NYC mayor declares 'emergency' due to migrants

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, because the Mayor can’t handle the influx of illegal immigrants, he’s now imposing and putting the responsibility on churches and private citizens to set up and take care of illegal immigrants?

The Constitution says you can’t be forced to house government soldiers. Doesn’t say they can’t make you house illegal aliens. Here it comes.

It really shouldn’t be that hard. Step one would be identifying owners who have misused property. Step two would be performing background checks on this owners to ensure the migrants are not housed in a potentially unsafe environment. Step three would be assigning migrant families to the appropriate home - close to strong schools, services, transportation, and retail. Finally, the city should provide some sort of monetary stipend to owners of selected underutilized properties to cover the cost of feeding the migrants, laundering, transporting them, assisting with migrant child care if needed, etc.

You’re joking, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, because the Mayor can’t handle the influx of illegal immigrants, he’s now imposing and putting the responsibility on churches and private citizens to set up and take care of illegal immigrants?

The Constitution says you can’t be forced to house government soldiers. Doesn’t say they can’t make you house illegal aliens. Here it comes.

It really shouldn’t be that hard. Step one would be identifying owners who have misused property. Step two would be performing background checks on this owners to ensure the migrants are not housed in a potentially unsafe environment. Step three would be assigning migrant families to the appropriate home - close to strong schools, services, transportation, and retail. Finally, the city should provide some sort of monetary stipend to owners of selected underutilized properties to cover the cost of feeding the migrants, laundering, transporting them, assisting with migrant child care if needed, etc.

This all makes sense, is quite doable, and is an equitable solution; exactly what a responsible government should be doing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, because the Mayor can’t handle the influx of illegal immigrants, he’s now imposing and putting the responsibility on churches and private citizens to set up and take care of illegal immigrants?

The Constitution says you can’t be forced to house government soldiers. Doesn’t say they can’t make you house illegal aliens. Here it comes.

It really shouldn’t be that hard. Step one would be identifying owners who have misused property. Step two would be performing background checks on this owners to ensure the migrants are not housed in a potentially unsafe environment. Step three would be assigning migrant families to the appropriate home - close to strong schools, services, transportation, and retail. Finally, the city should provide some sort of monetary stipend to owners of selected underutilized properties to cover the cost of feeding the migrants, laundering, transporting them, assisting with migrant child care if needed, etc.

How about vetting the migrants themselves to ensure they are not a threat? We could end up with stories like this......

A better solution is to prevent these migrants from entering the US in the first place. We know that 90% of them are not asylum-eligible.
You are suggesting making the American public at large responsible for millions of migrants who have not been vetted, should not be here to begin with, and who are creating economic and security instability in our country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is going to be in every Republican campaign ad until Election Day.

And abortion and January 6 will be in every Democratic ad until Election Day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are the libs still talking about Trump? He’s not even in office anymore. The Dems just want to deflect from the problems they caused. You don’t hear conservatives going on and on about Obama. Who the f cares about anyone who’s no longer in office?

They never even try to fix anything. It’s all protests & finger pointing. They have no plans, they only have slogans screamed into bullhorns.

Project much? LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, because the Mayor can’t handle the influx of illegal immigrants, he’s now imposing and putting the responsibility on churches and private citizens to set up and take care of illegal immigrants?

The Constitution says you can’t be forced to house government soldiers. Doesn’t say they can’t make you house illegal aliens. Here it comes.

It really shouldn’t be that hard. Step one would be identifying owners who have misused property. Step two would be performing background checks on this owners to ensure the migrants are not housed in a potentially unsafe environment. Step three would be assigning migrant families to the appropriate home - close to strong schools, services, transportation, and retail. Finally, the city should provide some sort of monetary stipend to owners of selected underutilized properties to cover the cost of feeding the migrants, laundering, transporting them, assisting with migrant child care if needed, etc.

This all makes sense, is quite doable, and is an equitable solution; exactly what a responsible government should be doing.

