Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I take it the Fox interview didn’t change any of our minds (in either direction)?

I’ve been anti-Brett the whole way but I I’m a little less so after watching.

I look forward to hearing Dr. Ford on Thursday.


The opposite. I believe Professor Ford but very once in a while have some doubts. But seeing Kavanaugh lying his way through an interview, he definitely did all that he was accused of.


Where are you getting that he "lied his way through" the interview? It really doesn't matter what he said - you presume guilt no matter what.


Yes, I can't imagine he's going to be coaching his daughters' teams anymore, that is for sure. I think the longer they stick this out the more chances that he will get impeached too. You can't have this kind of background and be a judge. Maybe something else, but not a judge.

What are some of you smoking? He's going to get confirmed and people are going to be groveling before him very soon.
Anonymous
I’m sorry, but the NYTimes digging through the guy’s yearbook in search of “misogynist” attitudes is getting a bit silly and will provoke a backlash in his favor.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ford's lawyers protest proposed Senate Judiciary plan to have an experienced sex crimes prosecutor do the questioning on Thursday. They are asking for the prosecutor's identity but assume seem to know hired prosecutor is a female as they ask to meet with her tomorrow. Letter re-iterates the complaint that White House hasn't asked the FBI to investigate.

https://twitter.com/frankthorp/status/1044392822496002049/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1044392822496002049&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fonline%2Fhearing-in-doubt-christine-fords-lawyer-rips-senate-plan-to-have-prosecutor-ask-questions-not-fair-and-respectful%2F


Laying the groundwork for a noisy withdrawal from the hearing maybe.

If that prosecutor questions Ford, Bromwich should question Kavanaugh.


What is a Bromwich?


Read links, people. Bromwich is one of Ford’s lawyers.


Your link does not say that.

Really?


It does not identify him as a lawyer in the signature block.

Who else would be communicating on behalf of ford to the judiciary committee?


Again, the letter does not say that. You are asking us to draw an inference. You should have just said that initially.



You clearly haven’t been keeping up with this. Michael Bromwich is Andy McCabe’s lawyer and just left his firm to represent Ford. This was covered extensively in the last thread. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_R._Bromwich


That’s nice, eyeroller, but the claim was that the link established that. It did not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They already signed. Why keep commenting?

Um, the facts on the ground have changed?

The only thing that's changed is your level of crazed desperation. Good luck with that!

The crazed desperation today was from Mitch McConnell with his “NOT ONE STEP BACK” speech.


And what a HORRIBLE fox news interview. He just about sunk whatever is left of the ship on that one. It will live in infamy, long after he’s flipping burgers. His wife looked at him with sheer loathing. It’s over.


When your husband is defending himself by hyping up his longstandibg virginity, a lot of thoughts have got to be running through your head. Who am I, why am I here,



That’s pretty much the look, yup. Beam me up, or whatever. Probably going over, in her mind, the merits of the hundreds of other GOP gents she could have married instead.
Anonymous
Justices serve during “good behavior,” according to the Constitution. If he is confirmed, I doubt he will be impeached over alleged bad behavior from many years ago. It would have to be something that happens after he is confirmed, or something *really* bad from the past with clear, indisputable evidence.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, but the NYTimes digging through the guy’s yearbook in search of “misogynist” attitudes is getting a bit silly and will provoke a backlash in his favor.


It’s weird, prudish, and ever so slightly probative. Gen X women went through a lot of crap that the privileged millennial women will only have to read about.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I take it the Fox interview didn’t change any of our minds (in either direction)?

I’ve been anti-Brett the whole way but I I’m a little less so after watching.

I look forward to hearing Dr. Ford on Thursday.


The opposite. I believe Professor Ford but very once in a while have some doubts. But seeing Kavanaugh lying his way through an interview, he definitely did all that he was accused of.


Where are you getting that he "lied his way through" the interview? It really doesn't matter what he said - you presume guilt no matter what.


+1 People like the PP want to have any reason for him to not be confirmed and feel justified in describing him in ways to fit their political agenda.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, but the NYTimes digging through the guy’s yearbook in search of “misogynist” attitudes is getting a bit silly and will provoke a backlash in his favor.


beyond silly and what's next? middle school yearbooks? are we going to comb through women's sexual pasts when they're nominated for an office?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This story about the woman Kavanaugh and his buddies slut-shaming a woman in their HS yearbook is disgusting. And it also shows that Kavanaugh is willing to lie about little things - like why he put her name on his yearbook memories page - which means he's willing to lie about the big things. It also shows all that claptrap about always respecting women in the interview tonight was BS.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/business/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-renate.html



I wanted to support President Trump's nominee but this Renate story combined with the interview tonight make me think he's a liar. I sympathize with the girl named in the yearbook.

When I was in 11th grade at a coed Catholic school I gave a ride home to a freshman after a club meeting. Yearbook, newspaper, drama, Children of Mary: I don't recall which club. His nickname was J.D. and if I had my yearbook I'd give his last name. He told other boys in the freshman class that I had sex with him on the hood of my red VW. In November. He was new that year and his parents were divorced and he lived in a crappy house. I did him a favor giving him a ride. Guys told me about it pretty quickly but it was devastating. This yearbook story completely reminded me of it. I retained my reputation because his story was so stupid and he was so pathetic. But it hurt.

