Virginia Roberts Giuffre describes being trafficked to Prince Andrew

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Andrew not only has to pay his staffers' salaries out of his own pocket now (or the Queen's private funds), but also is going to be charged monthly rent for his Buckingham Palace offices which is easily another 10,000 pounds (per commercial lease space in that prime area).

He really drove himself right over a cliff.

The source revealed that the Queen is expected to order Andrew and his staff to leave their offices at Buckingham Palace – or fork out huge sums to rent them privately.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7712753/Sidelined-Prince-Andrews-aide-car-crash-Newsnight-interview-shunted.html

There is soooo much tea leaking out of the palace with this Andrew drama.

Andrew occupies a small suite of rooms in the palace, including two small offices, a meeting room and a bedroom he uses when staying overnight. Two sources said yesterday the teams working on Pitch and iDEA would be moving out...

[Anonymous]

Buckingham Palace has over the 300 rooms and the Queen's son only merits a single bedroom?

Yeah, being royal has definitely slid down over the years. Princes and Princesses used to have whole suites of rooms in addition to their 'country' homes.

[Anonymous]

I am very skeptical of all these articles proclaiming Andrew’s impending financial doom. I think the palace is just putting them out to calm public opinion. Elizabeth’s not going to let her favorite son go without.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am very skeptical of all these articles proclaiming Andrew’s impending financial doom. I think the palace is just putting them out to calm public opinion. Elizabeth’s not going to let her favorite son go without.

Yes, his "suicide" will be deeply felt.

[Anonymous]

Interesting that Prince Phillip isn't standing by his 'son'.

He was at Windsor Castle this weekend. Zerooooooo pictures of him with Andrew even though Queen rode out in the rain with him.

[Anonymous]

Andrew just lost all 230 Patronages.

What I want to know is if he will no longer be the Colonel of the Grenadier Guards. He inherited the position from Prince Phillip in 2017.

It's a pretty important position, only for a senior Royal (usually the heir, a consort, or the spare) and a key role in the Trooping of the Colour celebration every summer.



https://www.royal.uk/duke-york-appointed-colonel-grenadier-guards

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Andrew just lost all 230 Patronages.

What I want to know is if he will no longer be the Colonel of the Grenadier Guards. He inherited the position from Prince Phillip in 2017.

It's a pretty important position, only for a senior Royal (usually the heir, a consort, or the spare) and a key role in the Trooping of the Colour celebration every summer.



https://www.royal.uk/duke-york-appointed-colonel-grenadier-guards

Andrew just needs to let it go.

A royal source insisted to The Times that Andrew is “keeping his military commands.”

https://nypost.com/2019/11/28/uk-force-leaders-want-prince-andrew-stripped-of-military-titles/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

https://www.royal.uk/duke-york-appointed-colonel-grenadier-guards

I hope Anne get promoted, she works so hard and looks adorable in her military outfit!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

https://www.royal.uk/duke-york-appointed-colonel-grenadier-guards

I hope Anne get promoted, she works so hard and looks adorable in her military outfit!

Ehh, she can't. Each of the royals on horseback represents the highest rank of a military regiment/household.

Left to Right -

Prince Charles - Colonel of the Welsh Guards
Prince William - Colonel of the Irish Guards
Prince Andrew - Colonel of the Grenadier Guards
Princess Anne - Colonel of the Blues and Royals

To put it simply, one royal can't be a colonel of more than one of those branches -- except the Queen. So if Andrew steps down the next senior most royal would step forward - Prince Harry or Prince Edward (no military background)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

https://www.royal.uk/duke-york-appointed-colonel-grenadier-guards

I hope Anne get promoted, she works so hard and looks adorable in her military outfit!

Ehh, she can't. Each of the royals on horseback represents the highest rank of a military regiment/household.

Left to Right -

Prince Charles - Colonel of the Welsh Guards
Prince William - Colonel of the Irish Guards
Prince Andrew - Colonel of the Grenadier Guards
Princess Anne - Colonel of the Blues and Royals

To put it simply, one royal can't be a colonel of more than one of those branches -- except the Queen. So if Andrew steps down the next senior most royal would step forward - Prince Harry or Prince Edward (no military background)

Prince Harry fought in Afghanistan

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she was 17 years old and they were in London, then absolutely zero laws were broken if she did indeed sleep with any member of the royal family.

In the UK the age of consent for any gender, is 16.

So she has no case even if it were true.

Prostitution and sex trafficking aren't legal in the UK.

Prostitution is legal in the UK but the prostitute minimum age is 18.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

https://www.royal.uk/duke-york-appointed-colonel-grenadier-guards

I hope Anne get promoted, she works so hard and looks adorable in her military outfit!

Ehh, she can't. Each of the royals on horseback represents the highest rank of a military regiment/household.

Left to Right -

Prince Charles - Colonel of the Welsh Guards
Prince William - Colonel of the Irish Guards
Prince Andrew - Colonel of the Grenadier Guards
Princess Anne - Colonel of the Blues and Royals

To put it simply, one royal can't be a colonel of more than one of those branches -- except the Queen. So if Andrew steps down the next senior most royal would step forward - Prince Harry or Prince Edward (no military background)

Prince Harry fought in Afghanistan

Yes, which is why he would be an excellent Colonel of the Grenadier Guards.

[Anonymous]

That Amy Robach leak & ABC News cover-up was the worst thing to happen to the BRF. Fox News is all over their butts now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she was 17 years old and they were in London, then absolutely zero laws were broken if she did indeed sleep with any member of the royal family.

In the UK the age of consent for any gender, is 16.

So she has no case even if it were true.

Prostitution and sex trafficking aren't legal in the UK.

Prostitution is legal in the UK but the prostitute minimum age is 18.

The woman accusing Andrew was not chained and could have run away at any time but she did not! Also, she has waited all these years to make her accusation. I do not believe her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she was 17 years old and they were in London, then absolutely zero laws were broken if she did indeed sleep with any member of the royal family.

In the UK the age of consent for any gender, is 16.

So she has no case even if it were true.

Prostitution and sex trafficking aren't legal in the UK.

Prostitution is legal in the UK but the prostitute minimum age is 18.

The woman accusing Andrew was not chained and could have run away at any time but she did not! Also, she has waited all these years to make her accusation. I do not believe her.

She first made those accusations more than 15 years ago...which is why Epstein first went to jail in 2011.

Try again.