Senate Democrats sending secret letter about Kavanaugh to FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Sounds lime she's alrwady been hurt. And if she makes her identity known, she will get hurt even more. Look what happened to Roy Moore's victims. What hurts women is being sexually assaulted, then being told to shut up about it. Anyways, she's lawyered up, so she isn't completely anonymous.


No, what hurts women is not reporting assault immediately after it happens, so as to have the best possible opportunity to see justice served. What hurts women are those women who decide to stay silent for years (30+??) and then expect that no one will have any difficulty taking them seriously.

You are comparing these accusations to those against Roy Moore?

Here's a clue: one of these things is not like the other.

True - at least the Roy Moore accusers had the guts to go public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An anonymous accusation is not the same as credible. You get that, right?

FBI rolls eyes, says whatever and tucks claim away in a folder. Done.

Now, time to vote.

Exactly. Why would they bother? They probably receive anonymous tips all the time, most of which are hoaxes.

Yes but for those of us who knew all the parties involved, it ain't no hoax.

Doesn't really matter. Unless the accuser goes public, all of this is moot. Especially your wild speculations and innuendo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she said "no" and he did not stop then it is attempted rape or rape. She said no so why should she be sullied?

And if she said "no" and he DID stop, then there's no problem. He deferred to her wishes. Unless the liberals are now claiming he raped someone. Is that the latest?

Yet she said he and his friend turned up the music so people couldn’t hear her protests, and she had to “escape.”

So the idea that she said no and he complied is not among the strong possibilities of what actually happened.

Well, that's one side of this story. The anonymous side. And he says it's absolutely untrue. Why do you believe someone anonymous, someone who may not even be real? Oh, wait - because it's supposedly a woman? Typical.
-a woman

Because Kavanaugh is already a proven liar - about his finances, about his activities in the Bush Administration and when he testified previously before the Senate.

Left wing narrative debunked by several actual legal scholars... even by Vox.

Yep. But don't try arguing facts here. We're in the land o' nutters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Sounds lime she's alrwady been hurt. And if she makes her identity known, she will get hurt even more. Look what happened to Roy Moore's victims. What hurts women is being sexually assaulted, then being told to shut up about it. Anyways, she's lawyered up, so she isn't completely anonymous.


No, what hurts women is not reporting assault immediately after it happens, so as to have the best possible opportunity to see justice served. What hurts women are those women who decide to stay silent for years (30+??) and then expect that no one will have any difficulty taking them seriously.

You are comparing these accusations to those against Roy Moore?

Here's a clue: one of these things is not like the other.

And here's another clue: One of these things *is* lime the other. And it's not a good thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People. Get real. If this happened in high school as described, this girl would not have kept quiet about it. I don't mean she would have pressed charges, but, certainly, other girls would have known about it.

But, even so, even if she thinks she is telling the truth, it just doesn't sound logical. She escaped from two high school boys? Kind of hard to believe. If it is not made of whole cloth, the gal is likely twisting the story.

I've literally been in this position. Yes, you can escape if you fight and don't freeze (a lot of women do to no fault of their own).

I find the deflection telling. There are many women in this story who know these schools and these types of parties in the DC area. And I am more than happy to give you the initial of my field hockey coach at our well known private to verify my bona fides.

I've also been to that Georgetown townhouse. It was a cigar smoke filled sh!t show. But I was an idiot and 20, fwiw. Luckily, I didn't get raped (though guys tried).

Don't you understand that none of these personal anecdotes matter? None of it. What matters is whether there actually is a person behind this anonymous accusation, and if so, what happened during the alleged incident. Those of you chiming in with your breathless stories of being at drunken parties are completely irrelevant.

So are 65 high school "friends" who claim Brett was a nice boy.

At least they're talking about Kavanaugh, and not some random encounter with random people years before or after Kavanaugh was even in high school. That you can't tell the difference is not surprising though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My phone's blowing up. Why did Mark Judge delete his Youtube channel?

https://twitter.com/search?q=mark%20judge%20youtube&src=typd

Because it was homemade videos of young women, some who looked <18, dressed in midriff baring cutoffs and bikinis. The couple of videos I watched were the camera slowly panning up from the pelvic area to their face so we could watch them seductively eat an oyster.

