Greendland - why not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

The NYPD could conquer Greenland with a few overtime shifts.

But they will not be fighting Greenlanders, so what then.

They won't be fighting anyone. Europe is not going to do anything. They will be completely wrecked if they attack any Americans sent to secure Greenland.

US military is way out numbered in Europe. Europe could easily wreck the US economy with sanction and the 12 trillion in US securities they have. Plus they could impose sanctions against Israel. How quickly will you maga type fold when Israel is in trouble?

Do you even realize what you just wrote? We have nearly 100K military personnel literally occupying Europe already. And you think it's a boast that they're "outnumbered" in the countries we are occupying? There is no conceivable timeline where the EU attempts military action against the United States for securing Greenland as part of America.

Do you realize that there are 1.5 million active duty European troops? That is excluding US troops. How many reservists do you think there are?

Defending Greenland would be as unpopular in Europe as attacking it would be in the US. But if push came to shove, the US could achieve air superiority in Greenland in about a day, and European troops would have no choice but to retreat off the island. It’s nice to think about the EU “resisting”, but it’s tough to resist against Tomahawk missles and F-35s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

The NYPD could conquer Greenland with a few overtime shifts.

But they will not be fighting Greenlanders, so what then.

They won't be fighting anyone. Europe is not going to do anything. They will be completely wrecked if they attack any Americans sent to secure Greenland.

Greenland is already secure. What you are describing is an invasion of America troops who were not invited nor wanted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

The NYPD could conquer Greenland with a few overtime shifts.

But they will not be fighting Greenlanders, so what then.

They won't be fighting anyone. Europe is not going to do anything. They will be completely wrecked if they attack any Americans sent to secure Greenland.

US military is way out numbered in Europe. Europe could easily wreck the US economy with sanction and the 12 trillion in US securities they have. Plus they could impose sanctions against Israel. How quickly will you maga type fold when Israel is in trouble?

Do you even realize what you just wrote? We have nearly 100K military personnel literally occupying Europe already. And you think it's a boast that they're "outnumbered" in the countries we are occupying? There is no conceivable timeline where the EU attempts military action against the United States for securing Greenland as part of America.

100k people who have been living in EU communities for years. Do you think those people are going to gleefully start attacking the countries that have been their homes? The soldiers they've done joint exercomplaining. For an extremely unpopular action.

You're clearly cosplaying and have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

No one is talking about "attacking" Europe. The U.S. will secure Greenland (in North America) and it will become a territory of the Unites States. The EU will not dare to use military force against the United States, despite how "outnumbered" the U.S. troops occupying Europe are; the EU won't even politely ask the U.S. military to leave Europe (the EU doesn't want the U.S. military to leave, they want the U.S. military there). You people talk in circles and cannot make a coherent argument.

Stephen, go back to the white house and placate your boss.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

The NYPD could conquer Greenland with a few overtime shifts.

But they will not be fighting Greenlanders, so what then.

They won't be fighting anyone. Europe is not going to do anything. They will be completely wrecked if they attack any Americans sent to secure Greenland.

US military is way out numbered in Europe. Europe could easily wreck the US economy with sanction and the 12 trillion in US securities they have. Plus they could impose sanctions against Israel. How quickly will you maga type fold when Israel is in trouble?

Do you even realize what you just wrote? We have nearly 100K military personnel literally occupying Europe already. And you think it's a boast that they're "outnumbered" in the countries we are occupying? There is no conceivable timeline where the EU attempts military action against the United States for securing Greenland as part of America.

Do you realize that there are 1.5 million active duty European troops? That is excluding US troops. How many reservists do you think there are?

Defending Greenland would be as unpopular in Europe as attacking it would be in the US. But if push came to shove, the US could achieve air superiority in Greenland in about a day, and European troops would have no choice but to retreat off the island. It’s nice to think about the EU “resisting”, but it’s tough to resist against Tomahawk missles and F-35s.

and if this happen, US citizens will no longer be welcome in the EU, NATO dissolved and we would stand on the precipice of a global war with nuclear parties on both sides. the US will lose its largest trading partners in Europe, Canada and Mexico, bringing the US economy to a standstill.

[Anonymous]

Macron - Trump please, think of the brown people we can bomb together!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

The NYPD could conquer Greenland with a few overtime shifts.

