So what kind of King will Charles be?

[Anonymous]

Camilla had tomatoes thrown at her during the Diana days. Life's come full circle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The kind that gets eggs thrown at him in public

York has a long history of being problematic for the Crown! It’s pretty far from London.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The kind that gets eggs thrown at him in public

York has a long history of being problematic for the Crown! It’s pretty far from London.

Interesting that the royals are getting booed and egged in all parts of the U.K. now. Are you saying only London is safe?

[Anonymous]

I wonder if he will be a scrambled or over easy king?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bunch of hypocrites here. Monarchy is awful, antiquated institution, most of you say, but how dare Harry and Meg not put up with it and enforce it and work for it, and just shut up, they just need to shut up and be representatives of the colonizers in 2022.

I’m not a big harry and Megan follower but I was impressed when they said they were leaving to strike out on their own. But then it doesn’t seem like they are actually doing that. Is she going on casting calls? Is he going back to school to get an education in something useful? Or maybe he could be a personal trainer? I don’t know what he’s qualified to do. She should get an acting gig and he could be a SAHD. And they should just never mention the BRF in public again.

Lol, they would never lower themselves to WORK. Not when they can sell out their family for $$$$.

I assume you are also willing to criticize Mike Tindall, who just signed on for Im a Celebrity Get Me Out of Here? A little tackier than a podcast about sexism IMO.

I’ll criticize Mike Tindall when he goes on Oprah and trashed his in-laws.

Oprah is not interested in interviewing someone like him lol. So what you are saying is that he can do no wrong in your eyes.

That’s right, he hasn’t done anything egregious.

No…because no one is interested in an old meathead or Anne’s children. He’s done plenty egregious like cheating on his wife within a year of marriage and groping a PA on the trashy reality show he’s on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:India is demanding the Kohinoor diamond back LOL.

So is Pakistan and Afghanistan.

I have seen the Guardian News article related to the dispute, your comment is most likely based on that. I also have researched this and the diamond in the royal scepter. I was disappointed at the poor quality of reporting, it didn’t do justice to the history of the diamond or the controversy surrounding the stone.
India is not wrong to ask for it back and I agree with them on this
I really do not know your level of ignorance, but if you would know your subject matter better you most likely would agree too

My point is, more than one country wants it. Who decides especially when the country hat has it claims it was a gift? Stop being insulting.

Please read some more history
It was a war loot, never a gift
Before that it was legally owned by India

no.. not really, it was owned by raja Ranjit Singh who's heir was forced to give it to Queen Victoria. The Raja was the Raja of the Punjab/Lahore, so it should be returned to at the Sikh community in either Lahore (there is a temple and community there) or Amritsar. The diamond has more ties to the Muslim/Sikh peoples of India than the Hindu and India is fast becoming hindu theocracy so I really dont think it should be given to them. Bharat isn't Hindustan, that India no longer exists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:India is demanding the Kohinoor diamond back LOL.

So is Pakistan and Afghanistan.

I have seen the Guardian News article related to the dispute, your comment is most likely based on that. I also have researched this and the diamond in the royal scepter. I was disappointed at the poor quality of reporting, it didn’t do justice to the history of the diamond or the controversy surrounding the stone.
India is not wrong to ask for it back and I agree with them on this
I really do not know your level of ignorance, but if you would know your subject matter better you most likely would agree too

My point is, more than one country wants it. Who decides especially when the country hat has it claims it was a gift? Stop being insulting.

Please read some more history
It was a war loot, never a gift
Before that it was legally owned by India

no.. not really, it was owned by raja Ranjit Singh who's heir was forced to give it to Queen Victoria. The Raja was the Raja of the Punjab/Lahore, so it should be returned to at the Sikh community in either Lahore (there is a temple and community there) or Amritsar. The diamond has more ties to the Muslim/Sikh peoples of India than the Hindu and India is fast becoming hindu theocracy so I really dont think it should be given to them. Bharat isn't Hindustan, that India no longer exists.

So clearly no one knows who the true owner is of the diamond.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The kind that gets eggs thrown at him in public

York has a long history of being problematic for the Crown! It’s pretty far from London.

Interesting that the royals are getting booed and egged in all parts of the U.K. now. Are you saying only London is safe?

Charles and Camilla will never have the people’s hearts!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:India is demanding the Kohinoor diamond back LOL.

So is Pakistan and Afghanistan.

I have seen the Guardian News article related to the dispute, your comment is most likely based on that. I also have researched this and the diamond in the royal scepter. I was disappointed at the poor quality of reporting, it didn’t do justice to the history of the diamond or the controversy surrounding the stone.
India is not wrong to ask for it back and I agree with them on this
I really do not know your level of ignorance, but if you would know your subject matter better you most likely would agree too

My point is, more than one country wants it. Who decides especially when the country hat has it claims it was a gift? Stop being insulting.

Please read some more history
It was a war loot, never a gift
Before that it was legally owned by India

no.. not really, it was owned by raja Ranjit Singh who's heir was forced to give it to Queen Victoria. The Raja was the Raja of the Punjab/Lahore, so it should be returned to at the Sikh community in either Lahore (there is a temple and community there) or Amritsar. The diamond has more ties to the Muslim/Sikh peoples of India than the Hindu and India is fast becoming hindu theocracy so I really dont think it should be given to them. Bharat isn't Hindustan, that India no longer exists.

So clearly no one knows who the true owner is of the diamond.

Not the British for sure

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Based on the comments above it sounds like we need to give the Americas back to the Indians. We all need to go back to Europe, etc. m I’m sure most Indians would love to have their land back and be how they were before they were invaded and conquered.

You don’t have to go back but we’d like to be compensated for what was taken from us.

-Indigenous American

By whom? The takers are dead.

By All of us who are still taking advantage of the stolen land

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bunch of hypocrites here. Monarchy is awful, antiquated institution, most of you say, but how dare Harry and Meg not put up with it and enforce it and work for it, and just shut up, they just need to shut up and be representatives of the colonizers in 2022.

I’m not a big harry and Megan follower but I was impressed when they said they were leaving to strike out on their own. But then it doesn’t seem like they are actually doing that. Is she going on casting calls? Is he going back to school to get an education in something useful? Or maybe he could be a personal trainer? I don’t know what he’s qualified to do. She should get an acting gig and he could be a SAHD. And they should just never mention the BRF in public again.

Lol, they would never lower themselves to WORK. Not when they can sell out their family for $$$$.

I assume you are also willing to criticize Mike Tindall, who just signed on for Im a Celebrity Get Me Out of Here? A little tackier than a podcast about sexism IMO.

I’ll criticize Mike Tindall when he goes on Oprah and trashed his in-laws.

Oprah is not interested in interviewing someone like him lol. So what you are saying is that he can do no wrong in your eyes.

That’s right, he hasn’t done anything egregious.

Peddling domino’s pizza. And amazon.
Tacky!

[Anonymous]

Daily Mail is saying that Charles plans to give the Duchess of Edinburgh title to Princess Charlotte. Looks like poor Edward might be out of luck.

[Anonymous]

Waiting to see all these radical changes from Charles. Maybe after coronation?

[Anonymous]

Charles finally makes his youngest brother Duke of Edinburgh on Edward’s 59th birthday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Charles finally makes his youngest brother Duke of Edinburgh on Edward’s 59th birthday.

I'm glad he's honoring his father's wishes. It will mean a lot to Edward.