So as per AOC we're supposed to present anyone with work documents, benefits, and a path to citizenship. https://www.instagram.com/p/C1rzzt_gpSf/

Then we're supposed to "adopt" a migrant or a family of migrants and get a small payment from the feds to feed, house, do their laundry, provide transportation, and childcare. What am I? Their parent or grandparent? This is not what a respnsible government does. So urban housing in the USSR - govt decided who lived where and now you people think just like that. Govt controlled residency in private housing whether owned or rented. https://kommunalka.colgate.edu/cfm/essays.cfm?ClipID=376

There’s a lot of homes with empty nesters that can be used for the purpose of housing migrants. Unused bedrooms can house three to four people. As for assistance with adjusting, providing nutritious meals, transportation, and cleaning I think given most Americans’ humble immigrant beginnings, it would be an honor to help the newest Americans.
Remember this would only be a temporary set of measures until the migrants received work permits and found suitable homes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, because the Mayor can’t handle the influx of illegal immigrants, he’s now imposing and putting the responsibility on churches and private citizens to set up and take care of illegal immigrants?

The Constitution says you can’t be forced to house government soldiers. Doesn’t say they can’t make you house illegal aliens. Here it comes.

It really shouldn’t be that hard. Step one would be identifying owners who have misused property. Step two would be performing background checks on this owners to ensure the migrants are not housed in a potentially unsafe environment. Step three would be assigning migrant families to the appropriate home - close to strong schools, services, transportation, and retail. Finally, the city should provide some sort of monetary stipend to owners of selected underutilized properties to cover the cost of feeding the migrants, laundering, transporting them, assisting with migrant child care if needed, etc.

This person is clearly mentally challenged. No bureaucrat is coming over to people's houses, trumping up violations of misuse and then assigning individuals or families to your house.

Long before that happens, the second amendment takes hold (which is exactly why you need it - for control freaks like the poster).

Another “‘Murica” squeaking, 2A fetishist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, because the Mayor can’t handle the influx of illegal immigrants, he’s now imposing and putting the responsibility on churches and private citizens to set up and take care of illegal immigrants?

The Constitution says you can’t be forced to house government soldiers. Doesn’t say they can’t make you house illegal aliens. Here it comes.

It really shouldn’t be that hard. Step one would be identifying owners who have misused property. Step two would be performing background checks on this owners to ensure the migrants are not housed in a potentially unsafe environment. Step three would be assigning migrant families to the appropriate home - close to strong schools, services, transportation, and retail. Finally, the city should provide some sort of monetary stipend to owners of selected underutilized properties to cover the cost of feeding the migrants, laundering, transporting them, assisting with migrant child care if needed, etc.

This all makes sense, is quite doable, and is an equitable solution; exactly what a responsible government should be doing.

So as per AOC we're supposed to present anyone with work documents, benefits, and a path to citizenship. https://www.instagram.com/p/C1rzzt_gpSf/

Then we're supposed to "adopt" a migrant or a family of migrants and get a small payment from the feds to feed, house, do their laundry, provide transportation, and childcare. What am I? Their parent or grandparent? This is not what a respnsible government does. So urban housing in the USSR - govt decided who lived where and now you people think just like that. Govt controlled residency in private housing whether owned or rented. https://kommunalka.colgate.edu/cfm/essays.cfm?ClipID=376

There’s a lot of homes with empty nesters that can be used for the purpose of housing migrants. Unused bedrooms can house three to four people. As for assistance with adjusting, providing nutritious meals, transportation, and cleaning I think given most Americans’ humble immigrant beginnings, it would be an honor to help the newest Americans.
Remember this would only be a temporary set of measures until the migrants received work permits and found suitable homes.

Remember, there is nothing so permanent as a temporary government program.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NYC is a sanctuary city. I don’t understand how this could be an emergency.

because a bunch were dumped on them by another state who had no authority to do that. Those governors lied to the people and were basically human traffickers for a political stunt.

Waahh..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, because the Mayor can’t handle the influx of illegal immigrants, he’s now imposing and putting the responsibility on churches and private citizens to set up and take care of illegal immigrants?

The Constitution says you can’t be forced to house government soldiers. Doesn’t say they can’t make you house illegal aliens. Here it comes.

It really shouldn’t be that hard. Step one would be identifying owners who have misused property. Step two would be performing background checks on this owners to ensure the migrants are not housed in a potentially unsafe environment. Step three would be assigning migrant families to the appropriate home - close to strong schools, services, transportation, and retail. Finally, the city should provide some sort of monetary stipend to owners of selected underutilized properties to cover the cost of feeding the migrants, laundering, transporting them, assisting with migrant child care if needed, etc.

