Joe is out

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, this totally steals Trump's thunder and will be the focus of the news until the DNC convention. Totally ruins their strategy to date. And now the Democratic nominee can distance themselves from whatever unpopular policies there have been under Joe.

Biden's policies have been extremely popular.

Cannot stop laughing at this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have the media pushed out there 'Kamala is great' articles yet? They tried it in 2020 and she came in last place. They should probably do a basement campaign again.

You guys are so scared. Love to see it. The side by side of Trump and her will be enough. Just like the Nixon/JFK debate

I don't think anyone should be worried about debating Trump. He's still a bumbling fool and can't argue out of tin hat. He's entertaining at his rotating comedy routine, oh sorry, his rallies.

His comedy routine is as old and stale and demented as he is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m worried about the national security implications. If Biden can’t run, how can he run the country? This feels very unsafe.

Thanks for repeating the repub talking point around this. Go away troll.

How is it wrong? It is accurate.

[Anonymous]

That trump donated to Harris in 2014 is just amazing. The ads really do write themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris of all people should have seen this coming 4 years ago, and spent 4 years building her brand. But she's a Democrat, and Democrats hate winning.

I think they screwed her. Her main project a super contentious issue that no one has been able to truly fix in decades as the border czar? I think she was set up for failure and that's extremely unfortunate given where we are right now.

she didn't go to the border ONCE!

Both things can be true. She was set up to fail and failed even worse than planned.

Looks like they did something right

The number of migrants unlawfully crossing the U.S. southern border has continued to drop markedly in July, nearing a threshold that would require officials to lift a partial ban on asylum claims enacted by President Biden, according to internal government data obtained by CBS News.

July is on track to see the fifth consecutive monthly drop in migrant apprehensions along the U.S.-Mexico border and the lowest level in illegal immigration there since the fall of 2020, during the Trump administration, the internal Department of Homeland Security figures show.

In early June, President Biden invoked a far-reaching presidential authority to suspend the entry of most migrants entering the U.S. illegally, effectively shutting off access to the American asylum system outside of official ports of entry.

Illegal border crossings — which were already falling before Mr. Biden's action — plunged further after the order took effect, reaching a three-year low in June.[u]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/migrant-crossings-plunge-near-level-lift-biden-border-crackdown/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, this totally steals Trump's thunder and will be the focus of the news until the DNC convention. Totally ruins their strategy to date. And now the Democratic nominee can distance themselves from whatever unpopular policies there have been under Joe.

um no, they have come out swinging tying Harris to Biden, especially regarding the border mess.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4784658-trump-campaign-attacks-harris/

+2 Second to Biden, Harris is Trump’s dream candidate because she owns the border disaster. Funny you liberals can’t see that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance calls on Biden to resign from presidency immediately

I actually agree with him on this. He’s right.

JD thinks he’s VP. Like he has any influence. He’s just like Johnson— a seat filler. They’ll be gone sooner than you think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, this totally steals Trump's thunder and will be the focus of the news until the DNC convention. Totally ruins their strategy to date. And now the Democratic nominee can distance themselves from whatever unpopular policies there have been under Joe.

Biden's policies have been extremely popular.

Yes, they have been but inflation and the issues at the border have been weighing his administration down, despite having an economy that performs better than pretty much any other developed country. Whoever is the nominee can distance themselves from the things that were controversial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Kelly as VP would make everything right. Now his resume is impressive —This has given me hope.

That’s actually a choice that I think makes sense.

I’d love if Pete were selected as VP (him debating Vance would be must see tv) but add homophobia on top of racism and sexism and we’d be really screwed

Oh stop with that nonsense. Pete has been a lousy secretary of transportation and acknowledging that isnt homophobia.

From my vantage point he’s actually got a lot done at DOT despite the actors in his space. You can’t blame Pete for the failures of Boeing

You are free to have a positive opinion of Pete. But to slam people upset about his errors - from the supply chain issues to airplane headaches to the Ohio derailment - as being homophobic is inexcusable. Voters aren’t going to tolerate this kind of name calling when they don’t toe the Democrat line.

Where did I say criticism of his work would be considered homophobic? No, I just said that adding him to a Harris ticket would exacerbate the sexism and racism she will bring with her another ism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris of all people should have seen this coming 4 years ago, and spent 4 years building her brand. But she's a Democrat, and Democrats hate winning.

