Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What purportedly “intelligent” moms here are sharing about “conspiracies” makes me very reluctant to allow my children to go on play dates at UMC homes. You people need serious help.

Your assumption that these conspiracy theorists are moms is odd. This is the internet. They could be anyone who googled Charlie Kirk's name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tyler lived with Lance, why TF would he feel the need to text a thorough rundown of the entire murder via text! He lives with this person, why would he text that much, full sentences with punctuation?

Exactly. And leave a confession under his keyboard with two conflicting tenses — showing he would or did?!?!

Also, the roommate isn’t freaking out and the shooter is revealing everything, even though he starts the text saying he wanted to go to his grave with it?? Even a crazy person doesn’t text like that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there a way to ID the bodyguards?

Why are you so hung up on the bodyguards?

Because they were acting suspiciously imo, and I want to know who they are and why they were making those hand signals and what they signified.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:I am watching the press conference and Kash Patel is a complete embarrassment. MAGAs, do you really have faith in this guy? He started out saying, "This is what happens when you let cops be cops." Actually, this is what happens when family members turn the perp in. The FBI had not idea this guy was the shooter.

Oh, please. They collected all the evidence that led to his arrest. Without the images he would have never been captured.

What role did the evidence play? He was turned in by a family member.

Revisiting this post now that we know that it was the images RELEASED BY THE FBI that led the family to contact the killer.
So, the evidence played a huge role in his capture.

What images? Images of Robinson on campus never holding any gun?

The images of him at the scene of the crime. The images of him jumping from the roof.
Turns out - his DNA is on the rifle. On the trigger.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The bodyguards failed miserably.

Oh, please. The bodyguard were there to stop people from rushing him or attacking him face to face.
They did not have security for a shooter that was 150 yards away.

Who are the bodyguards though? That day?

Why is this important?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there a way to ID the bodyguards?

Why are you so hung up on the bodyguards?

Because they were acting suspiciously imo, and I want to know who they are and why they were making those hand signals and what they signified.

Why do they have to tell you that? You think his body guards had something to do with the assassination? You are truly delusional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I heard that the killer was a gay with a trans boyfriend. Is that true or internet rumor?

It’s true. This guy is beyond despicable.

If he was gay that makes him more despicable? I’m very worried that this line of thinking is going to put gay people in danger of even more discrimination and hatred.

People don't want to discriminate or hate gay people. They want to coexist peacefully.

Uh, lady…this is America, not utopia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The New York Times says Tyler Robinson was chatting with 20 individuals online after the FBI released photos of Kirk's alleged killer, which were the spitting image of Robinson.

One person reportedly recognized Robinson, tagging him in a post with the FBI pics and asking where he was at the time of the murder.

Moments later, Robinson responded that it was his doppelganger trying to get him in trouble.

Another person encouraged the others to rat out Robinson to collect the FBI’s $100,000 reward as the manhunt for the killer was in full swing.
https://www.tmz.com/2025/09/14/charlie-kirk-tyler-robinson-online-chats-discord/

And he thought he left no evidence, besides the rifle that he kept worrying about.

He thought he was going to keep a secret until he died of old age. Tragically humorous that he thought this.

The rifle he left in the woods on the edge of campus even though he drove home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What purportedly “intelligent” moms here are sharing about “conspiracies” makes me very reluctant to allow my children to go on play dates at UMC homes. You people need serious help.

These liberals are trying desperately to find something or someone to blame because all the evidence is showing that it was one of them - a radical left winger - who took the life of Charlie Kirk. They simply cannot come to terms with that.

Oh, please. Even Steve Bannon says he’s “not buying the script” in those texts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Somethings suspicious about her relationship with Charlie and I’m sure it will come out in the wash. Maybe Candace Owens or someone else will look into it. Somethings off with her reaction to this whole tragedy

The farewell to Charlie video that Candace Owens posted seemed much more like what a wife would post than the weird thing Erika posted with her kissing his embalmed hands.

By doing that, she changed the imaging from the actual assassination to family love and peace

I don’t think so. The comments under those posts were telling. She literally put a mic on before tearlessly crying over her husband and sending out fundraising texts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The bodyguards failed miserably.

Oh, please. The bodyguard were there to stop people from rushing him or attacking him face to face.
They did not have security for a shooter that was 150 yards away.

Who are the bodyguards though? That day?

Can you please drop this issue about the bodyguards? If you want this information you'll have to find it elsewhere. Like in the many videos of the event, you could look at the obvious bodyguards and then try to figure out who they are if it's so very important to you.

Regardless, after this performance I think they'll need to change fields. Better security would mean Charlie Kirk would still be alive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What purportedly “intelligent” moms here are sharing about “conspiracies” makes me very reluctant to allow my children to go on play dates at UMC homes. You people need serious help.

Your assumption that these conspiracy theorists are moms is odd. This is the internet. They could be anyone who googled Charlie Kirk's name.

I am a mom and you can bet if my child was falsely accused like Tyler is being I would fight till the truth came out, even if the real murderer never had to face the consequences. I would make the truth crystal clear to everyone, and the real criminal would have to live knowing that everyone knows it wasn’t my child it was you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What purportedly “intelligent” moms here are sharing about “conspiracies” makes me very reluctant to allow my children to go on play dates at UMC homes. You people need serious help.

These liberals are trying desperately to find something or someone to blame because all the evidence is showing that it was one of them - a radical left winger - who took the life of Charlie Kirk. They simply cannot come to terms with that.

So all RWNJs speak for you? You’re crazy if you think run if the mill liberals give two craps if this guy was radical left or not. The point is that he was radical. At all. That’s a massive problem where anyone can be radicalized on any topic it seems because the internet is a cesspool of radical [insert topic here] and no one thinks critically anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find it hard to believe that a chronically online, meme-poisoned 22 year old would write texts in the style of a Ken Burns civil war campfire letter.

Not a single emoji or cryptic abbreviation that we old folks have to Google?

Also my boys the same age don’t really text, they use Snapchat or other to message.

[Anonymous]

Anyone know who the bodyguards were that day? Anyone?