I though Kavanaugh was lying on FOX. His wife was giving him the side eye the whole time. It was a terrible camera set up. It seemed they were trying to set her up. He didn't let his wife answer a question either. Can't they find a judge who is not so skeevy?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ford's lawyers protest proposed Senate Judiciary plan to have an experienced sex crimes prosecutor do the questioning on Thursday. They are asking for the prosecutor's identity but assume seem to know hired prosecutor is a female as they ask to meet with her tomorrow. Letter re-iterates the complaint that White House hasn't asked the FBI to investigate.

https://twitter.com/frankthorp/status/1044392822496002049/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1044392822496002049&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fonline%2Fhearing-in-doubt-christine-fords-lawyer-rips-senate-plan-to-have-prosecutor-ask-questions-not-fair-and-respectful%2F


Laying the groundwork for a noisy withdrawal from the hearing maybe.

If that prosecutor questions Ford, Bromwich should question Kavanaugh.


What is a Bromwich?


Read links, people. Bromwich is one of Ford’s lawyers.


Your link does not say that.

Really?


It does not identify him as a lawyer in the signature block.

Who else would be communicating on behalf of ford to the judiciary committee?


Again, the letter does not say that. You are asking us to draw an inference. You should have just said that initially.



You clearly haven’t been keeping up with this. Michael Bromwich is Andy McCabe’s lawyer and just left his firm to represent Ford. This was covered extensively in the last thread. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_R._Bromwich


That’s nice, eyeroller, but the claim was that the link established that. It did not.

I apologize for thinking that someone participating in this thread and seeing a) a reference to someone cross-examining Kavanaugh and b) seeing an obvious communication from that person on behalf of Ford to the Judiciary Committee might think that was one of Ford’s lawyers, as has been mentioned in the coverage of this story. Apparently I thought too much of you.
Anonymous
Tonight‘s interview was the nail in the coffin for me. If you want to give him the benefit of the doubt that he did not harrass/abuse, was virginal, did not drink to blackout excess, was just joking around about the stuff in the yearbook and in his fraternity, go ahead. But to deny knowledge of others doing such things - that’s one lie too many.

His wife said that she’s known him for 18 years and that it’s “hard to believe.” Pretty tepid. Of course this happened many years before they met. She was seven. (The 10 year age difference between them is especially striking when you think about high schools of the early 80s versus the early 90s.)

His “Ask the moms” line and the multiple awkward references to the 65 women who stood up for him at a “moment’s notice” (including Renate) - yikes. He comes off as both having developed this line of defense for years and yet not being able to deliver it at the moment of truth.

But much of this country, and moreso the vast majority of those in power in Republican Washington, are so not woke, who knows... he’ll probably still be confirmed by weeks end.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This story about the woman Kavanaugh and his buddies slut-shaming a woman in their HS yearbook is disgusting. And it also shows that Kavanaugh is willing to lie about little things - like why he put her name on his yearbook memories page - which means he's willing to lie about the big things. It also shows all that claptrap about always respecting women in the interview tonight was BS.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/business/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-renate.html



I wanted to support President Trump's nominee but this Renate story combined with the interview tonight make me think he's a liar. I sympathize with the girl named in the yearbook.

When I was in 11th grade at a coed Catholic school I gave a ride home to a freshman after a club meeting. Yearbook, newspaper, drama, Children of Mary: I don't recall which club. His nickname was J.D. and if I had my yearbook I'd give his last name. He told other boys in the freshman class that I had sex with him on the hood of my red VW. In November. He was new that year and his parents were divorced and he lived in a crappy house. I did him a favor giving him a ride. Guys told me about it pretty quickly but it was devastating. This yearbook story completely reminded me of it. I retained my reputation because his story was so stupid and he was so pathetic. But it hurt.

I though Kavanaugh was lying on FOX. His wife was giving him the side eye the whole time. It was a terrible camera set up. It seemed they were trying to set her up. He didn't let his wife answer a question either. Can't they find a judge who is not so skeevy?


So, you want Kavanaugh to be Borked because a high school boy made up a story about sleeping with you?

This makes sense.
Anonymous
Mark Judge has been in hiding at a buddy’s house in Bethany with “piles of rumpled clothes and boxes of Superman comics in his car.”
https://twitter.com/gabriel_pogrund/status/1044402691991056384?s=21
Anonymous
It’s actually incredibly appropriate for Kavanaugh to be “Borked” since both he and Bork think Presidents are above the law.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote: Tonight‘s interview was the nail in the coffin for me. If you want to give him the benefit of the doubt that he did not harrass/abuse, was virginal, did not drink to blackout excess, was just joking around about the stuff in the yearbook and in his fraternity, go ahead. But to deny knowledge of others doing such things - that’s one lie too many.

His wife said that she’s known him for 18 years and that it’s “hard to believe.” Pretty tepid. Of course this happened many years before they met. She was seven. (The 10 year age difference between them is especially striking when you think about high schools of the early 80s versus the early 90s.)

His “Ask the moms” line and the multiple awkward references to the 65 women who stood up for him at a “moment’s notice” (including Renate) - yikes. He comes off as both having developed this line of defense for years and yet not being able to deliver it at the moment of truth.

But much of this country, and moreso the vast majority of those in power in Republican Washington, are so not woke, who knows... he’ll probably still be confirmed by weeks end.




She appeared nervous and near tears, as would anyone who loves her husband and can't believe the horrible accusations. When she said "hard to believe," I think she meant all the accusations and how he's being treated are hard to believe. Didn't seem tepid to me. She's not an actress or news anchor.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: