2010G BSC Coming For FVU

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BSC 2010s are the best team in this area. FVU needed to add players from SYC and Brave over the last several years to be relevant. Do not disguise an improvement in talent and in results as some sort of hard work and development. You added better players, and your team did better. Funny how that works. Now you are crying because another team used your playbook and added players, which everyone knows is the only reason that this Mclean/FVU team got better. Now your team will be lucky to finish in the top 5 of a weak age group in the MA.

The roster size complaints are funny as well as all of FVU high school teams are over 18 players except for 2010, and if the fvu players did not leave would be in the mid 20's. VDA also has 20+ players at every High school age group. VDA also has 29 players on one team. Let's discuss those roster sizes as well. Clearly some very upset FVU adults. Look on the bright side, you will save money this year, with no trip to the west coast in July.

BSC finished 5th in NA and didn’t get out of the group in San Diego. Does that make them the top team in the area?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:23 players on roster and two of them are recovering from ACL So 21 players for a U16 girls ECNL roster to start the year. Most teams have a few injuries in these HS teams so it seems like a reasonable roster size. VDA has 20 listed; is that a huge roster?

23 is ridiculous. Multiple girls who won't play at all. Yes there might be a couple injuries but it's basically 2 full teams.

The inside scoop is it's actually more than 23.
And if FVU's roster is now much lighter (it was to begin anyway) sounds like full playing minutes will be possible there. It's a key recruiting year and the goal is not to win games, but to actually be seen playing!

So… who to reach out to if you want a look from this team?

The head coach? CW

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:23 players on roster and two of them are recovering from ACL So 21 players for a U16 girls ECNL roster to start the year. Most teams have a few injuries in these HS teams so it seems like a reasonable roster size. VDA has 20 listed; is that a huge roster?

23 is ridiculous. Multiple girls who won't play at all. Yes there might be a couple injuries but it's basically 2 full teams.

The inside scoop is it's actually more than 23.
And if FVU's roster is now much lighter (it was to begin anyway) sounds like full playing minutes will be possible there. It's a key recruiting year and the goal is not to win games, but to actually be seen playing!

So… who to reach out to if you want a look from this team?

The head coach? CW

Is he the head coach of that team? I can’t tell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BSC 2010s are the best team in this area. FVU needed to add players from SYC and Brave over the last several years to be relevant. Do not disguise an improvement in talent and in results as some sort of hard work and development. You added better players, and your team did better. Funny how that works. Now you are crying because another team used your playbook and added players, which everyone knows is the only reason that this Mclean/FVU team got better. Now your team will be lucky to finish in the top 5 of a weak age group in the MA.

The roster size complaints are funny as well as all of FVU high school teams are over 18 players except for 2010, and if the fvu players did not leave would be in the mid 20's. VDA also has 20+ players at every High school age group. VDA also has 29 players on one team. Let's discuss those roster sizes as well. Clearly some very upset FVU adults. Look on the bright side, you will save money this year, with no trip to the west coast in July.

BSC finished 5th in NA and didn’t get out of the group in San Diego. Does that make them the top team in the area?

Yes, you can lose a couple of games and still be the best team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BSC 2010s are the best team in this area. FVU needed to add players from SYC and Brave over the last several years to be relevant. Do not disguise an improvement in talent and in results as some sort of hard work and development. You added better players, and your team did better. Funny how that works. Now you are crying because another team used your playbook and added players, which everyone knows is the only reason that this Mclean/FVU team got better. Now your team will be lucky to finish in the top 5 of a weak age group in the MA.

The roster size complaints are funny as well as all of FVU high school teams are over 18 players except for 2010, and if the fvu players did not leave would be in the mid 20's. VDA also has 20+ players at every High school age group. VDA also has 29 players on one team. Let's discuss those roster sizes as well. Clearly some very upset FVU adults. Look on the bright side, you will save money this year, with no trip to the west coast in July.

BSC finished 5th in NA and didn’t get out of the group in San Diego. Does that make them the top team in the area?

Yes, you can lose a couple of games and still be the best team.