But they will not be fighting Greenlanders, so what then.

They won't be fighting anyone. Europe is not going to do anything. They will be completely wrecked if they attack any Americans sent to secure Greenland.

US military is way out numbered in Europe. Europe could easily wreck the US economy with sanction and the 12 trillion in US securities they have. Plus they could impose sanctions against Israel. How quickly will you maga type fold when Israel is in trouble?

Do you even realize what you just wrote? We have nearly 100K military personnel literally occupying Europe already. And you think it's a boast that they're "outnumbered" in the countries we are occupying? There is no conceivable timeline where the EU attempts military action against the United States for securing Greenland as part of America.

100k people who have been living in EU communities for years. Do you think those people are going to gleefully start attacking the countries that have been their homes? The soldiers they've done joint exercomplaining. For an extremely unpopular action.

You're clearly cosplaying and have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

No one is talking about "attacking" Europe. The U.S. will secure Greenland (in North America) and it will become a territory of the Unites States. The EU will not dare to use military force against the United States, despite how "outnumbered" the U.S. troops occupying Europe are; the EU won't even politely ask the U.S. military to leave Europe (the EU doesn't want the U.S. military to leave, they want the U.S. military there). You people talk in circles and cannot make a coherent argument.

Stephen, go back to the white house and placate your boss.

lol, I read the last line quickly as “felate your boss” but I guess they mean the same thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

The NYPD could conquer Greenland with a few overtime shifts.

But they will not be fighting Greenlanders, so what then.

They won't be fighting anyone. Europe is not going to do anything. They will be completely wrecked if they attack any Americans sent to secure Greenland.

US military is way out numbered in Europe. Europe could easily wreck the US economy with sanction and the 12 trillion in US securities they have. Plus they could impose sanctions against Israel. How quickly will you maga type fold when Israel is in trouble?

Do you even realize what you just wrote? We have nearly 100K military personnel literally occupying Europe already. And you think it's a boast that they're "outnumbered" in the countries we are occupying? There is no conceivable timeline where the EU attempts military action against the United States for securing Greenland as part of America.

Do you realize that there are 1.5 million active duty European troops? That is excluding US troops. How many reservists do you think there are?

Defending Greenland would be as unpopular in Europe as attacking it would be in the US. But if push came to shove, the US could achieve air superiority in Greenland in about a day, and European troops would have no choice but to retreat off the island. It’s nice to think about the EU “resisting”, but it’s tough to resist against Tomahawk missles and F-35s.

BAE might have an F-35 kill switch embedded in the software.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

The NYPD could conquer Greenland with a few overtime shifts.

But they will not be fighting Greenlanders, so what then.

They won't be fighting anyone. Europe is not going to do anything. They will be completely wrecked if they attack any Americans sent to secure Greenland.

US military is way out numbered in Europe. Europe could easily wreck the US economy with sanction and the 12 trillion in US securities they have. Plus they could impose sanctions against Israel. How quickly will you maga type fold when Israel is in trouble?

Do you even realize what you just wrote? We have nearly 100K military personnel literally occupying Europe already. And you think it's a boast that they're "outnumbered" in the countries we are occupying? There is no conceivable timeline where the EU attempts military action against the United States for securing Greenland as part of America.

100k people who have been living in EU communities for years. Do you think those people are going to gleefully start attacking the countries that have been their homes? The soldiers they've done joint exercomplaining. For an extremely unpopular action.

You're clearly cosplaying and have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

No one is talking about "attacking" Europe. The U.S. will secure Greenland (in North America) and it will become a territory of the Unites States. The EU will not dare to use military force against the United States, despite how "outnumbered" the U.S. troops occupying Europe are; the EU won't even politely ask the U.S. military to leave Europe (the EU doesn't want the U.S. military to leave, they want the U.S. military there). You people talk in circles and cannot make a coherent argument.

Stephen, go back to the white house and placate your boss.

Europe knows it can withstand hardship and prevail. The US does not have that experience. Just imagine the absolute chaos within the US when European holders of US debt and equity dump a combined 11 trillion. And do you think China and Russia will stand idly by while the US is wracked by paroxysms of economic upheaval? No. they will contribute to the dumping.

