SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat

[Anonymous]

This sort of thing didn't happen when the "DEI people" were in charge


https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/28/politics/us-navy-jet-overboard/index.html

Just saying...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But purposefully releasing these chats, the general public can be distracted by how these messages are being transmitted rather than the actual content which is being overlooked. We're going to war again to support Israel and bombing civilians in the process.

If you want to start a separate thread about why we’re attacking the Houthis go ahead. But it’s not relevant here because any Trump SecDef is going to want to do that. We can’t really do anything at the moment about the policy behind these attacks (which are also trying to maintain safe passage in the Suez Canal which is vital.) What we could possibly do is get these hideous mistakes to light and try to get someone competent in charge who isn’t breaching national security just for bragging rights and funsies.

We won’t need it as much when we tariff so much we lost trading partners.

[Anonymous]

And yet another Signal group chat

[Anonymous]

The UK defense minister announced UK airstrikes against the Houthis AFTER they happened.

Just saying.....

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Someone should shove that bow tie down his throat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Any Hill staffers here? Is it normal to sneak language in at the last minute?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Any Hill staffers here? Is it normal to sneak language in at the last minute?

Yes there is always language that is unrelated which is why folks have been shouting for a decade about the need for clean bills focused on only one specific issue. If the thing can’t stand in its own and hold up against debate and voting it shouldn’t be there.

These are the type of policies that voters should be hammering their Reps and Senators on.

Also, things like confessional pay freezes when there is a furlough. They shouldn’t be able to upend everyone else financial lives because they haven’t done their jobs and meanwhile still get paid. In fact, I’m in favor of them getting fined during this time period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And yet another Signal group chat

I really hate it when we disparage women’s looks, but I was shocked to learn that his wife is 40. When I saw the picture of them together, I thought, who has her arm around Hegseth like that? because I figured it could not be his wife.

It’s quite possible she is battling health issues or something and I wish her the best, but if it is just stress from being married to alcoholic Pete, wow.

[Anonymous]

Sun damage.

[Anonymous]

Michael Waltz takes the fall! My guess is that it is not for breaking all sorts of national security laws, but for being in contact with a lefty journalist.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/05/01/us/trump-news
Adviser out: President Trump is ousting his national security adviser, Michael Waltz, the first major personnel change of top aides in his second term. Mr. Waltz had been on thin ice since a group chat he organized on the commercial messaging app Signal to discuss a sensitive military operation became public.

[Anonymous]

Unfortunate. He's one of the only people in this admin I trust not to be evil.

[Anonymous]

So Waltz is out. How long before Hegseth follows because we all knows he’s struggling and causing everyone around him to struggle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Waltz is out. How long before Hegseth follows because we all knows he’s struggling and causing everyone around him to struggle.

We already know he doesn’t have full faith in Hegseth. He had to clean that up during the interview. What’s are guess at this point 60% confidence?

[Anonymous]

Anyone see the latest Singal leaks?

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTjBcUdRB/

I want to know who/what he and JD Vance were talking about here:

"I have confirmation from my counterpart it's turned off. He is going to be here in..." and that's all we can see of the message.