US coronavirus cases top 10,000 and on the same or worse curve than Italy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting.....

Population density.

Mass transit.

MO only had 16 deaths??? Wow

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting.....

Population density.

Mass transit.

MO only had 16 deaths??? Wow

Missouri has 661 deaths.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting.....

Population density.

Mass transit.

MO only had 16 deaths??? Wow

Missouri has 661 deaths.

Sorry, didn't look at the date.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting.....

Population density.

Mass transit.

MO only had 16 deaths??? Wow

Missouri has 661 deaths.

The idiot who created that chart confused Missouri (MO) with Montana (MT)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting.....

Population density.

Mass transit.

MO only had 16 deaths??? Wow

Missouri has 661 deaths.

Sorry, didn't look at the date.

Oh, never mind, I need some coffee.

The number for MO is wrong, I didn't check the others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting.....

Population density.

Mass transit.

Poor leadership given population density and mass transit.

[Anonymous]

Even with MO/MT switch up, difference is startling

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting.....

Population density.

Mass transit.

Poor leadership given population density and mass transit.

And under your leadership public transportation would be eradicated, major cities would be evacuated, and forced displacement would be enacted to spread folks out throughout the country.
Yeah, you go ahead and run for office on that brilliant platform and let's see which you get more of - votes or mental health worker coming to put you in a straight jacket.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even with MO/MT switch up, difference is startling

What else is inaccurate - population size?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even with MO/MT switch up, difference is startling

What else is inaccurate - population size?

If you look at deaths per capita the red states aren't doing very well. Many are sparsely populated, unlike the blue states.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even with MO/MT switch up, difference is startling

What else is inaccurate - population size?

If you look at deaths per capita the red states aren't doing very well. Many are sparsely populated, unlike the blue states.

Depends what you mean per capita. There's many per capita. It's like per capita relative to what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even with MO/MT switch up, difference is startling

What else is inaccurate - population size?

If you look at deaths per capita the red states aren't doing very well. Many are sparsely populated, unlike the blue states.

You know, when you say "per capita,” there’s many per capitas. It’s, like, per capita relative to what?

[Anonymous]

A sample of what Trump did so woefully wrong

We are at 100,000 deaths in 2 months and that is with social distancing and shutting things down. Given the likelihood a vaccine is a year away, and that things are "opening up," it is highly likely the US will be well over 500,000 deaths and closer to a millon before a vaccine is available.

Enjoy the salon!

[Anonymous]

We will have a vaccine by the end of the year. Don't get your panties in a wad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even with MO/MT switch up, difference is startling

What else is inaccurate - population size?

If you look at deaths per capita the red states aren't doing very well. Many are sparsely populated, unlike the blue states.

Depends what you mean per capita. There's many per capita. It's like per capita relative to what?

These are awesome. Thank you.