Mother of 2 from VERY prominent Richmond family arrested by FBI for child p@rn, exploitation, etc

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The Axios article says she’s being defended by a federal public defender


Most public defenders won't put up much of defense and are there to hold the defendants hand while they plead guilty. Many public defenders are also woke, so they may not have much sympathy for an affluent white Disney princess defendant.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And Axios has picked up the story:

https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2023/04/21/hunton-hoppe-jail-child-pornography


Here is the order denying her request to be released. She tried to argue her father could be a “significant third party custodian” and that she graduated from UVA with 2 degrees so she’s an upstanding citizen and should be released pending trial. Judge said no.

So yeah, she’s using her connections as excuses. Unreal.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.253696/gov.uscourts.dcd.253696.11.0.pdf



I don't remember seeing this detail before.

"The investigation further revealed that Ms. Hoppe allegedly used her own minor daughters as a lure to engage with the undercover officer, whom she believed to have access to a minor child."


The Complaint indicated that she began corresponding with the under cover agent under the guise of discussing “taboo parenting” - ie that she was a parent and she used that status to engage with the agent. Hopefully that’s all they mean here.
Anonymous
Isn’t she only entitled to a public defender is she cannot afford an attorney of her own?

She’s looking at spending a long time in prison. If I were her, I’d want the best attorney money could buy. I’m shocked her family hasn’t hired some well connected, well skilled criminal defense attorney.
Anonymous
Wow. I didn't really understand what was alleged in here and then read the news article. I am shocked and disgusted. Who would do something like this? I'm heartbroken for all of these kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Axios article says she’s being defended by a federal public defender


Most public defenders won't put up much of defense and are there to hold the defendants hand while they plead guilty. Many public defenders are also woke, so they may not have much sympathy for an affluent white Disney princess defendant.


The point of everyone having robust legal defense is not that the individual deserves it, it’s that the health and fairness of the judicial system depends on it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wow. I didn't really understand what was alleged in here and then read the news article. I am shocked and disgusted. Who would do something like this? I'm heartbroken for all of these kids.


Oh wait -- I was assuming that she did hold out her own kids in exchange for access to the other kid/s. No? That seemed the implication to me. And that even if the exchange hadn't happened yet it was understood to be a quid pro quo if she got access to the guys kid/s.

Even without this it's absolutely disgusting, but with it it is mind blowingly I would like to explode my brain awful.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Isn’t she only entitled to a public defender is she cannot afford an attorney of her own?

She’s looking at spending a long time in prison. If I were her, I’d want the best attorney money could buy. I’m shocked her family hasn’t hired some well connected, well skilled criminal defense attorney.


This may very well be intentional.
Anonymous
It is common for the expensive lawyer to take over closer to the hearing date. In the meantime, one is appointed.
Anonymous
Well this made DailyMail so I guess it’s all out there now:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11981565/High-society-child-sex-abuser.html
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn’t she only entitled to a public defender is she cannot afford an attorney of her own?

She’s looking at spending a long time in prison. If I were her, I’d want the best attorney money could buy. I’m shocked her family hasn’t hired some well connected, well skilled criminal defense attorney.


This may very well be intentional.


Her father PERSONALLY got her 2019 sex crime conviction thrown out on appeal.

A high priced lawyer will take over closer to the hearing date, mark my words.
Anonymous
Oh my god that daily mail article and the things she wrote -- i have to stop reading this thread I feel sick.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Well this made DailyMail so I guess it’s all out there now:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11981565/High-society-child-sex-abuser.html


It’s about time- glad it is finally getting picked up
Anonymous
The daily mail article has info on the divorce. HFS!!!!!
Anonymous
This is so horrible and sad. Those poor kids (both hers and the others she distributed images of). Her kids are only 10 and 12. I cannot imagine their pain. How on earth does someone, a mother, do this to kids?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn’t she only entitled to a public defender is she cannot afford an attorney of her own?

She’s looking at spending a long time in prison. If I were her, I’d want the best attorney money could buy. I’m shocked her family hasn’t hired some well connected, well skilled criminal defense attorney.


This may very well be intentional.


Her father PERSONALLY got her 2019 sex crime conviction thrown out on appeal.

A high priced lawyer will take over closer to the hearing date, mark my words.


Entirely possible. But 2019 was four years ago. I can see the point of view of the family if they have done everything they feel they can to help her and aren't going to do any more. From the little I have read/seen she is either suffering from a horrific mental illness or she is an evil person. They may think prison isn't a bad place for her to be at this point.
post reply Forum Index » Off-Topic
Message Quick Reply
Go to: