US coronavirus cases top 10,000 and on the same or worse curve than Italy

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


The plan will be presented and implemented on January 20.

Until then, we'll just get more and more cases.
Anonymous
I guess having 100's of thousands of people coming to your state for a motorcycle rally wasn't such a good idea during a pandemic.



And 1 in every 1500 people in South Dakota is currently hospitalized with Covid. If we had the same in the DC metroplex, assuming a population of 6 million, we'd have 4,000 people in the hospital with Covid.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I guess having 100's of thousands of people coming to your state for a motorcycle rally wasn't such a good idea during a pandemic.



And 1 in every 1500 people in South Dakota is currently hospitalized with Covid. If we had the same in the DC metroplex, assuming a population of 6 million, we'd have 4,000 people in the hospital with Covid.


What's going to happen? People in that part of the country hate masks and being told what to do. What's going to happen is a lot of people will die in December.
Anonymous
140,000 new cases today.

Many states are at or bordering on hospital full occupancy. Unlike NYC in the spring, there aren't the resources to fly back-up practitioners from other parts of the country.

Trump's America.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:140,000 new cases today.

Many states are at or bordering on hospital full occupancy. Unlike NYC in the spring, there aren't the resources to fly back-up practitioners from other parts of the country.

Trump's America.



Oh well. F them.
Anonymous
The U.S. death toll from the coronavirus has topped 500,000.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The U.S. death toll from the coronavirus has topped 500,000.


It is what it is.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The U.S. death toll from the coronavirus has topped 500,000.


It is what it is.


This can't be quoted often enough:

“When you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that’s a pretty good job we’ve done.”
Anonymous
Trump's rallies fueled the epidemic. It is why we had to shut down again in November.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The U.S. death toll from the coronavirus has topped 500,000.


It is what it is.


This can't be quoted often enough:

“When you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that’s a pretty good job we’ve done.”


On March 21, on this thread, I predicted we could have 650,000 deaths. I was answered with:

"You are wrong. In three months this will look like one of the biggest hype jobs ever. Do more research."

It would be funny if it weren't so tragic.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The U.S. death toll from the coronavirus has topped 500,000.


It is what it is.


This can't be quoted often enough:

“When you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that’s a pretty good job we’ve done.”


On March 21, on this thread, I predicted we could have 650,000 deaths. I was answered with:

"You are wrong. In three months this will look like one of the biggest hype jobs ever. Do more research."

It would be funny if it weren't so tragic.



What does this even mean? I'm so tired of arrogant idiots.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The U.S. death toll from the coronavirus has topped 500,000.


It is what it is.


This can't be quoted often enough:

“When you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that’s a pretty good job we’ve done.”


On March 21, on this thread, I predicted we could have 650,000 deaths. I was answered with:

"You are wrong. In three months this will look like one of the biggest hype jobs ever. Do more research."

It would be funny if it weren't so tragic.



What does this even mean? I'm so tired of arrogant idiots.


“Do your research” means consume more rightwing propaganda and conspiracy theories.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I can always be wrong, but I provided my research and analysis to you, and all you did was say, "you are wrong, do more research." Umm, no. You do your own research and analysis. Well see who is right in a few months. But I'm pretty sure I'm right because it's just math now. Hell, I'll tell you how many dead people we'll have in two weeks. About 6,000. Don't believe me now. But if I'm right, will you believe you might, just might, be wrong.


Lol. Bookmarked.

2/21/21; 23:00...quoting this for you. The "Lol. Bookmarked" is what makes this so tragic.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The U.S. death toll from the coronavirus has topped 500,000.


It is what it is.


This can't be quoted often enough:

“When you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that’s a pretty good job we’ve done.”


On March 21, on this thread, I predicted we could have 650,000 deaths. I was answered with:

"You are wrong. In three months this will look like one of the biggest hype jobs ever. Do more research."

It would be funny if it weren't so tragic.



What does this even mean? I'm so tired of arrogant idiots.

I believe she was referring to how I looked at some data, made a few reasonable assumptions, did a little math and came up with an answer she didn't like.
Anonymous
Is there a legal way for the American people to hold Trump accountable for killing thousands of people? Or is he protected by absolute immunity?

If we can't do anything in the US, could we do something in an international court? Crimes against humanity?

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/538400-lancet-report-faults-trump-for-avoidable-coronavirus-deaths
A report in the British medical journal The Lancet blames former President Trump for an error-filled response to the coronavirus pandemic that it says contributed to 40 percent more deaths compared to other wealthy countries.

post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: