Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Trump is vile. Threatening this woman. How much will the Republicans take? Unbelievable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey, GOP, you wanted riveting testimony? You've got it. Enjoy!

Chris Wallace says if viewers were not moved during Yovanovitch’s testimony, “you don’t have a pulse.”

Then I don't have a pulse.

Then again, I'm not into staged sappy behavior (and I'm female, before you try to blame this statement on a man)

OK. That explains a lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The markets clearly don't believe that anything will come out of this impeachment charade. It is making new highs in every major index.

The market's up because Kudlow was making the rounds puffing trade optimism. It has nothing to do with impeachment.

The markets don't like uncertainty and if it believed that this impeachment had legs - meaning that Trump could be removed - it would react.

The markets and anyone with a brain knows Trump will be impeached. The uncertainty is in removal. Even if he is removed, Trump becomes president. GOP policies won't change. So, no.

No uncertainty ...... he will not be removed. And the markets know this .....

No uncertainty.......He will be removed, impeachment or otherwise through a legal and constitutional process that he is appointed leader of and is subject to, or the people will riot. The global market has seen this type of outbreak in othwr countries, and is conservative in all lives for this reason. Human behavior can be measured, but our greatest strides in humanity come from in adjusting to oppression of purpose and goodwill. The market is watching, just like everyone else. And no one can change the still voice in everyone’s mind: this is wrong, and it is bad.

We are all watching.

Rioting? Really? If he is not removed by the Senate, people will riot??

You never know. Rodney King happened. I don’t want history to repeat itself. <3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why wasn’t Stefanik allowed to ask questions? Wow so rude. This from the party that claims to support women. Not a good look.

They figured having a woman speak a mile a minute in an angry manner would score points. Not sure I would agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey, GOP, you wanted riveting testimony? You've got it. Enjoy!

Chris Wallace says if viewers were not moved during Yovanovitch’s testimony, “you don’t have a pulse.”

Then I don't have a pulse.

Then again, I'm not into staged sappy behavior (and I'm female, before you try to blame this statement on a man)

OK. That explains a lot.

+1

Just another way in which Trump supporters are like brain dead zombies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The markets clearly don't believe that anything will come out of this impeachment charade. It is making new highs in every major index.

The market's up because Kudlow was making the rounds puffing trade optimism. It has nothing to do with impeachment.

The markets don't like uncertainty and if it believed that this impeachment had legs - meaning that Trump could be removed - it would react.

The markets and anyone with a brain knows Trump will be impeached. The uncertainty is in removal. Even if he is removed, Trump becomes president. GOP policies won't change. So, no.

No uncertainty ...... he will not be removed. And the markets know this .....

No uncertainty.......He will be removed, impeachment or otherwise through a legal and constitutional process that he is appointed leader of and is subject to, or the people will riot. The global market has seen this type of outbreak in othwr countries, and is conservative in all lives for this reason. Human behavior can be measured, but our greatest strides in humanity come from in adjusting to oppression of purpose and goodwill. The market is watching, just like everyone else. And no one can change the still voice in everyone’s mind: this is wrong, and it is bad.

We are all watching.

Rioting? Really? If he is not removed by the Senate, people will riot??

You never know. Rodney King happened. I don’t want history to repeat itself. <3

There is a line. We are there. Our democracy works because of the constitution. When the constitution is worthless we have lost our democracy. Pay attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wasn’t Stefanik allowed to ask questions? Wow so rude. This from the party that claims to support women. Not a good look.

They figured having a woman speak a mile a minute in an angry manner would score points. Not sure I would agree.

She was a fast talker.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wasn’t Stefanik allowed to ask questions? Wow so rude. This from the party that claims to support women. Not a good look.

They figured having a woman speak a mile a minute in an angry manner would score points. Not sure I would agree.

She was a fast talker.

If Haley doesn’t make it she will be our first female prez. You heard it here first!

[Anonymous]

You don’t understand how much empowering this vile non-servant peaceful presidential commander’s actions impact you?

We can help to explain it to you. It’s u understandable (ps: autocorrect suggested correcting “understandable” to “detests fable”

Cute.

The media has had to operate under the strategy of stakeholders that release provision for its existence.

#treasonoustrump
#blueWAVE
#blueWAVE2020
#itsgonnahappen

[Anonymous]

The Amb was so fantastic there - she said the president has the right to to place ambassadors, and all he had to do was remove and replace her. He did not have to malign her and set up a conspiracy campaign against her. He could have just removed her. This is so important.

[Anonymous]

I really resent the way the Republican Congress members lavishly praise the ambassador’s service, then proceed to trivialize her dismissal. Very insulting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wasn’t Stefanik allowed to ask questions? Wow so rude. This from the party that claims to support women. Not a good look.

They figured having a woman speak a mile a minute in an angry manner would score points. Not sure I would agree.

She was a fast talker.

If Haley doesn’t make it she will be our first female prez. You heard it here first!

I don't see it. Fast talker but not saying much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I really resent the way the Republican Congress members lavishly praise the ambassador’s service, then proceed to trivialize her dismissal. Very insulting.

They are trying to make the point that her removal is ultimately a non-issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Amb was so fantastic there - she said the president has the right to to place ambassadors, and all he had to do was remove and replace her. He did not have to malign her and set up a conspiracy campaign against her. He could have just removed her. This is so important.

Yes. And she just talked about how politics stops at the water's edge. She is brilliant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump released his "transcript" from the 1st call. The 1st call does not bring up "corruption" like the read-out said at that time. What's up with that.

In addition the 1st call "transcript" does not have his complain about Yovanovitch. But the Ukraine president mentioned that Trump's complain about her... what's up with that?

Cue people on the call to come forward and point out the lies/omissions in the readout/transcript.

John Oliver is right on when he calls this "stupid Watergate."