Framing Britney Spears

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Honestly I'm starting to believe she's under the conservatorship because she has the intelligence level (and decision-making abilities) of a 8-year-old.

Quite frankly she's being targeted by these grifters who see children with her as a free ticket to $20K a month for 18 years.

It's not a crime to be an idiot though so...have at it.

+1. In addition to KFed's $20K/month, Sam Lutfi got a settlement. Men getting involved with Britney seem to come out ahead financially.

And, what’s your point? Again, it’s totally her choice if that’s where she wants her money to go. I don’t see any outrage or calls for conservatorship for the numerous male celebrities having multiple children with different baby mamas and paying them child support for the rest of their lives (Donald Trump, Nick Cannon, any rocker or rapper). Do you even hear your misogyny?

I'm not arguing the conservatorship should continue. You must have missed the "have at it." Let the feeding frenzy of grifters begin!

DP. Do you not understand that the feeding frenzy of grifters began long ago? Lots of people have been making millions off of this supposedly incapacitated woman for well over a decade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Honestly I'm starting to believe she's under the conservatorship because she has the intelligence level (and decision-making abilities) of a 8-year-old.

Quite frankly she's being targeted by these grifters who see children with her as a free ticket to $20K a month for 18 years.

It's not a crime to be an idiot though so...have at it.

+1. In addition to KFed's $20K/month, Sam Lutfi got a settlement. Men getting involved with Britney seem to come out ahead financially.

And, what’s your point? Again, it’s totally her choice if that’s where she wants her money to go. I don’t see any outrage or calls for conservatorship for the numerous male celebrities having multiple children with different baby mamas and paying them child support for the rest of their lives (Donald Trump, Nick Cannon, any rocker or rapper). Do you even hear your misogyny?

I'm not arguing the conservatorship should continue. You must have missed the "have at it." Let the feeding frenzy of grifters begin!

DP. Do you not understand that the feeding frenzy of grifters began long ago? Lots of people have been making millions off of this supposedly incapacitated woman for well over a decade.

Including her. Without the conservatorship, would she have? Unlikely.

That's not the only measure of a person's success but it is one measure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Honestly I'm starting to believe she's under the conservatorship because she has the intelligence level (and decision-making abilities) of a 8-year-old.

Quite frankly she's being targeted by these grifters who see children with her as a free ticket to $20K a month for 18 years.

It's not a crime to be an idiot though so...have at it.

+1. In addition to KFed's $20K/month, Sam Lutfi got a settlement. Men getting involved with Britney seem to come out ahead financially.

And, what’s your point? Again, it’s totally her choice if that’s where she wants her money to go. I don’t see any outrage or calls for conservatorship for the numerous male celebrities having multiple children with different baby mamas and paying them child support for the rest of their lives (Donald Trump, Nick Cannon, any rocker or rapper). Do you even hear your misogyny?

+1. It’s abundantly clear that sexism and misogyny have played a big role in what’s happened to Britney and why people think it’s acceptable. The woman hasn’t been allowed to have her own phone for over a decade! The people in charge of Britney want to control her so they can profit off of her. That’s what this is about.

What’s clear is most of you have never had to deal with anyone who suffers with severe mental illness. Queue the “I have and it wasn’t that bad/difficult and they are fine” posters.

The vast majority of Americans coping with mental illness are permitted to be in charge of their own lives. They are allowed to hire their own attorneys and to own and use phones. If you have special evidence indicating that Britney should not be included among those Americans despite maintaining an enormously successful and lucrative career, please do share.

Yes, but maybe they shouldn't be.

We closed the mental institutions and replaced them with Nothing. That doesn't mean it's the best way.

You seem really anxious to strip millions of people of their rights. America might not be the best country for you. We are kind of big on rights here.

Also I assume you have never had any mental health difficulties or taken any drugs for your mental health. If you have, maybe we should question whether you should be stripped of your rights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Honestly I'm starting to believe she's under the conservatorship because she has the intelligence level (and decision-making abilities) of a 8-year-old.

Quite frankly she's being targeted by these grifters who see children with her as a free ticket to $20K a month for 18 years.

It's not a crime to be an idiot though so...have at it.

+1. In addition to KFed's $20K/month, Sam Lutfi got a settlement. Men getting involved with Britney seem to come out ahead financially.

And, what’s your point? Again, it’s totally her choice if that’s where she wants her money to go. I don’t see any outrage or calls for conservatorship for the numerous male celebrities having multiple children with different baby mamas and paying them child support for the rest of their lives (Donald Trump, Nick Cannon, any rocker or rapper). Do you even hear your misogyny?

