Virginia Roberts Giuffre describes being trafficked to Prince Andrew

[Anonymous]

Really unsettling. Where were her parents?

[Anonymous]

Not going away and with Epstein dead...Andrew is the highest remaining target.

[Anonymous]

It's disgusting. It's also vile how the royal family is silent. I don't understand why the British put up with them.

[Anonymous]

It's airing tonight - NBC says that the special, titled “Reckoning,” airing Friday, Sept. 20 at 10pm EST, includes interviews by Savannah Guthrie with several other young women who describe “the elaborate and highly organized operation that enabled Epstein to abuse young girls for many years.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/epstein-accuser-virginia-roberts-giuffre-sits-down-with-dateline-to-make-prince-andrew-allegations-on-camera

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's disgusting. It's also vile how the royal family is silent. I don't understand why the British put up with them.

They are vile. I have no idea how many Brit's still support those sick F@&s but I imagine the number is dwindling.

[Anonymous]

They used to call him Randy Andy.

[Anonymous]

If she was 17 years old and they were in London, then absolutely zero laws were broken if she did indeed sleep with any member of the royal family.

In the UK the age of consent for any gender, is 16.

So she has no case even if it were true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If she was 17 years old and they were in London, then absolutely zero laws were broken if she did indeed sleep with any member of the royal family.

In the UK the age of consent for any gender, is 16.

So she has no case even if it were true.

Wow, if that is true, and I have no reason to doubt you, then that is appalling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If she was 17 years old and they were in London, then absolutely zero laws were broken if she did indeed sleep with any member of the royal family.

In the UK the age of consent for any gender, is 16.

So she has no case even if it were true.

Funny - is prostitution legal in London?

Because she describes being paid $15,000 to be raped by Andrew in a townhouse bathroom.

Did he pay Epstein that absurd amount of money for access to what was between her legs?

Or worse - did he trade access to the Queen for his sick perversions?

Everyone knows Andrew hosted Epstein in Buckingham Palace after all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If she was 17 years old and they were in London, then absolutely zero laws were broken if she did indeed sleep with any member of the royal family.

In the UK the age of consent for any gender, is 16.

So she has no case even if it were true.

Prostitution and sex trafficking aren't legal in the UK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she was 17 years old and they were in London, then absolutely zero laws were broken if she did indeed sleep with any member of the royal family.

In the UK the age of consent for any gender, is 16.

So she has no case even if it were true.

Funny - is prostitution legal in London?

Because she describes being paid $15,000 to be raped by Andrew in a townhouse bathroom.

Did he pay Epstein that absurd amount of money for access to what was between her legs?

Or worse - did he trade access to the Queen for his sick perversions?

Everyone knows Andrew hosted Epstein in Buckingham Palace after all.

I think sadly without proof of payment, rape or anything else, there is nothing to go on. Everyone knows that, no matter how much noise she chooses to make about it now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she was 17 years old and they were in London, then absolutely zero laws were broken if she did indeed sleep with any member of the royal family.

In the UK the age of consent for any gender, is 16.

So she has no case even if it were true.

Funny - is prostitution legal in London?

Because she describes being paid $15,000 to be raped by Andrew in a townhouse bathroom.

Did he pay Epstein that absurd amount of money for access to what was between her legs?

Or worse - did he trade access to the Queen for his sick perversions?

Everyone knows Andrew hosted Epstein in Buckingham Palace after all.

I think sadly without proof of payment, rape or anything else, there is nothing to go on. Everyone knows that, no matter how much noise she chooses to make about it now.

Why do you think the FBI raided Epstein’s house after he died? For funsies?

They’re getting all the evidence they need, including financial transactions, and he’s not around to stop them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she was 17 years old and they were in London, then absolutely zero laws were broken if she did indeed sleep with any member of the royal family.

In the UK the age of consent for any gender, is 16.

So she has no case even if it were true.

Funny - is prostitution legal in London?

Because she describes being paid $15,000 to be raped by Andrew in a townhouse bathroom.

Did he pay Epstein that absurd amount of money for access to what was between her legs?

Or worse - did he trade access to the Queen for his sick perversions?

Everyone knows Andrew hosted Epstein in Buckingham Palace after all.

I think sadly without proof of payment, rape or anything else, there is nothing to go on. Everyone knows that, no matter how much noise she chooses to make about it now.

Why do you think the FBI raided Epstein’s house after he died? For funsies?

They’re getting all the evidence they need, including financial transactions, and he’s not around to stop them.

I'm 100% sure they will get a lot of evidence about a lot of things, but concrete evidence to support the claims above - eh, maybe not so much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she was 17 years old and they were in London, then absolutely zero laws were broken if she did indeed sleep with any member of the royal family.

In the UK the age of consent for any gender, is 16.

So she has no case even if it were true.

Funny - is prostitution legal in London?

Because she describes being paid $15,000 to be raped by Andrew in a townhouse bathroom.

Did he pay Epstein that absurd amount of money for access to what was between her legs?

Or worse - did he trade access to the Queen for his sick perversions?

Everyone knows Andrew hosted Epstein in Buckingham Palace after all.

I think sadly without proof of payment, rape or anything else, there is nothing to go on. Everyone knows that, no matter how much noise she chooses to make about it now.

Why do you think the FBI raided Epstein’s house after he died? For funsies?

They’re getting all the evidence they need, including financial transactions, and he’s not around to stop them.

I'm 100% sure they will get a lot of evidence about a lot of things, but concrete evidence to support the claims above - eh, maybe not so much.

I totally believe they will. Because Andrew's an idiot.

Who has sex with a teenager in another person's BATHROOM? Who goes on a long, extended stay with a convicted pedophile in the year after the scandal was first at its peak? Andrew, Andrew, Andrew.

I do believe that the palace has protected him his whole life and he thinks he's untouchable as such. Him and his grifter wife. Sorry, EX-wife whose is still staying in royal estates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she was 17 years old and they were in London, then absolutely zero laws were broken if she did indeed sleep with any member of the royal family.

In the UK the age of consent for any gender, is 16.

So she has no case even if it were true.

Funny - is prostitution legal in London?

Because she describes being paid $15,000 to be raped by Andrew in a townhouse bathroom.

Did he pay Epstein that absurd amount of money for access to what was between her legs?

Or worse - did he trade access to the Queen for his sick perversions?

Everyone knows Andrew hosted Epstein in Buckingham Palace after all.

I think sadly without proof of payment, rape or anything else, there is nothing to go on. Everyone knows that, no matter how much noise she chooses to make about it now.

Why do you think the FBI raided Epstein’s house after he died? For funsies?

They’re getting all the evidence they need, including financial transactions, and he’s not around to stop them.

I'm 100% sure they will get a lot of evidence about a lot of things, but concrete evidence to support the claims above - eh, maybe not so much.

I totally believe they will. Because Andrew's an idiot.

Who has sex with a teenager in another person's BATHROOM? Who goes on a long, extended stay with a convicted pedophile in the year after the scandal was first at its peak? Andrew, Andrew, Andrew.

I do believe that the palace has protected him his whole life and he thinks he's untouchable as such. Him and his grifter wife. Sorry, EX-wife whose is still staying in royal estates.

I fully agree that Prince Andrew is an idiot and a grifter and so is his ex-wife. But guilty of rape, no. You need to remember that he would have had to force himself on her for it to be rape. It doesn't sound forced. If she was 17 in London she could have had sex with anyone and it would have been legal (unless she asked for money - then she would have been committing a crime...)