SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The text thread is a window into the administration’s approach to policy issues, but it mostly makes clear that these are stupid, reckless people pursuing stupid, reckless policies.

“They were careless people, Tom and Daisy - they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So was this whole fiasco planned as a way to given Elmo room to take over secure communications?

Are we just going to hand everything over to Elmo? Will we be changing our name to the United States of Musk?

We already have secure communications, these fools just chose not to use them.

+1 They actively AVOID using them because then they can avoid records management laws and oversight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The text thread is a window into the administration’s approach to policy issues, but it mostly makes clear that these are stupid, reckless people pursuing stupid, reckless policies.

“The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are members of congress currently testifying under oath? I have only watched clips of testimony. If not they should be and should know they will be prosecuted if lying.

The intelligence officials who testified did so under oath, yes. Who’s going to prosecute them for perjury? Pam Bondi? Eagle Ed Martin?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Republicans who voted for this f****** circus need to wake the hell up and start attending Town halls and demanding their Congress. People do something about this s*** show before more American lives get killed

I’m afraid that a lot of the republicans who voted for this don’t understand what the big deal is. Most people who voted for him have no idea how government works and they obviously don’t think it requires any maturity or professionalism.

Of course they don’t. They wait for Fox News to tell them when something is a big deal that they should get worked up over. You know, things like holding a coffee cup while saluting while exiting Air Force One or wearing a tan suit.

[Anonymous]

Can we still use the word “intelligence” when discussing these people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read the texts. Is anyone talking about what is shows regarding the reasons we did attacked?

It was not because US economic interests were at stake. It was just to drop some bombs to look tough. It is ridiculous.


And they are wrong about European navy capabilities. Totally wrong.

They look like little boys playing with toys. And stupid and obsessed with attacking our ALLIES for no reason. Wow. You can totally see how Trump is Trump. He literally has no one giving him info on downsides. Just the opposite. They all are vying for one upping the rhetoric.

They are obsessed with Joe Biden and they talk so much about messaging and how it looks as the major priority here.

YES there should not be that much partisan political nonsense while discussing these grave matters. Plus it makes Trump look clueless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Atlantic published all of the texts today. Can anyone send a gift article please?

This link from the NYT was open for me

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/

[Anonymous]

Here's a link to the attack plans that Trump admin folks said were not attack plans.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/?taid=67e3f167bcc414000187edec&utm_campaign=the-atlantic&utm_content=true-anthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So was this whole fiasco planned as a way to given Elmo room to take over secure communications?

Are we just going to hand everything over to Elmo? Will we be changing our name to the United States of Musk?

We have secure systems. They intentionally, perhaps criminally ??, chose not to use them. Nothing new is needed, except leadership.

[Anonymous]

GA Senator Jon Osseff should be on everyone’s radar. He’s got what it takes to run in 2028. Young gun slaughtered them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Atlantic published all of the texts today. Can anyone send a gift article please?

This link from the NYT was open for me

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/

thank you!

[Anonymous]

Who is MAR on these texts. Maralago? But who?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Atlantic published all of the texts today. Can anyone send a gift article please?

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/?gift=CqpNA0Lpd1zKrg7W1mX58LUEcqNWa5OAR_X45aKDcNM&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who is MAR on these texts. Maralago? But who?

Marco Rubio