I'm not arguing the conservatorship should continue. You must have missed the "have at it." Let the feeding frenzy of grifters begin!

The feeding frenzy of grifters began long ago, with the biggest grifter of them all... her father.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Honestly I'm starting to believe she's under the conservatorship because she has the intelligence level (and decision-making abilities) of a 8-year-old.

Quite frankly she's being targeted by these grifters who see children with her as a free ticket to $20K a month for 18 years.

It's not a crime to be an idiot though so...have at it.

+1. In addition to KFed's $20K/month, Sam Lutfi got a settlement. Men getting involved with Britney seem to come out ahead financially.

And, what’s your point? Again, it’s totally her choice if that’s where she wants her money to go. I don’t see any outrage or calls for conservatorship for the numerous male celebrities having multiple children with different baby mamas and paying them child support for the rest of their lives (Donald Trump, Nick Cannon, any rocker or rapper). Do you even hear your misogyny?

I'm not arguing the conservatorship should continue. You must have missed the "have at it." Let the feeding frenzy of grifters begin!

The feeding frenzy of grifters began long ago, with the biggest grifter of them all... her father.

+1. Yep, exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s sad because she was very clearly having a mental health crisis when this began.

But it is bizarre how it evolved.

The media doesn't have the sealed court documents or case file. At her age she shouldn't be having anymore children with yet another partner. I'm seeing some clear signs of poor judgement, and possibly manic behavior. It's sad, but apparently she has a illness which the court has the documentation, NOT TMZ. Or other media hacks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Honestly I'm starting to believe she's under the conservatorship because she has the intelligence level (and decision-making abilities) of a 8-year-old.

Quite frankly she's being targeted by these grifters who see children with her as a free ticket to $20K a month for 18 years.

It's not a crime to be an idiot though so...have at it.

+1. In addition to KFed's $20K/month, Sam Lutfi got a settlement. Men getting involved with Britney seem to come out ahead financially.

And, what’s your point? Again, it’s totally her choice if that’s where she wants her money to go. I don’t see any outrage or calls for conservatorship for the numerous male celebrities having multiple children with different baby mamas and paying them child support for the rest of their lives (Donald Trump, Nick Cannon, any rocker or rapper). Do you even hear your misogyny?

+1. It’s abundantly clear that sexism and misogyny have played a big role in what’s happened to Britney and why people think it’s acceptable. The woman hasn’t been allowed to have her own phone for over a decade! The people in charge of Britney want to control her so they can profit off of her. That’s what this is about.

What’s clear is most of you have never had to deal with anyone who suffers with severe mental illness. Queue the “I have and it wasn’t that bad/difficult and they are fine” posters.

The vast majority of Americans coping with mental illness are permitted to be in charge of their own lives. They are allowed to hire their own attorneys and to own and use phones. If you have special evidence indicating that Britney should not be included among those Americans despite maintaining an enormously successful and lucrative career, please do share.

Yes, but maybe they shouldn't be.

We closed the mental institutions and replaced them with Nothing. That doesn't mean it's the best way.

You seem really anxious to strip millions of people of their rights. America might not be the best country for you. We are kind of big on rights here.

Also I assume you have never had any mental health difficulties or taken any drugs for your mental health. If you have, maybe we should question whether you should be stripped of your rights.

You seem to be completely blind of the millions of homeless people walking around with clear mental illness. America is perfect for you Bc you can pretend everything is ok and that people are fine when they live on the streets in their own filth and talk to the sky. You’ll be much happier when that is Britney Spears Bc at least she will be “free.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Honestly I'm starting to believe she's under the conservatorship because she has the intelligence level (and decision-making abilities) of a 8-year-old.

Quite frankly she's being targeted by these grifters who see children with her as a free ticket to $20K a month for 18 years.

It's not a crime to be an idiot though so...have at it.

+1. In addition to KFed's $20K/month, Sam Lutfi got a settlement. Men getting involved with Britney seem to come out ahead financially.

And, what’s your point? Again, it’s totally her choice if that’s where she wants her money to go. I don’t see any outrage or calls for conservatorship for the numerous male celebrities having multiple children with different baby mamas and paying them child support for the rest of their lives (Donald Trump, Nick Cannon, any rocker or rapper). Do you even hear your misogyny?