I think they screwed her. Her main project a super contentious issue that no one has been able to truly fix in decades as the border czar? I think she was set up for failure and that's extremely unfortunate given where we are right now.

she didn't go to the border ONCE!

Both things can be true. She was set up to fail and failed even worse than planned.

Looks like they did something right

The number of migrants unlawfully crossing the U.S. southern border has continued to drop markedly in July, nearing a threshold that would require officials to lift a partial ban on asylum claims enacted by President Biden, according to internal government data obtained by CBS News.

July is on track to see the fifth consecutive monthly drop in migrant apprehensions along the U.S.-Mexico border and the lowest level in illegal immigration there since the fall of 2020, during the Trump administration, the internal Department of Homeland Security figures show.

In early June, President Biden invoked a far-reaching presidential authority to suspend the entry of most migrants entering the U.S. illegally, effectively shutting off access to the American asylum system outside of official ports of entry.

Illegal border crossings — which were already falling before Mr. Biden's action — plunged further after the order took effect, reaching a three-year low in June.[u]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/migrant-crossings-plunge-near-level-lift-biden-border-crackdown/

What a joke. Improvements in July don’t make the illegal crossings for the last three years go away. Wake up!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, this totally steals Trump's thunder and will be the focus of the news until the DNC convention. Totally ruins their strategy to date. And now the Democratic nominee can distance themselves from whatever unpopular policies there have been under Joe.

um no, they have come out swinging tying Harris to Biden, especially regarding the border mess.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4784658-trump-campaign-attacks-harris/

The number of migrants unlawfully crossing the U.S. southern border has continued to drop markedly in July, nearing a threshold that would require officials to lift a partial ban on asylum claims enacted by President Biden, according to internal government data obtained by CBS News.

July is on track to see the fifth consecutive monthly drop in migrant apprehensions along the U.S.-Mexico border and the lowest level in illegal immigration there since the fall of 2020, during the Trump administration, the internal Department of Homeland Security figures show.

In early June, President Biden invoked a far-reaching presidential authority to suspend the entry of most migrants entering the U.S. illegally, effectively shutting off access to the American asylum system outside of official ports of entry.

Illegal border crossings — which were already falling before Mr. Biden's action — plunged further after the order took effect, reaching a three-year low in June.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/migrant-crossings-plunge-near-level-lift-biden-border-crackdown/

Try harder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, this totally steals Trump's thunder and will be the focus of the news until the DNC convention. Totally ruins their strategy to date. And now the Democratic nominee can distance themselves from whatever unpopular policies there have been under Joe.

Biden's policies have been extremely popular.

Yes, they have been but inflation and the issues at the border have been weighing his administration down, despite having an economy that performs better than pretty much any other developed country. Whoever is the nominee can distance themselves from the things that were controversial.

I should have mentioned Gaza/Israel as well. Whoever the nominee is doesn't inherit that baggage.

[Anonymous]

Barack Obama NOT endorsing Kamala Harris: “I have extraordinary confidence that the leaders of our party will be able to create a process from which an outstanding nominee emerges.”

https://barackobama.medium.com/my-statement-on-president-bidens-announcement-1eb78b3ba3fc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m worried about the national security implications. If Biden can’t run, how can he run the country? This feels very unsafe.

Thanks for repeating the repub talking point around this. Go away troll.

How is it wrong? It is accurate.

Admitting he likely doesn’t have 4 more years in him does not mean he’s incapable now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Kelly as VP would make everything right. Now his resume is impressive —This has given me hope.

That’s actually a choice that I think makes sense.

I’d love if Pete were selected as VP (him debating Vance would be must see tv) but add homophobia on top of racism and sexism and we’d be really screwed

Oh stop with that nonsense. Pete has been a lousy secretary of transportation and acknowledging that isnt homophobia.

From my vantage point he’s actually got a lot done at DOT despite the actors in his space. You can’t blame Pete for the failures of Boeing

You are free to have a positive opinion of Pete. But to slam people upset about his errors - from the supply chain issues to airplane headaches to the Ohio derailment - as being homophobic is inexcusable. Voters aren’t going to tolerate this kind of name calling when they don’t toe the Democrat line.

Where did I say criticism of his work would be considered homophobic? No, I just said that adding him to a Harris ticket would exacerbate the sexism and racism she will bring with her another ism.

That’s the entire message I was combating.
“I’d love if Pete were selected as VP (him debating Vance would be must see tv) but add homophobia on top of racism and sexism and we’d be really screwed”

What exactly do you think that sort of comment is alleging?