If BSC was so good then why are they bringing several players from FVU. Where are BSC last year players or why aren’t they returning? What’s going on?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BSC 2010s are the best team in this area. FVU needed to add players from SYC and Brave over the last several years to be relevant. Do not disguise an improvement in talent and in results as some sort of hard work and development. You added better players, and your team did better. Funny how that works. Now you are crying because another team used your playbook and added players, which everyone knows is the only reason that this Mclean/FVU team got better. Now your team will be lucky to finish in the top 5 of a weak age group in the MA.

The roster size complaints are funny as well as all of FVU high school teams are over 18 players except for 2010, and if the fvu players did not leave would be in the mid 20's. VDA also has 20+ players at every High school age group. VDA also has 29 players on one team. Let's discuss those roster sizes as well. Clearly some very upset FVU adults. Look on the bright side, you will save money this year, with no trip to the west coast in July.

BSC finished 5th in NA and didn’t get out of the group in San Diego. Does that make them the top team in the area?

Yes, you can lose a couple of games and still be the best team.

Place 5th and still be the best?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BSC 2010s are the best team in this area. FVU needed to add players from SYC and Brave over the last several years to be relevant. Do not disguise an improvement in talent and in results as some sort of hard work and development. You added better players, and your team did better. Funny how that works. Now you are crying because another team used your playbook and added players, which everyone knows is the only reason that this Mclean/FVU team got better. Now your team will be lucky to finish in the top 5 of a weak age group in the MA.

The roster size complaints are funny as well as all of FVU high school teams are over 18 players except for 2010, and if the fvu players did not leave would be in the mid 20's. VDA also has 20+ players at every High school age group. VDA also has 29 players on one team. Let's discuss those roster sizes as well. Clearly some very upset FVU adults. Look on the bright side, you will save money this year, with no trip to the west coast in July.

BSC finished 5th in NA and didn’t get out of the group in San Diego. Does that make them the top team in the area?

Yes, you can lose a couple of games and still be the best team.

Place 5th and still be the best?

Ummm, they didn’t play to win regular season games. They won North Atlantic Cup and got automatic entry before the league even started. That meant KL could play bench much more during league games, which was the right thing to do.

Also, they almost made it out of group play. If you use that reasoning, I guess VDA 09s suck too (VDA did not win Mid Atlantic Cup).

Oh, why wouldn’t you take Union players if they are better than some starters or bench players??????

Moving on from the lame argument. Bethesda and FVU used to be the best teams, now it is just Bethesda…if the egos can coexist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:23 players on roster and two of them are recovering from ACL So 21 players for a U16 girls ECNL roster to start the year. Most teams have a few injuries in these HS teams so it seems like a reasonable roster size. VDA has 20 listed; is that a huge roster?

23 is ridiculous. Multiple girls who won't play at all. Yes there might be a couple injuries but it's basically 2 full teams.

The inside scoop is it's actually more than 23.
And if FVU's roster is now much lighter (it was to begin anyway) sounds like full playing minutes will be possible there. It's a key recruiting year and the goal is not to win games, but to actually be seen playing!

So… who to reach out to if you want a look from this team?

The head coach? CW

Is he the head coach of that team? I can’t tell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:23 players on roster and two of them are recovering from ACL So 21 players for a U16 girls ECNL roster to start the year. Most teams have a few injuries in these HS teams so it seems like a reasonable roster size. VDA has 20 listed; is that a huge roster?

23 is ridiculous. Multiple girls who won't play at all. Yes there might be a couple injuries but it's basically 2 full teams.

The inside scoop is it's actually more than 23.
And if FVU's roster is now much lighter (it was to begin anyway) sounds like full playing minutes will be possible there. It's a key recruiting year and the goal is not to win games, but to actually be seen playing!

So… who to reach out to if you want a look from this team?

The head coach? CW

Is he the head coach of that team? I can’t tell.