+1. It’s abundantly clear that sexism and misogyny have played a big role in what’s happened to Britney and why people think it’s acceptable. The woman hasn’t been allowed to have her own phone for over a decade! The people in charge of Britney want to control her so they can profit off of her. That’s what this is about.

Right? Kanye West has been unstable for a long time and he's not under a conservatorship.

That's because there's no one who loves him enough to do it.

GMAFB. You have no idea who loves Kanye West or how much.

Dp. Go take your break. The only person who truly loved Kanye was his mother and she’s dead. No one cares enough to push to get him the help he clearly needs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s sad because she was very clearly having a mental health crisis when this began.

But it is bizarre how it evolved.

The media doesn't have the sealed court documents or case file. At her age she shouldn't be having anymore children with yet another partner. I'm seeing some clear signs of poor judgement, and possibly manic behavior. It's sad, but apparently she has a illness which the court has the documentation, NOT TMZ. Or other media hacks.

Oh please. Leave her alone. I didn’t hear this much outrage when Charlie Sheen was drinking tiger blood and cavorting with hookers while also still working on TV. He’s fathered 5 kids with 3 different women and clearly has mental issues yet no one is demanding a conservatorship for him. Maybe ask yourself why you feel the need to defend this abnormally restrictive conservatorship for a woman?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Honestly I'm starting to believe she's under the conservatorship because she has the intelligence level (and decision-making abilities) of a 8-year-old.

Quite frankly she's being targeted by these grifters who see children with her as a free ticket to $20K a month for 18 years.

It's not a crime to be an idiot though so...have at it.

+1. In addition to KFed's $20K/month, Sam Lutfi got a settlement. Men getting involved with Britney seem to come out ahead financially.

And, what’s your point? Again, it’s totally her choice if that’s where she wants her money to go. I don’t see any outrage or calls for conservatorship for the numerous male celebrities having multiple children with different baby mamas and paying them child support for the rest of their lives (Donald Trump, Nick Cannon, any rocker or rapper). Do you even hear your misogyny?

+1. It’s abundantly clear that sexism and misogyny have played a big role in what’s happened to Britney and why people think it’s acceptable. The woman hasn’t been allowed to have her own phone for over a decade! The people in charge of Britney want to control her so they can profit off of her. That’s what this is about.

Right? Kanye West has been unstable for a long time and he's not under a conservatorship.

You don't know what his medical condition is, or BS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s sad because she was very clearly having a mental health crisis when this began.

But it is bizarre how it evolved.

The media doesn't have the sealed court documents or case file. At her age she shouldn't be having anymore children with yet another partner. I'm seeing some clear signs of poor judgement, and possibly manic behavior. It's sad, but apparently she has a illness which the court has the documentation, NOT TMZ. Or other media hacks.

Oh please. Leave her alone. I didn’t hear this much outrage when Charlie Sheen was drinking tiger blood and cavorting with hookers while also still working on TV. He’s fathered 5 kids with 3 different women and clearly has mental issues yet no one is demanding a conservatorship for him. Maybe ask yourself why you feel the need to defend this abnormally restrictive conservatorship for a woman?

Addiction and mental illness isn't the same. She may be schizophrenia for all you know. In short WE don't have those facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Honestly I'm starting to believe she's under the conservatorship because she has the intelligence level (and decision-making abilities) of a 8-year-old.

Quite frankly she's being targeted by these grifters who see children with her as a free ticket to $20K a month for 18 years.

It's not a crime to be an idiot though so...have at it.

+1. In addition to KFed's $20K/month, Sam Lutfi got a settlement. Men getting involved with Britney seem to come out ahead financially.

And, what’s your point? Again, it’s totally her choice if that’s where she wants her money to go. I don’t see any outrage or calls for conservatorship for the numerous male celebrities having multiple children with different baby mamas and paying them child support for the rest of their lives (Donald Trump, Nick Cannon, any rocker or rapper). Do you even hear your misogyny?

I'm not arguing the conservatorship should continue. You must have missed the "have at it." Let the feeding frenzy of grifters begin!

The feeding frenzy of grifters began long ago, with the biggest grifter of them all... her father.

+1. Yep, exactly.

I'm not seeing that re her father. He's getting paid $10K a month to handle the financial affairs of a multi-million dollar empire. That's peanuts in comparison to what an actual financial advisor or CFO would be making. He's not off buying mansions for himself in her name. Doesn't have a yacht or a fleet of cars.

