Superbowl halftime - scantily dressed women and very covered up men

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's sum up this thread. Frumpy women hate hot women.

#not all frumpy women!

+1000

Frumpy woman in awe of those bodies!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The shaming of women for speaking up and saying this kind of objectifying of women is not ok.

Just because I want to be seen as more than a sexual object does not make me a prude or an ugly old hag. Jesus ladies!

But, others don't see it the same way you do. You are working yourself up trying to convince people of something they will never believe. There is something amiss with you. Remember: the definition of crazy is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result. You are being defeated. This can only end badly for you and your delicate sensibilities.

Newsflash - your opinion is not necessarily the “right” one. I know that’s hard to understand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, so let me get this straight. Here are some images captured from J.Lo's performance. I could capture more, but you get the idea. These types of dance moves are appropriate for children? Because Super Bowl has always been a family event. I guess not anymore. And don't tell me this is typical Latino dance stuff...sorry, I am Latino and I don't buy that.

Seriously she looks like she’s having an orgasm in that second picture.

Latina here why are you NOT criticizing the camera man’s angel on JLO. More than likely that camera man is WHITE and was zooming in on JLO’s crotch. I’m sure if the camera man zoomed out a little or moved the camera angle up a little it would of looked different. The same goes with Shakira when the camera man was zooming up towards her crotch area.

For that pic, JLo slid directly at the camera on the floor. She slid her crotch into the lens front and center. Did you actually watch? Because that’s what happened. The camera man didn’t have to go looking for that shot. She presented it directly to him.

They had 3 independent companies censoring the show so clearly the normal human thought it was okay for family TV. I watched, it was fine. It is not different than close up shots of gymnasts.

Gymnasts don’t grab their crotches. Why is this so hard to understand? Quit being willfully ignorant. It is not even remotely the same. Find me a gymnast who grabs her crotch and slides it into the camera front and center, then we’ll talk.

It's exactly the same but your racist subconscious can't see it that way. I think your racism is so ingrained that you can't see that you judge these women with a different measuring stick than other women... gymnasts, dancing with the stars, so you think you can dance, america's got talent... alll of them the same... but they are mostly white women so... it's okay in your mind.

I'm not the PP and was fine with the performance, but I totally disagree with you about sports and entertainment being the same.

Also, have you ever watched gymnastics? There are plenty of WOC participating, including the best gymnast the world has ever known, who is universally beloved.

[Anonymous]

Meh. Tired of women having to use sex to sell themselves. Felt the same way about Madonna and others, so not a racist thing. All would have been fine without JLo simulating sex acts onstage. Just gross.

The PR flag and references to migrant children, though, that's the kind of stuff you need in there to get people thinking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meh. Tired of women having to use sex to sell themselves. Felt the same way about Madonna and others, so not a racist thing. All would have been fine without JLo simulating sex acts onstage. Just gross.

The PR flag and references to migrant children, though, that's the kind of stuff you need in there to get people thinking.

Ditto. I'm a Latina. I generally thought it was pretty good. They're great performers. But, seriously, I don't need to see JLo's crotch. If that's empowerment, I just don't know. Young Latinas need to see that we have more to us than explicit sexiness. Maybe mild to moderate sexiness, fine. Like Shakira.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny that most of the bettys and karens most likely had zero problem during the women’s marches wearing those pink pussyhats while seeing all those topless women walking around. I saw those same Karen’s taking their 5 year olds to that.

But jlo and shakira??? In a planned sbhalftime show??? OMGGGGGG

Because Bettys and Karen’s can’t dance like that.

But are totally fine yelling obscenities and curse words talking about f this and f that and cursing around little kids.

I know because I was at the women’s march 3 years ago. It was vile. I can imagine that same crowd of overweight middle age women are the ones who would be upset at minority famous women dancing on stage for 10 minutes.

Also, scantially clad? Both women had on outfits from head to toe.

The liberal women's march women are not the ones who are upset at this, based on what I have seen. The people who are upset at this are the conservative, family-values people.

Not true. I vote conservatively but I also believe in a woman’s privilege and right to be who she wants to be. As a prosecutor, of course I subscribe to the idea that women should be able to wear what they want and not be called sluts, trash, or said they were “asking for it.” I loved the performance. I’m not sure this particular issue is something that lines up politically.

I think it’s more the liberal ones who seem mad. Cause ya know, they keep saying how not racist they are but in reality....Makes you wonder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meh. Tired of women having to use sex to sell themselves. Felt the same way about Madonna and others, so not a racist thing. All would have been fine without JLo simulating sex acts onstage. Just gross.

The PR flag and references to migrant children, though, that's the kind of stuff you need in there to get people thinking.

Ditto. I'm a Latina. I generally thought it was pretty good. They're great performers. But, seriously, I don't need to see JLo's crotch. If that's empowerment, I just don't know. Young Latinas need to see that we have more to us than explicit sexiness. Maybe mild to moderate sexiness, fine. Like Shakira.

Who needs the patriarchy when the matriarchy will keep women down for them? We are our own worst enemies ladies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny that most of the bettys and karens most likely had zero problem during the women’s marches wearing those pink pussyhats while seeing all those topless women walking around. I saw those same Karen’s taking their 5 year olds to that.

But jlo and shakira??? In a planned sbhalftime show??? OMGGGGGG

Because Bettys and Karen’s can’t dance like that.

But are totally fine yelling obscenities and curse words talking about f this and f that and cursing around little kids.

I know because I was at the women’s march 3 years ago. It was vile. I can imagine that same crowd of overweight middle age women are the ones who would be upset at minority famous women dancing on stage for 10 minutes.

Also, scantially clad? Both women had on outfits from head to toe.

The liberal women's march women are not the ones who are upset at this, based on what I have seen. The people who are upset at this are the conservative, family-values people.

Not true. I vote conservatively but I also believe in a woman’s privilege and right to be who she wants to be. As a prosecutor, of course I subscribe to the idea that women should be able to wear what they want and not be called sluts, trash, or said they were “asking for it.” I loved the performance. I’m not sure this particular issue is something that lines up politically.

I think it’s more the liberal ones who seem mad. Cause ya know, they keep saying how not racist they are but in reality....Makes you wonder.

I don't think the anger has anything to do with race.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The shaming of women for speaking up and saying this kind of objectifying of women is not ok.

Just because I want to be seen as more than a sexual object does not make me a prude or an ugly old hag. Jesus ladies!

But, others don't see it the same way you do. You are working yourself up trying to convince people of something they will never believe. There is something amiss with you. Remember: the definition of crazy is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result. You are being defeated. This can only end badly for you and your delicate sensibilities.

Newsflash - your opinion is not necessarily the “right” one. I know that’s hard to understand.

I know that and I respect your opinion. I disagree with you and no amount of bullying will make me see this the way you see it. Why don't you respect my opinion?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meh. Tired of women having to use sex to sell themselves. Felt the same way about Madonna and others, so not a racist thing. All would have been fine without JLo simulating sex acts onstage. Just gross.

The PR flag and references to migrant children, though, that's the kind of stuff you need in there to get people thinking.

Ditto. I'm a Latina. I generally thought it was pretty good. They're great performers. But, seriously, I don't need to see JLo's crotch. If that's empowerment, I just don't know. Young Latinas need to see that we have more to us than explicit sexiness. Maybe mild to moderate sexiness, fine. Like Shakira.

Who needs the patriarchy when the matriarchy will keep women down for them? We are our own worst enemies ladies.

+1000