Virginia Roberts Giuffre describes being trafficked to Prince Andrew

[Anonymous]

Prince Andrew's BBC interview is online. It's Diana's Panorama interview meets Clinton testifying. His ship is sunk.

[Anonymous]

WTF he lying about the most simple stuff.

"After I got married I was very happy and I never felt the need to go and party..."

[Anonymous]

The man is DEAD and he refuses to say that he regrets the friendship.

"The people that I met and the opportunities that I was given to learn either by him or because of him were actually very useful." - Prince Andrew on Jeffrey Epstein.

He sounds like he's talking about his freaking master in some sort of ancient Greek relationship. And the way he constantly references Epstein's girlfriend. Andrew WTF...

[Anonymous]

Andrew’s a fool. If he’s ever pulled into court he just assured that his daughter will be called to testify on his behalf about the night in question.

What daughter wants to swear before a magistrate and jury that her father wasn’t out sexing up a 17-year-old because he was actually with her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Andrew’s a fool. If he’s ever pulled into court he just assured that his daughter will be called to testify on his behalf about the night in question.

What daughter wants to swear before a magistrate and jury that her father wasn’t out sexing up a 17-year-old because he was actually with her?

What you fail to realize is that he WILL NOT be pulled into court. He has not committed a crime in the eyes of the law in the UK, even if he HAD slept with her.

Also the UK public knows and has known for years what a complete idiot this guy is. It doesn't make him a criminal and it doesn't mean he loses anything, he is STILL a Prince with a fortune.

Go figure.

[Anonymous]

The nobles and royals have always been indecent. Tradition throughout the ages
The title of prince should only be for the next in line to the throne
He will never be king. It is crazy for so many to have that title

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andrew’s a fool. If he’s ever pulled into court he just assured that his daughter will be called to testify on his behalf about the night in question.

What daughter wants to swear before a magistrate and jury that her father wasn’t out sexing up a 17-year-old because he was actually with her?

What you fail to realize is that he WILL NOT be pulled into court. He has not committed a crime in the eyes of the law in the UK, even if he HAD slept with her.

Also the UK public knows and has known for years what a complete idiot this guy is. It doesn't make him a criminal and it doesn't mean he loses anything, he is STILL a Prince with a fortune.

Go figure.

Are you the person who claims Andrew isn't guilty of raping a 17-year-old and the FBI investigation into pedo-island means nothing?

Funny, with the latest revelations with this BBC interview and before that the Amy Robach investigation - it seems to be turning into a whole lot of something for Andrew and his crazy ex-wife.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The nobles and royals have always been indecent. Tradition throughout the ages
The title of prince should only be for the next in line to the throne
He will never be king. It is crazy for so many to have that title

Maybe all the monarch's children should immediately be demoted upon marriage and/or the death of their forebearer (i.e. if Andrew never married and mummy died - he's only acknowledged as Duke of York). With the exception of the PoW and the PoW's heir (but not extras like Harry/Charlotte/Louis/Archie).

It's how the Japanese imperial family treats all their women, which is why their family is so small.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andrew’s a fool. If he’s ever pulled into court he just assured that his daughter will be called to testify on his behalf about the night in question.

What daughter wants to swear before a magistrate and jury that her father wasn’t out sexing up a 17-year-old because he was actually with her?

What you fail to realize is that he WILL NOT be pulled into court. He has not committed a crime in the eyes of the law in the UK, even if he HAD slept with her.

Also the UK public knows and has known for years what a complete idiot this guy is. It doesn't make him a criminal and it doesn't mean he loses anything, he is STILL a Prince with a fortune.

Go figure.

Are you the person who claims Andrew isn't guilty of raping a 17-year-old and the FBI investigation into pedo-island means nothing?

Funny, with the latest revelations with this BBC interview and before that the Amy Robach investigation - it seems to be turning into a whole lot of something for Andrew and his crazy ex-wife.

Excuse me?

[Anonymous]

Having read the Vanity Fair article yesterday I would say its a fair guess that Epstein and his gathering of secrets on others included falsifying secrets in order to wield influence and / or raise funds.

It wouldn't surprise me if this girl was in on that - and where sometimes she did sleep with powerful men, sometimes she also did not, but was posed with them in photographs and nightclubs and so forth.

She is not the brightest of individuals and while that is not her fault, it also seems like she is stepping back into that scenario - and for whatever reason possibly trying to squeeze people in the way Epstein taught her how.

I don't know - its just a theory. Of all the girls, some of whom were clearly genuine victims of Epstein and whose lives have been severely affected by that, this one seems just so much more complicit in every way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Having read the Vanity Fair article yesterday I would say its a fair guess that Epstein and his gathering of secrets on others included falsifying secrets in order to wield influence and / or raise funds.

It wouldn't surprise me if this girl was in on that - and where sometimes she did sleep with powerful men, sometimes she also did not, but was posed with them in photographs and nightclubs and so forth.

She is not the brightest of individuals and while that is not her fault, it also seems like she is stepping back into that scenario - and for whatever reason possibly trying to squeeze people in the way Epstein taught her how.

I don't know - its just a theory. Of all the girls, some of whom were clearly genuine victims of Epstein and whose lives have been severely affected by that, this one seems just so much more complicit in every way.

She was 17 and lost in a world she had no knowledge of. But sure blame the victim.

Why not save the vitriol for Ghislaine Maxwell? Epstein's madam and the woman who groomed all these girls.

[Anonymous]

Well, well. Now the U.S. Government's getting involved.

Congress just announced its intentions to investigate ABC News over their refusal to air the Amy Robach piece on Epstein and Prince Andrew. If she's called to testify before the subcommittee O.O

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andrew’s a fool. If he’s ever pulled into court he just assured that his daughter will be called to testify on his behalf about the night in question.

What daughter wants to swear before a magistrate and jury that her father wasn’t out sexing up a 17-year-old because he was actually with her?

What you fail to realize is that he WILL NOT be pulled into court. He has not committed a crime in the eyes of the law in the UK, even if he HAD slept with her.

Also the UK public knows and has known for years what a complete idiot this guy is. It doesn't make him a criminal and it doesn't mean he loses anything, he is STILL a Prince with a fortune.

Go figure.

Lying to law enforcement and obstruction are crimes too, if they happened.

[Anonymous]

Strange photos from that boat. She is clearly out of place, looking so young and floating around with a vague smile (was she drunk or drugged?) in a tank top, while the others are dressed much more, well, adult.

Everyone in those photos should be questioned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
I don't know - its just a theory. Of all the girls, some of whom were clearly genuine victims of Epstein and whose lives have been severely affected by that, this one seems just so much more complicit in every way.

"Let's see, what scenario can I spin that would let Epstein & Andrew off the hook and instead blame a 17YO survivor of sexual abuse?"