Not the guy Bart, I mean Brett, wants as his alibi witness.

I suspect girls will come out of the woodwork re Judge. And then Kavanaugh.

You can get the gist of Mark Judge's videos here - https://twitter.com/TheDiscomfiture/status/1041055221684862978

This thread is about Brett Kavanaugh - not Mark Judge. Try and keep up.

They're buddies, and Mark was allegedly in the room when the incident occurred. And he was a crazy party animal in HS by his own admission. And he's a bit of a sex obsessed pervert as an adult based on his social media presence. So...

So... what? That tells us nothing about the accusation in question. Do you generally decide someone's guilt or innocence based on who they were friends with in high school, or at any time in their lives? If so, I hope you're never on a jury.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Vote scheduled for Thursday.
Still time for more chicanery on the part of the left.

+1
And I'm sure they'll take full advantage of the days remaining.

[Anonymous]

Liberals seem to have difficulty with the concept of innocent until proven guilty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My phone's blowing up. Why did Mark Judge delete his Youtube channel?

https://twitter.com/search?q=mark%20judge%20youtube&src=typd

Because it was homemade videos of young women, some who looked <18, dressed in midriff baring cutoffs and bikinis. The couple of videos I watched were the camera slowly panning up from the pelvic area to their face so we could watch them seductively eat an oyster.

Not the guy Bart, I mean Brett, wants as his alibi witness.

I suspect girls will come out of the woodwork re Judge. And then Kavanaugh.

You can get the gist of Mark Judge's videos here - https://twitter.com/TheDiscomfiture/status/1041055221684862978

This thread is about Brett Kavanaugh - not Mark Judge. Try and keep up.

They're buddies, and Mark was allegedly in the room when the incident occurred. And he was a crazy party animal in HS by his own admission. And he's a bit of a sex obsessed pervert as an adult based on his social media presence. So...

So... what? That tells us nothing about the accusation in question. Do you generally decide someone's guilt or innocence based on who they were friends with in high school, or at any time in their lives? If so, I hope you're never on a jury.

So you're saying that letter with 65 women vouching for Kavamaugh's upstanding character tells us nothing about the accusation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[vimeo]k

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An anonymous accusation is not the same as credible. You get that, right?

FBI rolls eyes, says whatever and tucks claim away in a folder. Done.

Now, time to vote.

Absolutely. The Democrats cannot be rewarded for pulling eleventh hour dirty moves like this. They need to learn this kind of crap will not be tolerated. Take the vote as scheduled.

Pot meet Kettle.

BTW what is in those 100k documents concerning Kavanaugh the GOP withheld from the American people?? Shenanigans? Look in the mirror!!

The “American people” are not clamoring or even interested in those 100k documents. Only a bunch of desperate nut jobs who have lost all credibility care.

This. The American people would like this disgusting witch hunt to end and confirmation of a good man to begin.

Actually only about a third of the people feel that way.

Either include sources with your posts, or stop throwing out lies. Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is definitely a very real person, nice try though.

For all their bluster about liberal desperation, conservatives are having some serious trouble with this whole concept, aren’t they? I’m a know nothing from nowhere near DC (and when I lived there, I was equally a know no one in particular), but this woman’s claims sound completely credible. It actually sounds very, very similar to my sister’s rape, separated by about twenty years and 2000 miles.

Cons on this thread have suggested that the actions described sound totally normal (what kind of aberrant sexual deviancy did they get up to in high school that this sounds like normal sex?)

They’ve insulted the victim. They’ve insulted Feinstein. They’ve insulted anyone who supports sexual assault victims. They've insulted the Democrats in general. They’re just kind of spraying insults everywhere but in the one place it should be sprayed: on their garbage president and his horrible nominee. If you’re still friends with her, please tell her I am saying a prayer for her tonight for her safety, her bravery and her continued courage, as well as the other victims when they come forward.

