Framing Britney Spears

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Poor girl

+1

[Anonymous]

Ok i’m sold and going to watch

[Anonymous]

I watched it. It's good. I really feel for her.

[Anonymous]

Acquiring fame and wealth at a young age almost always ends poorly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There’s a lot to be outraged about on her behalf, but the co-conservator petitioning the court for not only more money, but a change in status to a conservatorship/business arrangement hybrid was particularly disgusting. “Force her to accept me as a business partner, judge!”

What a great gig he had. Just sit back and let the money roll in.

To echo a PP’s point, the one really new bit of info for me was that she pays for lawyers for everyone.

Did anyone watch the short reality series Britney did with KFed many years ago? Felicia (her “assistant”) was in that quite a bit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Poor girl

I agree, it's sad but I think people, specifically her fans need to understand that they do not know Britney , nor do they ave have access to the whole of her story meaning legal and medical records, and it's concerning that they think it's their duty to rescue her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor girl

I agree, it's sad but I think people, specifically her fans need to understand that they do not know Britney , nor do they ave have access to the whole of her story meaning legal and medical records, and it's concerning that they think it's their duty to rescue her.

One of the women behind the Free Britney movement acknowledged that, and said that they would be happy to back off if Britney asked them to, of her own free will.

Maybe it’s not their duty to rescue her, but there’s potentially a lot to be concerned about here, and Britney isn’t allowed to do a damn thing about it. If she is that bad off she should NOT be allowed to be pimped out to Vegas venues to create revenue for her conservators!

[Anonymous]

I want the 90 minutes back I wasted watching this garbage

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor girl

I agree, it's sad but I think people, specifically her fans need to understand that they do not know Britney , nor do they ave have access to the whole of her story meaning legal and medical records, and it's concerning that they think it's their duty to rescue her.

One of the women behind the Free Britney movement acknowledged that, and said that they would be happy to back off if Britney asked them to, of her own free will.

Maybe it’s not their duty to rescue her, but there’s potentially a lot to be concerned about here, and Britney isn’t allowed to do a damn thing about it. If she is that bad off she should NOT be allowed to be pimped out to Vegas venues to create revenue for her conservators!

Is a mentally ill woman likely to do that though? She's mentally ill and severely so, of course, she doesn't think there's anything wrong. She hasn't had the show in years, so maybe at the time she had it they thought she was more stable than she was, but isn't. Half of y'all aren't old enough to remember what it was like before the conservatorship., suffice it to say odds were pretty high Britney would be dead by now.


I think it's a huge problem that you and her stans think it's appropriate to behave like this, and demand things and shows just how badly the lines have been blurred.


This event even about mental health and being concerned about those rights if it were you all would go lobby your politicians. This is about some weird cult-like worship of a celebrity that you all think is infallible and delusions of it goign back to 2001 with Britney touring the globe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I want the 90 minutes back I wasted watching this garbage

It's like that Quanon junk

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor girl

I agree, it's sad but I think people, specifically her fans need to understand that they do not know Britney , nor do they ave have access to the whole of her story meaning legal and medical records, and it's concerning that they think it's their duty to rescue her.

One of the women behind the Free Britney movement acknowledged that, and said that they would be happy to back off if Britney asked them to, of her own free will.

Maybe it’s not their duty to rescue her, but there’s potentially a lot to be concerned about here, and Britney isn’t allowed to do a damn thing about it. If she is that bad off she should NOT be allowed to be pimped out to Vegas venues to create revenue for her conservators!

Is a mentally ill woman likely to do that though? She's mentally ill and severely so, of course, she doesn't think there's anything wrong. She hasn't had the show in years, so maybe at the time she had it they thought she was more stable than she was, but isn't. Half of y'all aren't old enough to remember what it was like before the conservatorship., suffice it to say odds were pretty high Britney would be dead by now.


I think it's a huge problem that you and her stans think it's appropriate to behave like this, and demand things and shows just how badly the lines have been blurred.


This event even about mental health and being concerned about those rights if it were you all would go lobby your politicians. This is about some weird cult-like worship of a celebrity that you all think is infallible and delusions of it goign back to 2001 with Britney touring the globe.

You keep saying “you all” as if everyone here is a huge Britney fan or involved in this movement, which isn’t true. But those things aren’t necessary in order to be appalled by her treatment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want the 90 minutes back I wasted watching this garbage

It's like that Quanon junk

You sound intelligent.

[Anonymous]

So I read somewhere that prior to her father becoming the conservator, Britney had been in debt. Under her father’s watch, her net worth went up to $60M.

This documentary, while interesting, really only shows one side of the story. I feel bad for Britney, but I also feel like her father has her in the best interest.

[Anonymous]

Is it typical for a non-celebrity to be forced into a conservatorship if they have mental issues?

If so, I have never heard of it....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is it typical for a non-celebrity to be forced into a conservatorship if they have mental issues?

If so, I have never heard of it....

We have a family friend in his 30s who is severely mentally ill. I believe he's currently under the guardianship of his parents. I don't think it's termed a conservatorship because he has no assets. When his parents die, they are going to leave money to support him. He will have both a guardian and a conservator, one to help him with daily life and one to manage the financial aspects.