Barr and Durham

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Igor Danchenko has been arrested

For ... something.

We'll find out more soon, I guess. Interesting how Durham is so interested in discouraging anyone from communicating with the FBI about political issues. Are we supposed to learn our lesson?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Igor Danchenko has been arrested

For ... something.

We'll find out more soon, I guess. Interesting how Durham is so interested in discouraging anyone from communicating with the FBI about political issues. Are we supposed to learn our lesson?

Combined with the Sussman indictment, looks to be related to the Steele Dossier.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Igor Danchenko has been arrested

For ... something.

We'll find out more soon, I guess. Interesting how Durham is so interested in discouraging anyone from communicating with the FBI about political issues. Are we supposed to learn our lesson?

Combined with the Sussman indictment, looks to be related to the Steele Dossier.

Yeah, but the Sussman indictment was BS in order to slip in pontification about poor Trump. Is this charge going to be any better?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Igor Danchenko has been arrested

For ... something.

We'll find out more soon, I guess. Interesting how Durham is so interested in discouraging anyone from communicating with the FBI about political issues. Are we supposed to learn our lesson?

Combined with the Sussman indictment, looks to be related to the Steele Dossier.

Yeah, but the Sussman indictment was BS in order to slip in pontification about poor Trump. Is this charge going to be any better?

Keep telling yourself that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Igor Danchenko has been arrested

For ... something.

We'll find out more soon, I guess. Interesting how Durham is so interested in discouraging anyone from communicating with the FBI about political issues. Are we supposed to learn our lesson?

Combined with the Sussman indictment, looks to be related to the Steele Dossier.

Yeah, but the Sussman indictment was BS in order to slip in pontification about poor Trump. Is this charge going to be any better?

Keep telling yourself that.

Oh, you didn't read the indictment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Sussman indictment mischaracterizes the computer researchers' findings. The NY Times wrote an article on this a few weeks ago and now the researchers' lawyer has formally put it in a letter to DOJ.

But Mr. Durham used a 27-page indictment to lay out a far more expansive tale, one in which four computer scientists who were not charged in the case “exploited” their access to internet data to develop an explosive theory about cyberconnections in 2016 between Donald J. Trump’s company and a Kremlin-linked bank — a theory, he insinuated, they did not really believe....

At the same time, defense lawyers for the scientists say it is Mr. Durham’s indictment that is misleading. Their clients, they say, believed their hypothesis was a plausible explanation for the odd data they had uncovered — and still do.

The Alfa Bank results “have been validated and are reproducible. The findings of the researchers were true then and remain true today; reports that these findings were innocuous or a hoax are simply wrong,” said Jody Westby and Mark Rasch, lawyers for David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist and one of the researchers whom the indictment discussed but did not name.

Steven A. Tyrrell, a lawyer for Rodney Joffe, an internet entrepreneur and another of the four data experts, said his client had a duty to share the information with the F.B.I. and that the indictment “gratuitously presents an incomplete and misleading picture” of his role.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/politics/trump-alfa-bank-indictment.html

I still want to know what was going back and forth between those servers. Let’s be honest, the chance of it being something benign is approaching zero.

Yeah - i don't buy that it was just innocuous hits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Why does Durham keep charging these process crimes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Igor Danchenko has been arrested

For ... something.

We'll find out more soon, I guess. Interesting how Durham is so interested in discouraging anyone from communicating with the FBI about political issues. Are we supposed to learn our lesson?

Combined with the Sussman indictment, looks to be related to the Steele Dossier.

Yeah, but the Sussman indictment was BS in order to slip in pontification about poor Trump. Is this charge going to be any better?

Keep telling yourself that.

Oh, you didn't read the indictment.

I did. It’s damning for the FBI

[Anonymous]

LOL.

No, it is damning for Durham, who is 100% playing politics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Why does Durham keep charging these process crimes?

I honestly can't tell from the summary in the tweet what is being alleged here. The first count doesn't specify that the statement was made to the FBI or any federal agent. The other 4 have such a convoluted explanation I can't even tell what DOJ is alleging was the false statement - that Dachenko knew the identity of the caller but told the FBI he didn't or that Dacbenko told the FBI what the anon caller told him and that information was untrue - or something else altogether.

When you need a flow chart to charge what's probably the most straightforward crime on the books, it doesn't make your case look very strong.

[Anonymous]

Tell me again……which candidate colluded with Russia?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Igor Danchenko has been arrested

For ... something.

We'll find out more soon, I guess. Interesting how Durham is so interested in discouraging anyone from communicating with the FBI about political issues. Are we supposed to learn our lesson?

Combined with the Sussman indictment, looks to be related to the Steele Dossier.

Yeah, but the Sussman indictment was BS in order to slip in pontification about poor Trump. Is this charge going to be any better?

Keep telling yourself that.

Oh, you didn't read the indictment.

I did. It’s damning for the FBI

Not sure how it is damning to the FBI. The idea that the FBI has no idea that Sussman worked for the law firm representing Hillary and, therefore, may have been biased is NIL.

[Anonymous]

Here’s a good description by Turley:

https://jonathanturley.org/2021/11/04/igor-danchenko-arrested-as-part-of-durham-investigation/

[Anonymous]

Turley is absolutely the wrong person to be following on this.

This whole thing is going to blow up for Durham and Horowtitz.

the GOP was front facing many of the elements of this, pointing the RBI at targeted individuals - all subterfuge away from Trump's open treason.