He seems to have been protecting her interests as best as he's able to. I mean if someone has seen proof that he siphoned off $50 million in a Cayman bank account, sure share. But exactly how has he grifted her?

If left to her own devices she'd be penniless with 10 children ala Tori Spelling without a mom to hold back the fortune.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Honestly I'm starting to believe she's under the conservatorship because she has the intelligence level (and decision-making abilities) of a 8-year-old.

Quite frankly she's being targeted by these grifters who see children with her as a free ticket to $20K a month for 18 years.

It's not a crime to be an idiot though so...have at it.

+1. In addition to KFed's $20K/month, Sam Lutfi got a settlement. Men getting involved with Britney seem to come out ahead financially.

And, what’s your point? Again, it’s totally her choice if that’s where she wants her money to go. I don’t see any outrage or calls for conservatorship for the numerous male celebrities having multiple children with different baby mamas and paying them child support for the rest of their lives (Donald Trump, Nick Cannon, any rocker or rapper). Do you even hear your misogyny?

+1. It’s abundantly clear that sexism and misogyny have played a big role in what’s happened to Britney and why people think it’s acceptable. The woman hasn’t been allowed to have her own phone for over a decade! The people in charge of Britney want to control her so they can profit off of her. That’s what this is about.

What’s clear is most of you have never had to deal with anyone who suffers with severe mental illness. Queue the “I have and it wasn’t that bad/difficult and they are fine” posters.

The vast majority of Americans coping with mental illness are permitted to be in charge of their own lives. They are allowed to hire their own attorneys and to own and use phones. If you have special evidence indicating that Britney should not be included among those Americans despite maintaining an enormously successful and lucrative career, please do share.

Yes, but maybe they shouldn't be.

We closed the mental institutions and replaced them with Nothing. That doesn't mean it's the best way.

You seem really anxious to strip millions of people of their rights. America might not be the best country for you. We are kind of big on rights here.

Also I assume you have never had any mental health difficulties or taken any drugs for your mental health. If you have, maybe we should question whether you should be stripped of your rights.

You seem to be completely blind of the millions of homeless people walking around with clear mental illness. America is perfect for you Bc you can pretend everything is ok and that people are fine when they live on the streets in their own filth and talk to the sky. You’ll be much happier when that is Britney Spears Bc at least she will be “free.”

Britney is not homeless and she will never be homeless. She has ample funds for a home as well as mental health care.

I bet I could find some seriously questionable choices you’ve made if I knew your life. However I will defend your right to make them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Honestly I'm starting to believe she's under the conservatorship because she has the intelligence level (and decision-making abilities) of a 8-year-old.

Quite frankly she's being targeted by these grifters who see children with her as a free ticket to $20K a month for 18 years.

It's not a crime to be an idiot though so...have at it.

+1. In addition to KFed's $20K/month, Sam Lutfi got a settlement. Men getting involved with Britney seem to come out ahead financially.

And, what’s your point? Again, it’s totally her choice if that’s where she wants her money to go. I don’t see any outrage or calls for conservatorship for the numerous male celebrities having multiple children with different baby mamas and paying them child support for the rest of their lives (Donald Trump, Nick Cannon, any rocker or rapper). Do you even hear your misogyny?

I'm not arguing the conservatorship should continue. You must have missed the "have at it." Let the feeding frenzy of grifters begin!

The feeding frenzy of grifters began long ago, with the biggest grifter of them all... her father.

+1. Yep, exactly.

I'm not seeing that re her father. He's getting paid $10K a month to handle the financial affairs of a multi-million dollar empire. That's peanuts in comparison to what an actual financial advisor or CFO would be making. He's not off buying mansions for himself in her name. Doesn't have a yacht or a fleet of cars.

He seems to have been protecting her interests as best as he's able to. I mean if someone has seen proof that he siphoned off $50 million in a Cayman bank account, sure share. But exactly how has he grifted her?

If left to her own devices she'd be penniless with 10 children ala Tori Spelling without a mom to hold back the fortune.

Do you think Tori should be stripped of her rights too?

The New Yorker piece proves Britney’s father took away her access to a phone and cut off her contact with anyone he considered sympathetic to her, including her housekeeper and assistant - all while taking a percentage of her earnings. All evidence suggests he made more from her per year than her yearly allowance. Also, in the midst of her initial crisis where he gained conservatorship, he told her she was fat and he was going to get her a trainer so she could get back on TV. It’s obvious he is a predator.

[Anonymous]

Tori is a very sad case, as well.

She probably should have someone take control of her finances at least