Hmmm you must not be on the team sadly? If you were you'd know he is absolutely the coach and a great, respected coach too!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BSC 2010s are the best team in this area. FVU needed to add players from SYC and Brave over the last several years to be relevant. Do not disguise an improvement in talent and in results as some sort of hard work and development. You added better players, and your team did better. Funny how that works. Now you are crying because another team used your playbook and added players, which everyone knows is the only reason that this Mclean/FVU team got better. Now your team will be lucky to finish in the top 5 of a weak age group in the MA.

The roster size complaints are funny as well as all of FVU high school teams are over 18 players except for 2010, and if the fvu players did not leave would be in the mid 20's. VDA also has 20+ players at every High school age group. VDA also has 29 players on one team. Let's discuss those roster sizes as well. Clearly some very upset FVU adults. Look on the bright side, you will save money this year, with no trip to the west coast in July.

BSC finished 5th in NA and didn’t get out of the group in San Diego. Does that make them the top team in the area?

Yes, you can lose a couple of games and still be the best team.

Place 5th and still be the best?

Ummm, they didn’t play to win regular season games. They won North Atlantic Cup and got automatic entry before the league even started. That meant KL could play bench much more during league games, which was the right thing to do.

Also, they almost made it out of group play. If you use that reasoning, I guess VDA 09s suck too (VDA did not win Mid Atlantic Cup).

Oh, why wouldn’t you take Union players if they are better than some starters or bench players??????

Moving on from the lame argument. Bethesda and FVU used to be the best teams, now it is just Bethesda…if the egos can coexist.

So you're saying that BSC went into last season trying not to win? Wow!
Why do you keep bringing VDA into all this and keep putting them down? FVU players and families are not touting that they're the best even though they won the MA; they're well aware of the amazing players, teams and competition in the larger area from the likes of VDA, CSA and others in the MA. Everybody knows it was really close in the end and this will all surely change every year. Humility, respect, and kindness matter! Glad for those that remain at FVU and embrace this culture; no matter the wins, losses or position.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BSC 2010s are the best team in this area. FVU needed to add players from SYC and Brave over the last several years to be relevant. Do not disguise an improvement in talent and in results as some sort of hard work and development. You added better players, and your team did better. Funny how that works. Now you are crying because another team used your playbook and added players, which everyone knows is the only reason that this Mclean/FVU team got better. Now your team will be lucky to finish in the top 5 of a weak age group in the MA.

The roster size complaints are funny as well as all of FVU high school teams are over 18 players except for 2010, and if the fvu players did not leave would be in the mid 20's. VDA also has 20+ players at every High school age group. VDA also has 29 players on one team. Let's discuss those roster sizes as well. Clearly some very upset FVU adults. Look on the bright side, you will save money this year, with no trip to the west coast in July.

BSC finished 5th in NA and didn’t get out of the group in San Diego. Does that make them the top team in the area?

Yes, you can lose a couple of games and still be the best team.

Place 5th and still be the best?

Ummm, they didn’t play to win regular season games. They won North Atlantic Cup and got automatic entry before the league even started. That meant KL could play bench much more during league games, which was the right thing to do.

Also, they almost made it out of group play. If you use that reasoning, I guess VDA 09s suck too (VDA did not win Mid Atlantic Cup).

Oh, why wouldn’t you take Union players if they are better than some starters or bench players??????

Moving on from the lame argument. Bethesda and FVU used to be the best teams, now it is just Bethesda…if the egos can coexist.

VDA 09 won their league. BSC got 5th in their league. These are not the same.

FVU 2010 won their league and advanced to elite 8. VDA 2010 got second in their league and advanced to round of 16.

Bsc is the best around? Why because bsc parents said so? Because they were good at 13U with early developers?

[Anonymous]

So good at u13! The best damn team around in ….2023

[Anonymous]

I don’t see how many of you fail to recognize when you get an automatic playoff entry for winning NA Cup changes your approach for league play. It literally doesn’t matter. It’s called development and not win at all costs.

All of the other teams in the league had to do its best to make the playoffs and get wins. BSC did not.

Haters are going to hate, I get it but that doesn’t mean you can just ignore facts.

[Anonymous]

Triggered 😡

[Anonymous]

Ok I’m dying to know - how did the FVU 2010s do against the Arlington 2010s today? Score not posted in the ECNL app.