Greendland - why not?

[Anonymous]

Maybe Netherlands should invade the U.S. virgin Islands? I mean, they can provide better healthcare and public assistance. And the population of those islands is small. So why not? And while we are at it, why not have Belgium retake the Congo?

[Anonymous]

Only a moron sh*ts on a stable world order. We had all these rules and diplomacy because of the World Wars. Guess folks don’t remember their high school history classes anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What if Denmark wanted to take over Puerto Rico? Should we just let them?

Sure. Why not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What if Denmark wanted to take over Puerto Rico? Should we just let them?

Sure. Why not?

Not PP, but agree it’s kind of a decent trade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What if Denmark wanted to take over Puerto Rico? Should we just let them?

Sure. Why not?

Not PP, but agree it’s kind of a decent trade.

Who said trade? What if they just took it?

[Anonymous]

What's wrong with the idea of me stealing your car. It cannot be negative for the very small population in there, and could be positive for them. As for me many many benefits. So, setting aside the rhetoric, what's wrong

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Only a moron sh*ts on a stable world order. We had all these rules and diplomacy because of the World Wars. Guess folks don’t remember their high school history classes anymore.

+1 there was clearly no benefit to WWII. All it didn’t was kill millions and destroy Europe. All of this expansionist tough guy stuff is a waste.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What's wrong with the idea of me stealing your car. It cannot be negative for the very small population in there, and could be positive for them. As for me many many benefits. So, setting aside the rhetoric, what's wrong

If they really wanted to be part of the US they could, they don’t want to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Setting aside how he has gone about it, what's wrong with the idea of Greenland joining the US. It cannot be negative for the very small population over there, and could be positive for them. As for the US many many benefits. So, setting aside the rhetoric, what's wrong?

Name 1 benefit for Greenland.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Learn to spell Greenland Vlad. Plus there’s already a thread on this topic

Are you sure this isn't Mrs. Miller

Well, she doesn’t have a reputation for being particularly bright, so sure…it could be her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Only a moron sh*ts on a stable world order. We had all these rules and diplomacy because of the World Wars. Guess folks don’t remember their high school history classes anymore.

Trump’s kids and his billionaire bro kids won’t fight in WWIII. It will be the tax paying masses who will pay with their money and their kids’ lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What if Denmark wanted to take over Puerto Rico? Should we just let them?

Sure. Why not?

Not PP, but agree it’s kind of a decent trade.

Who said trade? What if they just took it?

Yeh right, because the Danish are known for projecting power. Moscow is only 1500mi away. They’re worried about their flank, as they should be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What if Denmark wanted to take over Puerto Rico? Should we just let them?

Sure. Why not?

Not PP, but agree it’s kind of a decent trade.

Who said trade? What if they just took it?

Puerto Ricans would probably welcome it.

[Anonymous]

Greenland has universal health care, they are EU citizens, and they are allowed to attend University in Denmark for free. Why would they want to leave?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Greenland has universal health care, they are EU citizens, and they are allowed to attend University in Denmark for free. Why would they want to leave?

Can Greenland annex the US instead?