[Anonymous]

Trump amplifies post that says NATO — not China or Russia — is part of the “real threat” to America.

https://bsky.app/profile/kyledcheney.bsky.social/post/3mcukmk55th2r


It is 1984, and the shift amongst who our friends are and who we are at war with is about to shift.

I am eagerly awaiting MAGA spouting off about how Russia has always been our friend and we are at war with Europe and always have been.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

The NYPD could conquer Greenland with a few overtime shifts.

But they will not be fighting Greenlanders, so what then.

They won't be fighting anyone. Europe is not going to do anything. They will be completely wrecked if they attack any Americans sent to secure Greenland.

US military is way out numbered in Europe. Europe could easily wreck the US economy with sanction and the 12 trillion in US securities they have. Plus they could impose sanctions against Israel. How quickly will you maga type fold when Israel is in trouble?

Do you even realize what you just wrote? We have nearly 100K military personnel literally occupying Europe already. And you think it's a boast that they're "outnumbered" in the countries we are occupying? There is no conceivable timeline where the EU attempts military action against the United States for securing Greenland as part of America.

Do you realize that there are 1.5 million active duty European troops? That is excluding US troops. How many reservists do you think there are?

Defending Greenland would be as unpopular in Europe as attacking it would be in the US. But if push came to shove, the US could achieve air superiority in Greenland in about a day, and European troops would have no choice but to retreat off the island. It’s nice to think about the EU “resisting”, but it’s tough to resist against Tomahawk missles and F-35s.

Sure, but that's a military hypothetical that's almost irrelevant. If we're using Tomahawks and F-35's against NATO/Europe, then planting a flag over Greenland is going to the FAR AND AWAY LEAST of our worries.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

The NYPD could conquer Greenland with a few overtime shifts.

But they will not be fighting Greenlanders, so what then.

They won't be fighting anyone. Europe is not going to do anything. They will be completely wrecked if they attack any Americans sent to secure Greenland.

US military is way out numbered in Europe. Europe could easily wreck the US economy with sanction and the 12 trillion in US securities they have. Plus they could impose sanctions against Israel. How quickly will you maga type fold when Israel is in trouble?

Do you even realize what you just wrote? We have nearly 100K military personnel literally occupying Europe already. And you think it's a boast that they're "outnumbered" in the countries we are occupying? There is no conceivable timeline where the EU attempts military action against the United States for securing Greenland as part of America.

Do you realize that there are 1.5 million active duty European troops? That is excluding US troops. How many reservists do you think there are?

Defending Greenland would be as unpopular in Europe as attacking it would be in the US. But if push came to shove, the US could achieve air superiority in Greenland in about a day, and European troops would have no choice but to retreat off the island. It’s nice to think about the EU “resisting”, but it’s tough to resist against Tomahawk missles and F-35s.

and if this happen, US citizens will no longer be welcome in the EU, NATO dissolved and we would stand on the precipice of a global war with nuclear parties on both sides. the US will lose its largest trading partners in Europe, Canada and Mexico, bringing the US economy to a standstill.

Nuclear war over Greenland? No.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

The NYPD could conquer Greenland with a few overtime shifts.

But they will not be fighting Greenlanders, so what then.

They won't be fighting anyone. Europe is not going to do anything. They will be completely wrecked if they attack any Americans sent to secure Greenland.

They are treaty bound to defend Greenland. What kind of a fantasy world do you live in? China is laughing.

oh, my bad. There's a treaty huh? Surely the EU will attempt to use military force against the U.S. because there's a treaty with some words on paper. lol. lmao even.

How old are you? Guessing that you had no relatives who fought and died in WWII. You may have no historical understanding of the world order, but Europeans do, even if their relatives who fought in that war are no longer with us.

Not sure what your point is in invoking WW2. The U.S. military stepped in an saved the UK/France/etc's bacon in WW1 and again in WW2. Do you actually think the EU is going to use military force against the U.S. when we secure Greenland as part of of America? If anything, they should be happy to give it to the United States to secure as a key strategic location in the accelerating geopolitical Arctic game.

Look at the ICBM path of potential missiles from Russia or China to the United States and you'll see why we need to control Greenland as a vital part of American security in the 21st Century.

