What happens to Kamala’s momentum now the DNC is over?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Especially for those of you who live in red areas, this is a very good idea.

Excellent!

You want people to associate toilets with Harris/Walz?

No, you're trying to change minds. It's where to find Trump voters who can be swayed.

DP. If I found one of these ridiculous sticky notes in a bathroom stall, I would simply flush it away. You people cannot be serious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Especially for those of you who live in red areas, this is a very good idea.

Excellent!

You want people to associate toilets with Harris/Walz?

No, you're trying to change minds. It's where to find Trump voters who can be swayed.

DP. If I found one of these ridiculous sticky notes in a bathroom stall, I would simply flush it away. You people cannot be serious.

You change one mind that's an extra vote. These aren't targeting you, so decompress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Especially for those of you who live in red areas, this is a very good idea.

Excellent!

You want people to associate toilets with Harris/Walz?

No, you're trying to change minds. It's where to find Trump voters who can be swayed.

DP. If I found one of these ridiculous sticky notes in a bathroom stall, I would simply flush it away. You people cannot be serious.

You do you. Think how lucky you are that you are not a victim of domestic violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Especially for those of you who live in red areas, this is a very good idea.

Isn’t this littering? Leaving these everywhere? I’m generally perplexed as a women married to someone way more conservative politically than me, do you honestly think my husband has that much influence over me and that paper has more? I don’t share many views as my husband and that’s okay. We’ve managed to be together almost 30 years at this point.

+1
Democrats are so utterly stupid that they actually think undecided voters (or conservative women?) have to be “reached” in a bathroom stall. Presumably, so that their husbands won’t find out?? This is the level of “intellect” the left is putting forth. Just astounding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10:35 again and I find this new campaign strategy very demeaning to women - that there are all these woman who want to vote for her but need encouragement because they life with R husbands? WTH. This is not a winning strategy and does not make me like her.

This country is full of churches telling women to submit to their husbands.
I think it’s just great you haven’t been affected by that, but it’s a very real problem.

DP. Really? Please do cite those churches - from a reputable and non-biased source. A “very real problem,” my a$$.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10:35 again and I find this new campaign strategy very demeaning to women - that there are all these woman who want to vote for her but need encouragement because they life with R husbands? WTH. This is not a winning strategy and does not make me like her.

It's not campaign strategy. It's some Harris supporter coming up with an idea to communicate with women that their votes are private, and their spouses don't really know how they're voting.

There was a divorce lawyer who gives free advice to women posting on Twitter that she was receiving a large volume of the same non-divorce related question - 'Can my husband find out how I am voting?'. So there are apparently a lot of women that do have that question. And have relationships where they are not at liberty to say that they're voting differently from their spouses.

Ah - a random divorce lawyer on Twitter made this claim, so it MUST be true! Amazing the nonsense you believe because it fits your narrative.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10:35 again and I find this new campaign strategy very demeaning to women - that there are all these woman who want to vote for her but need encouragement because they life with R husbands? WTH. This is not a winning strategy and does not make me like her.

This country is full of churches telling women to submit to their husbands.
I think it’s just great you haven’t been affected by that, but it’s a very real problem.

DP. Really? Please do cite those churches - from a reputable and non-biased source. A “very real problem,” my a$$.

What is it with all the “cite” this or that? Do you not read broadly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10:35 again and I find this new campaign strategy very demeaning to women - that there are all these woman who want to vote for her but need encouragement because they life with R husbands? WTH. This is not a winning strategy and does not make me like her.

It's not campaign strategy. It's some Harris supporter coming up with an idea to communicate with women that their votes are private, and their spouses don't really know how they're voting.

There was a divorce lawyer who gives free advice to women posting on Twitter that she was receiving a large volume of the same non-divorce related question - 'Can my husband find out how I am voting?'. So there are apparently a lot of women that do have that question. And have relationships where they are not at liberty to say that they're voting differently from their spouses.

Ah - a random divorce lawyer on Twitter made this claim, so it MUST be true! Amazing the nonsense you believe because it fits your narrative.
DP

You really are brainwashed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:does this seem like a lack of momentum?

