for the lulz, just like the memes on the casings. It’s like we’re all being trolled and don’t seem to realize it yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The entire exchange is strange in that they didn’t talk yet continue to text, who wouldn’t call the other after admitting to a killing, come again?

He lived with Lance, presumably saw Lance after he was framed for Kirk’s murder. Tyler had absolutely no reason to text anyone and any person, especially under the age of probably 70 knows that texts cannot be permanently deleted.

Texts can be permanently deleted, at least for any practical purposes. If two people are communicating via an app that uses end-to-end encryption and both delete the messages from their phone, the messages are basically inaccessible to a third party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The entire exchange is strange in that they didn’t talk yet continue to text, who wouldn’t call the other after admitting to a killing, come again?

I thought Gen z kids don't talk on the phone? And these are Internet addicts, they type.

Not by text. They’d be doing a direct chat on the game or Snapchat or something. They’re not texting. I mean unless he wants to share his confession and the motive, say where the gun is, exonerate the random dude, say his father is MAGA because he never told his trans lover who he takes long romantic walks either that he fights with his MAGA dad over his “lifestyle.”

Those texts might have been done by Robinson for the lulz, just like the memes on the casings. It’s like we’re all being trolled and don’t seem to realize it yet.

Yeah we’re being trolled for sure but not by Tyler.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The entire exchange is strange in that they didn’t talk yet continue to text, who wouldn’t call the other after admitting to a killing, come again?

He was trying to escape capture and possible execution at any minute. Also, kids that age prefer texts to phone calls. Perhaps he did not know if the roommate was in a place where he/she could talk.

[Anonymous]

https://x.com/IsraeliPM/status/1968511432032391272

Netanyahu made another video denying any connection to the death of Charlie Kirk. He's always been very honest with the American public so I trust him here as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who pronounced Charlie dead?

And why have no photos of his body been released?

He’s dead, right? That’s what they claim. So there’s no HIPPA laws that apply. If he’s dead, we should have photos of the autopsy or evidence.

Things that make you go hmmmmmm.

Wtf? Why on earth would they need an autopsy? The world saw how he got killed. He was already in an open casket getting kissed by his wife the day after the shooting. Why would he need to be in the morgue on ice for two weeks?

Because they can do a ballistics investigation. Doesn’t the FBI want to know where the bullet came from to use in a murder investigation and trial?

Yeah, I think it's pretty standard to do ballistics and forensics analysis in a case like this. Are they just assuming the shooter shot from that roof because they have him on video? What if they did an analysis of the entrance and exit wounds and determined the bullet was shot from somewhere else. And did they find the bullet? You would think that would be reported -- i.e., the bullet exited Charlie and was found embedded in grass nearby, or whatever.

All of that takes a while in any criminal case. The government has revealed more of its evidence than is typical at this stage, and the prosecution has no obligation to reveal any information publicly. They have to turn over evidence to the defense if it is exculpatory, but otherwise there is not a normal discovery process. So, there is a whole lot we don't know about what evidence they have, and that is not going to change until they go to trial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So he bled out all over the SUV?

They likely had a BleedStop or other gunshot wound control patch kit.

No, all they had was a dirty sock tourniquet and hope.

Did you make that up? What would you apply a tourniquet to when the victim’s carotid artery has been destroyed?

In such a situation, you grab the first thing available and apply it as a tourniquet hoping it will hopefully stop or at least delay the bleeding long enough to get the victim to the hospital or ambulance for a blood transfusion and more effective means to stop the bleeding.

I doubt there was someone nearby who looked at Charlie’s wound and declared, “Artery destroyed, no hope. Don’t try to save him. ”

Shouldn't there be a medical expert at every large event just in case we need this kind of ruling?

With thousands of people there? Yes absolutely. Even high school football games are required to have an ambulance in attendance.

People with certain injuries will bleed out, even in a hospital.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The entire exchange is strange in that they didn’t talk yet continue to text, who wouldn’t call the other after admitting to a killing, come again?

He was trying to escape capture and possible execution at any minute. Also, kids that age prefer texts to phone calls. Perhaps he did not know if the roommate was in a place where he/she could talk.

If a person just committed murder there wouldn’t be any texts.

[Anonymous]

If that kid is guilty, Patel blew it with those obviously fake texts. Absolute clown act.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The entire exchange is strange in that they didn’t talk yet continue to text, who wouldn’t call the other after admitting to a killing, come again?

He was trying to escape capture and possible execution at any minute. Also, kids that age prefer texts to phone calls. Perhaps he did not know if the roommate was in a place where he/she could talk.

DP. Which makes the use of long complete sentences all the more suspicious. I don’t really get a sense of urgency or adrenaline in his texts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s going to come out that his wife is ethnically Jewish, isn’t it?

It looks like it’s going to be a fundraiser.

And how many of my tax dollars will be spent on them all going to their friend’s funeral?