Yes they will fight. Especially when the US military rolls out of the US military base in Greenland killing UK, French, Denmark, etc soldiers and civilians. If you see the US use a military base in an allied country to invade and take over that country what do you think Nato will do? You think the European couldn’t take back European US bases by force? The 100,000 US troops would not stand a chance and the US will lose all the pre positioned equipment in Europe and bases around the world.

If you take Greenland you now have Canada as an enemy state. How are you going to track ICBM without Canada? How are you going to track the Russian nuclear submarines’ missiles? The US does not even have an icebreaker fleet needed to deploy in arctic.

The Soviet Union won the war against Germany in ww2. The US invade Italy in September 1943. By that time the Soviets had beaten the Germans in Stalingrad by February of 1943 and destroyed the Germans at Kursk in July of 1943. By August the German military had about 3.8 million troops on the eastern front. The Soviets had 12 million plus and growing with superior equipment and production.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

The NYPD could conquer Greenland with a few overtime shifts.

But they will not be fighting Greenlanders, so what then.

They won't be fighting anyone. Europe is not going to do anything. They will be completely wrecked if they attack any Americans sent to secure Greenland.

US military is way out numbered in Europe. Europe could easily wreck the US economy with sanction and the 12 trillion in US securities they have. Plus they could impose sanctions against Israel. How quickly will you maga type fold when Israel is in trouble?

Do you even realize what you just wrote? We have nearly 100K military personnel literally occupying Europe already. And you think it's a boast that they're "outnumbered" in the countries we are occupying? There is no conceivable timeline where the EU attempts military action against the United States for securing Greenland as part of America.

Do you realize that there are 1.5 million active duty European troops? That is excluding US troops. How many reservists do you think there are?

Defending Greenland would be as unpopular in Europe as attacking it would be in the US. But if push came to shove, the US could achieve air superiority in Greenland in about a day, and European troops would have no choice but to retreat off the island. It’s nice to think about the EU “resisting”, but it’s tough to resist against Tomahawk missles and F-35s.

and if this happen, US citizens will no longer be welcome in the EU, NATO dissolved and we would stand on the precipice of a global war with nuclear parties on both sides. the US will lose its largest trading partners in Europe, Canada and Mexico, bringing the US economy to a standstill.

It will definitely devastate our economy. MAGA somehow do not care about our economy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

The NYPD could conquer Greenland with a few overtime shifts.

But they will not be fighting Greenlanders, so what then.

They won't be fighting anyone. Europe is not going to do anything. They will be completely wrecked if they attack any Americans sent to secure Greenland.

They are treaty bound to defend Greenland. What kind of a fantasy world do you live in? China is laughing.

oh, my bad. There's a treaty huh? Surely the EU will attempt to use military force against the U.S. because there's a treaty with some words on paper. lol. lmao even.

How old are you? Guessing that you had no relatives who fought and died in WWII. You may have no historical understanding of the world order, but Europeans do, even if their relatives who fought in that war are no longer with us.

Not sure what your point is in invoking WW2. The U.S. military stepped in an saved the UK/France/etc's bacon in WW1 and again in WW2. Do you actually think the EU is going to use military force against the U.S. when we secure Greenland as part of of America? If anything, they should be happy to give it to the United States to secure as a key strategic location in the accelerating geopolitical Arctic game.

Look at the ICBM path of potential missiles from Russia or China to the United States and you'll see why we need to control Greenland as a vital part of American security in the 21st Century.

Yes they will fight. Especially when the US military rolls out of the US military base in Greenland killing UK, French, Denmark, etc soldiers and civilians. If you see the US use a military base in an allied country to invade and take over that country what do you think Nato will do? You think the European couldn’t take back European US bases by force? The 100,000 US troops would not stand a chance and the US will lose all the pre positioned equipment in Europe and bases around the world.

If you take Greenland you now have Canada as an enemy state. How are you going to track ICBM without Canada? How are you going to track the Russian nuclear submarines’ missiles? The US does not even have an icebreaker fleet needed to deploy in arctic.

The Soviet Union won the war against Germany in ww2. The US invade Italy in September 1943. By that time the Soviets had beaten the Germans in Stalingrad by February of 1943 and destroyed the Germans at Kursk in July of 1943. By August the German military had about 3.8 million troops on the eastern front. The Soviets had 12 million plus and growing with superior equipment and production.

If the US tries to use force, it will be WWIII and the US will be the odd man out.