This is a blue state bug (for now at least)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden Administration recommendeing 3rd shots within 8 months of 2nd shots as a booster.

I wonder if any of the vaccine hesitant will change their minds on this?

Probably not. They will just retort - “I guess the vaccine doesn’t work after all!” - and be amused with their supposed cleverness. Dunning Kruger on full display without a shred of shame.

Well, we know the vaccines don’t prevent nor do they stop transmission. So they can be classified as therapeutics. Which is perfectly fine. At this point though, there are other therapeutics that we need to liberally use (not ban) that have long histories of safety.

You don’t appear to understand what therapeutic means.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

So we won't take a proven vaccine, but we will take bovine worm medicine.

American 2021.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Of course it was Tucker Carlson/Fox news. I should have known.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden Administration recommendeing 3rd shots within 8 months of 2nd shots as a booster.

I wonder if any of the vaccine hesitant will change their minds on this?

Probably not. They will just retort - “I guess the vaccine doesn’t work after all!” - and be amused with their supposed cleverness. Dunning Kruger on full display without a shred of shame.

Well, we know the vaccines don’t prevent nor do they stop transmission. So they can be classified as therapeutics. Which is perfectly fine. At this point though, there are other therapeutics that we need to liberally use (not ban) that have long histories of safety.

You don’t appear to understand what therapeutic means.

Ah, the leftist “you don’t understand what x means” comment. This is right up there with “what are your sources” and “sure, Jan”.

DP. Seriously, you don't know what therapeutic means. Please google the definition.

There are plenty of stories circulating about unvaccinated people begging for the vaccine as they're about to be intubated, only to be told that it's too late. You have to take it before you get sick because IT IS NOT A TREATMENT once you're already sick.

[Anonymous]

Someone at the FDA has a sense of humor. Love it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Someone at the FDA has a sense of humor. Love it.

I actually don't think that's funny. It's really sad that some people are that stupid.

[Anonymous]

I mean, I wonder how many of the horse deworming people are going "It'S ExPeRiMeNtAl!" about the vaccine. Or, are thinking they'll hit up and number of other experimental treatments should they fall too seriously ill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Someone at the FDA has a sense of humor. Love it.

I actually don't think that's funny. It's really sad that some people are that stupid.

PP who posted it. I agree with you, but everything we know about how to effectively persuade people who are deeply wedded to misinformation suggests that arguing using a bunch of facts and science will only make them defensive and push them further into their position. Maybe a little bit of cheeky humor will disarm them enough to get the message across. At this point, whatever works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So we won't take a proven vaccine, but we will take bovine worm medicine.

American 2021.

They read that it also works on sheep.

[Anonymous]

Darwin effect. shrug.

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile in Mississippi...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile in Mississippi...

The tweet is gone? What did it say?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile in Mississippi...

I think I know (looked up her account). She had to retract another tweet about Florida. Clearly she’s uniformed.

[Anonymous]

DP. Here's links to peer reviewed studies relating to mask wearing:

https://www.kxan.com/news/coronavirus/do-face-masks-work-here-are-49-scientific-studies-that-explain-why-they-do/

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8