SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want someone to document the fresh dose of daily chaos from this administration. Keep it simple, like a brief journal entry. For example,
March 24 - revealed that too US officials discussed war plans through Signal, with emojis, and a journalist was in the chat.

I swear you could come up with something new every day. Then publish it and pass it out lime candy before next election.

+1. I thought the same thing today. Not to mention create a documentary.

The journal to make and publish is the one of all the things the Democrat congressmen and media are doing to keep talking about this Signal thing. When we all know Signal is the most secure communication system in the world because of course it is. The Democrats and media are giving aid and comfort to our enemies by talking about this, and soldiers and pilots will die.

Signal is not a secure communications network. What on earth gave you that idea? You know, the US has a whole security apparatus with its own lines of communication and secure areas with which to have said conversations and correspondences. Signal is not among them.

[Anonymous]

So was this whole fiasco planned as a way to given Elmo room to take over secure communications?

Are we just going to hand everything over to Elmo? Will we be changing our name to the United States of Musk?

[Anonymous]

The Republicans who voted for this f****** circus need to wake the hell up and start attending Town halls and demanding their Congress. People do something about this s*** show before more American lives get killed

[Anonymous]

The text thread is a window into the administration’s approach to policy issues, but it mostly makes clear that these are stupid, reckless people pursuing stupid, reckless policies.

[Anonymous]

According to the guidelines, the contents of the chat are absolutely classified. So that means everyone who testified about it, lied.

So now what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just want someone to document the fresh dose of daily chaos from this administration. Keep it simple, like a brief journal entry. For example,
March 24 - revealed that too US officials discussed war plans through Signal, with emojis, and a journalist was in the chat.

I swear you could come up with something new every day. Then publish it and pass it out lime candy before next election.

Amy Siskind is doing this - since the first term.
https://theweeklylist.org/

[Anonymous]

Are members of congress currently testifying under oath? I have only watched clips of testimony. If not they should be and should know they will be prosecuted if lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want someone to document the fresh dose of daily chaos from this administration. Keep it simple, like a brief journal entry. For example,
March 24 - revealed that too US officials discussed war plans through Signal, with emojis, and a journalist was in the chat.

I swear you could come up with something new every day. Then publish it and pass it out lime candy before next election.

+1. I thought the same thing today. Not to mention create a documentary.

The journal to make and publish is the one of all the things the Democrat congressmen and media are doing to keep talking about this Signal thing. When we all know Signal is the most secure communication system in the world because of course it is. The Democrats and media are giving aid and comfort to our enemies by talking about this, and soldiers and pilots will die.

Then you should ask why these folks didn’t take the extreme precautions upfront to protect our military personnel and country. And implore that their cavalier attitudes give way to their firing.

And at this point the majority of the world is our enemy as no one trust us or our word.

[Anonymous]

I read the texts. Is anyone talking about what is shows regarding the reasons we did attacked?

It was not because US economic interests were at stake. It was just to drop some bombs to look tough. It is ridiculous.


And they are wrong about European navy capabilities. Totally wrong.

They look like little boys playing with toys. And stupid and obsessed with attacking our ALLIES for no reason. Wow. You can totally see how Trump is Trump. He literally has no one giving him info on downsides. Just the opposite. They all are vying for one upping the rhetoric.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Republicans who voted for this f****** circus need to wake the hell up and start attending Town halls and demanding their Congress. People do something about this s*** show before more American lives get killed

I’m afraid that a lot of the republicans who voted for this don’t understand what the big deal is. Most people who voted for him have no idea how government works and they obviously don’t think it requires any maturity or professionalism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a little sample in Twitter form. What a bunch of dumbasses!

Naming the group chat “Houthi pc small group” implies there was also a larger group chat

+1 My BFF is hair on fire about this situation since she’s spent decades at NSA. She said the naming convention of the chat indicates that this is their normal MO, since that’s how the NSC sets up all its meetings. They’re doing this all over the place but this is where they got caught.

[Anonymous]

Never admit you are wrong, never give in. Trump is stumbling to keep his motto on this one. Also, there is no rule of law, keep it moving —- next!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I read the texts. Is anyone talking about what is shows regarding the reasons we did attacked?

It was not because US economic interests were at stake. It was just to drop some bombs to look tough. It is ridiculous.


And they are wrong about European navy capabilities. Totally wrong.

They look like little boys playing with toys. And stupid and obsessed with attacking our ALLIES for no reason. Wow. You can totally see how Trump is Trump. He literally has no one giving him info on downsides. Just the opposite. They all are vying for one upping the rhetoric.

They are obsessed with Joe Biden and they talk so much about messaging and how it looks as the major priority here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So was this whole fiasco planned as a way to given Elmo room to take over secure communications?

Are we just going to hand everything over to Elmo? Will we be changing our name to the United States of Musk?

We already have secure communications, these fools just chose not to use them.

[Anonymous]

The Atlantic published all of the texts today. Can anyone send a gift article please?