When theyre paid time and a half plus bused in... yeah!

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To those making sexist misogynistic jokes about Kamala, good job! That’ll make sure women will come out in droves to make sure she’s elected!

Just like women turned out in droves to make sure Hillary was elected

The gender of the candidate is immaterial to a lot of people. It’s the policies that matter. I am a woman supporting Trump, because his policies are a lot better for this country.

We know because you won't shut up about it

DP. And we know that you’d MUCH prefer to only hear from Kamala Harris supporters. Isn’t it just so inconvenient when you can silence people who don’t agree with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10:35 again and I find this new campaign strategy very demeaning to women - that there are all these woman who want to vote for her but need encouragement because they life with R husbands? WTH. This is not a winning strategy and does not make me like her.

It's not campaign strategy. It's some Harris supporter coming up with an idea to communicate with women that their votes are private, and their spouses don't really know how they're voting.

There was a divorce lawyer who gives free advice to women posting on Twitter that she was receiving a large volume of the same non-divorce related question - 'Can my husband find out how I am voting?'. So there are apparently a lot of women that do have that question. And have relationships where they are not at liberty to say that they're voting differently from their spouses.

Ah - a random divorce lawyer on Twitter made this claim, so it MUST be true! Amazing the nonsense you believe because it fits your narrative.
DP

You really are brainwashed.

Brainwashed is thinking that women who vote Republican are afraid of their husbands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Especially for those of you who live in red areas, this is a very good idea.

Excellent!

You want people to associate toilets with Harris/Walz?

No, you're trying to change minds. It's where to find Trump voters who can be swayed.

DP. If I found one of these ridiculous sticky notes in a bathroom stall, I would simply flush it away. You people cannot be serious.

You change one mind that's an extra vote. These aren't targeting you, so decompress.

How utterly insulting to think this tactic would change *anyone’s* mind. But thanks for giving us a glimpse into the smug sanctimony that is the mind of the left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10:35 again and I find this new campaign strategy very demeaning to women - that there are all these woman who want to vote for her but need encouragement because they life with R husbands? WTH. This is not a winning strategy and does not make me like her.

It's not campaign strategy. It's some Harris supporter coming up with an idea to communicate with women that their votes are private, and their spouses don't really know how they're voting.

There was a divorce lawyer who gives free advice to women posting on Twitter that she was receiving a large volume of the same non-divorce related question - 'Can my husband find out how I am voting?'. So there are apparently a lot of women that do have that question. And have relationships where they are not at liberty to say that they're voting differently from their spouses.

Ah - a random divorce lawyer on Twitter made this claim, so it MUST be true! Amazing the nonsense you believe because it fits your narrative.
DP

You really are brainwashed.

I’m not the person who believes Twitter randos.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To those making sexist misogynistic jokes about Kamala, good job! That’ll make sure women will come out in droves to make sure she’s elected!

Just like women turned out in droves to make sure Hillary was elected

The gender of the candidate is immaterial to a lot of people. It’s the policies that matter. I am a woman supporting Trump, because his policies are a lot better for this country.

We know because you won't shut up about it

DP. And we know that you’d MUCH prefer to only hear from Kamala Harris supporters. Isn’t it just so inconvenient when you can silence people who don’t agree with you?

No one is silencing you. Stop playing the victim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10:35 again and I find this new campaign strategy very demeaning to women - that there are all these woman who want to vote for her but need encouragement because they life with R husbands? WTH. This is not a winning strategy and does not make me like her.

This country is full of churches telling women to submit to their husbands.
I think it’s just great you haven’t been affected by that, but it’s a very real problem.

DP. Really? Please do cite those churches - from a reputable and non-biased source. A “very real problem,” my a$$.

What is it with all the “cite” this or that? Do you not read broadly?

That’s the first request for a citation I’ve made here. Can you provide one? And of course I read broadly. Women are unfortunately often victims of domestic abuse regardless of the political leanings of their spouses. How presumptuous to think otherwise.