How about vetting the migrants themselves to ensure they are not a threat? We could end up with stories like this......

A better solution is to prevent these migrants from entering the US in the first place. We know that 90% of them are not asylum-eligible.
You are suggesting making the American public at large responsible for millions of migrants who have not been vetted, should not be here to begin with, and who are creating economic and security instability in our country.

And how do you determine they are ineligible? Do you think some dude named Jim Bob can just eyeball them and size them up and say "mm, ah don' like the looks of this here dude." Our current laws say there is a process for this, and a formal decision is made to adjudicate the case. It involves judges and other pieces of legal framework. And since that's the law, that's what we're stuck with. Republicans have not put any coherent proposals out there as alternatives. Nor have they allowed any of that backlog of determinations to be sped up because they refuse funding for more judges and staff to hear those cases. So we can't get rid of them, either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is going to be in every Republican campaign ad until Election Day.

As it should be.

It's awesome to see people living with the consequences of their votes. Chicago too.

+2
I'd love for them to try this in a wealthy area where parents are well-educated and not about to put up with this garbage. So telling that they chose a school in which most of the student body are minorities and probably poor. Those parents aren't going to put up a fight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congresswoman from New York explains why she supports illegal immigration:

"I need more people in my district JUST FOR REDISTRICTING PURPOSES.”

These Democrats are looking out for themselves, not for America.

Interesting. Where does Clarke live? Sounds like she's up for a busload or two at her home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The difference in coverage between the New York Post and the New York Daily News on this issue is remarkable. NYP discusses the impact on students, DN ignores the issue and talks about 60 day evictions for migrants.

The NY Daily News article focused almost exclusively on the impact this has on the migrants - those here illegally.
https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/01/09/city-hall-orders-migrants-at-floyd-bennett-to-be-evacuated-to-brooklyn-high-school/

Same with the NY Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/09/nyregion/migrant-families-floyd-bennett-tent-evacuation-rain.html

Amazing, really. The citizens who live in the city and pay exorbitant taxes that pay for education and are forced to educate children remotely are ignored by these publications.

DP. Why are New York residents not outraged about this? Not just the one mother in the video clip - but ALL parents? How can this be happening and seemingly no one is batting an eye?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, because the Mayor can’t handle the influx of illegal immigrants, he’s now imposing and putting the responsibility on churches and private citizens to set up and take care of illegal immigrants?

The Constitution says you can’t be forced to house government soldiers. Doesn’t say they can’t make you house illegal aliens. Here it comes.

It really shouldn’t be that hard. Step one would be identifying owners who have misused property. Step two would be performing background checks on this owners to ensure the migrants are not housed in a potentially unsafe environment. Step three would be assigning migrant families to the appropriate home - close to strong schools, services, transportation, and retail. Finally, the city should provide some sort of monetary stipend to owners of selected underutilized properties to cover the cost of feeding the migrants, laundering, transporting them, assisting with migrant child care if needed, etc.

Really hoping this is satire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They’ve run out of hotel rooms, are kicking kids out of school for illegal housing and now they want your homes too.

How much more evidence do we need that Washington is orchestrating an invasion of this country?

This issue, more than any other, shows Washington’s commitment to national security and the safety and prosperity of its citizens to be a sham, but above all, it exposes the fraud of “our democracy.”

Mass immigration not only puts enormous strain on public services and the labor market—rendering the progressive agenda a farce—but it dilutes the political power of the average citizen. Like war, mass immigration enriches donors, reinforces patronage, and insulates government officials from democratic challenges. Mass immigration is a betrayal, for it severs the connection between elected officials and their voters, relieving lawmakers of their promises and obligations and redistributing the power of the electorate to a managed constituency. Mass immigration allows corrupt and derelict leaders to rely on suffrage to shield them from reform. If you have any doubts, just take a look at the once-great State of California.

This manufactured crisis is an assault on our sovereignty, our way of life, and the last remains of our democratic system. Clearly Washington fears the US electorate and hopes to stave off any threat of reform by importing another.

This may be the greatest betrayal our country has ever seen.

Well said. It's beyond shocking that every day seems to bring a new low.