You are such a poseur. Give us all a break. You're actually jumping right over any investigation into the presumption of guilt. Do you even know how the legal system works? Someone is not guilty because you say he is. I'm always going to support sexual assault victims. Right now, we don't have one. We have a one-sided, anonymous account that you liberals are eating up, and why? Because you're desperately hoping that smearing Kavanaugh's name prevents him from confirmation. No evidence, no witnesses, nothing at all. Yet you're insisting this actually happened - because you desperately hope it did happen.

I didn't think liberals could get much more disgusting, but you guys surprise me each and every day. I certainly hope no one accuses your husband or sons of sexual assault - with no evidence whatsoever - and then goes on to tell anyone who will listen that you're married to a rapist. That might just ruin your lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[vimeo]k

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An anonymous accusation is not the same as credible. You get that, right?

FBI rolls eyes, says whatever and tucks claim away in a folder. Done.

Now, time to vote.

Absolutely. The Democrats cannot be rewarded for pulling eleventh hour dirty moves like this. They need to learn this kind of crap will not be tolerated. Take the vote as scheduled.

Pot meet Kettle.

BTW what is in those 100k documents concerning Kavanaugh the GOP withheld from the American people?? Shenanigans? Look in the mirror!!

The “American people” are not clamoring or even interested in those 100k documents. Only a bunch of desperate nut jobs who have lost all credibility care.

This. The American people would like this disgusting witch hunt to end and confirmation of a good man to begin.

Actually only about a third of the people feel that way.

A quarter.

The latest poll shows Americans are divided equally on whether to confirm him. If you have anything more recent, please do share. But you don't.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/11/politics/poll-kavanaugh/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My phone's blowing up. Why did Mark Judge delete his Youtube channel?

https://twitter.com/search?q=mark%20judge%20youtube&src=typd

Because it was homemade videos of young women, some who looked <18, dressed in midriff baring cutoffs and bikinis. The couple of videos I watched were the camera slowly panning up from the pelvic area to their face so we could watch them seductively eat an oyster.

Not the guy Bart, I mean Brett, wants as his alibi witness.

I suspect girls will come out of the woodwork re Judge. And then Kavanaugh.

You can get the gist of Mark Judge's videos here - https://twitter.com/TheDiscomfiture/status/1041055221684862978

This thread is about Brett Kavanaugh - not Mark Judge. Try and keep up.

They're buddies, and Mark was allegedly in the room when the incident occurred. And he was a crazy party animal in HS by his own admission. And he's a bit of a sex obsessed pervert as an adult based on his social media presence. So...

So... what? That tells us nothing about the accusation in question. Do you generally decide someone's guilt or innocence based on who they were friends with in high school, or at any time in their lives? If so, I hope you're never on a jury.

So you're saying that letter with 65 women vouching for Kavamaugh's upstanding character tells us nothing about the accusation?

That letter doesn't speak to the anonymous accusation, no. It speaks to his good character, however. There's actually nothing that speaks to the accusation. Which is why the whole thing is a farce.

[Anonymous]

It’s not anonymous if the accuser is known to the FBI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[vimeo]k

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An anonymous accusation is not the same as credible. You get that, right?

FBI rolls eyes, says whatever and tucks claim away in a folder. Done.

Now, time to vote.

Absolutely. The Democrats cannot be rewarded for pulling eleventh hour dirty moves like this. They need to learn this kind of crap will not be tolerated. Take the vote as scheduled.

Pot meet Kettle.

BTW what is in those 100k documents concerning Kavanaugh the GOP withheld from the American people?? Shenanigans? Look in the mirror!!

The “American people” are not clamoring or even interested in those 100k documents. Only a bunch of desperate nut jobs who have lost all credibility care.

This. The American people would like this disgusting witch hunt to end and confirmation of a good man to begin.

Actually only about a third of the people feel that way.

A quarter.

The latest poll shows Americans are divided equally on whether to confirm him. If you have anything more recent, please do share. But you don't.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/11/politics/poll-kavanaugh/index.html

It quite clearly says only about a third support him.