Hutchings needs to go (ACPS)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Westfall is immensely popular in the east end.

Is she? That's not what I see from the numbers on her social media accounts and lawn sign coverage.

I was interested in her campaign but by not responding publicly to his attacks on her outdoor lunch project (sorry but a safe, closed Facebook group post is NOT responding publicly), it tells me that she won't stand up to him if elected.

I get that Hutchings has a well documented history of seeking retribution in Alexandria and Shaker Heights & that is intimidating.

But after the constant family social media photo posts, over the top vendor promotion and rambling website, I'm no longer interested.

The only serious candidate I see in B is Simpson Baird. She is substantive, serious and strikes the right tone. It's a very big contrast.

Bridget Westfall is doer. Sure her website sucks and her social media doesn't have a ton of followers. But who was Dr. Hutchings talking about in the ALXNow article today? Westfall. She works at HHS. Think she might be busy with the refugees from Afghanistan, crisis at the border, COVID/Delta variant, and now the hurricanes? If you want to find out more information about Westfall, just ask her. I have messaged her on Facebook and emailed her campaign and she responded very quickly.

[Anonymous]

I think Ashley Simpson Baird is a strong candidate too. That doesn't mean I don't also like Bridget Westfall. They are two very different people. If you don't think Westfall is doing enough, why don't you help her? I can't imagine doing my actual job, having a family, and running for school board.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lots of wolves in sheep clothing here. Tells me people are scared of Westfall...

Snort. No one, absolutely no one is "scared" of Westfall. She is the silliest of the bunch. Other than a few of you here who keep posting repeatedly she doesn't have a constituent base at all. We're not voting for her. She can't put together a cogent and coherent platform to save her life. Look at her FB page and her responses in Q&A types of forums. She gives Mr. Bean a run for his money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of wolves in sheep clothing here. Tells me people are scared of Westfall...

Snort. No one, absolutely no one is "scared" of Westfall. She is the silliest of the bunch. Other than a few of you here who keep posting repeatedly she doesn't have a constituent base at all. We're not voting for her. She can't put together a cogent and coherent platform to save her life. Look at her FB page and her responses in Q&A types of forums. She gives Mr. Bean a run for his money.

Uh huh. Just wait.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of wolves in sheep clothing here. Tells me people are scared of Westfall...

Snort. No one, absolutely no one is "scared" of Westfall. She is the silliest of the bunch. Other than a few of you here who keep posting repeatedly she doesn't have a constituent base at all. We're not voting for her. She can't put together a cogent and coherent platform to save her life. Look at her FB page and her responses in Q&A types of forums. She gives Mr. Bean a run for his money.

Snort? Are you a pig?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Westfall is immensely popular in the east end.

Is she? That's not what I see from the numbers on her social media accounts and lawn sign coverage.

I was interested in her campaign but by not responding publicly to his attacks on her outdoor lunch project (sorry but a safe, closed Facebook group post is NOT responding publicly), it tells me that she won't stand up to him if elected.

I get that Hutchings has a well documented history of seeking retribution in Alexandria and Shaker Heights & that is intimidating.

But after the constant family social media photo posts, over the top vendor promotion and rambling website, I'm no longer interested.

The only serious candidate I see in B is Simpson Baird. She is substantive, serious and strikes the right tone. It's a very big contrast.

To be clear, she posted on the ACPS parent’s page. It’s some super secret page, it’s just closed to keep out trolls. Most involved parents are on it already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Westfall is immensely popular in the east end.

Is she? That's not what I see from the numbers on her social media accounts and lawn sign coverage.

I was interested in her campaign but by not responding publicly to his attacks on her outdoor lunch project (sorry but a safe, closed Facebook group post is NOT responding publicly), it tells me that she won't stand up to him if elected.

I get that Hutchings has a well documented history of seeking retribution in Alexandria and Shaker Heights & that is intimidating.

But after the constant family social media photo posts, over the top vendor promotion and rambling website, I'm no longer interested.

The only serious candidate I see in B is Simpson Baird. She is substantive, serious and strikes the right tone. It's a very big contrast.

To be clear, she posted on the ACPS parent’s page. It’s some super secret page, it’s just closed to keep out trolls. Most involved parents are on it already.

+1.

It's designed to keep out the trolls like the one you are addressing. These people have zero integrity. And despite their apparent comfort here, many of us know who they are and share their identities privately.

Next time your daughter or son doesn't make the cut during try outs, be absolutely clear that we are punishing you.

[Anonymous]

Westfall has a campaign FB page and has publicly posted remarks there related to the recent outdoor lunch effort. Not sure why people think she hasn’t put information out!

[Anonymous]

DO NOT VOTE FOR ISH BOYLE! Total right-wing anti-mask pro-Hutchings candidate. We can do better. We need to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DO NOT VOTE FOR ISH BOYLE! Total right-wing anti-mask pro-Hutchings candidate. We can do better. We need to.

This is just racist hate for white men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DO NOT VOTE FOR ISH BOYLE! Total right-wing anti-mask pro-Hutchings candidate. We can do better. We need to.

This is just racist hate for white men.

No man, he is nuts. His poor kids.

[Anonymous]

DO NOT VOTE FOR ISH BOYLE! Total right-wing anti-mask pro-Hutchings candidate. We can do better. We need to.



This is just racist hate for white men.


No man, he is nuts. His poor kids.

His anti-mask stance is appalling, and I am certainly NOT voting for him, but I don't think he is pro-Hutchings. Don't vote for him for the accurate reasons, not fabricated ones.

[Anonymous]

Not sure if Ish Boyle shares his wife's views, but her Twitter is extreme.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DO NOT VOTE FOR ISH BOYLE! Total right-wing anti-mask pro-Hutchings candidate. We can do better. We need to.

This is just racist hate for white men.

No man, he is nuts. His poor kids.

His anti-mask stance is appalling, and I am certainly NOT voting for him, but I don't think he is pro-Hutchings. Don't vote for him for the accurate reasons, not fabricated ones.

+1

[Anonymous]

Not sure if Ish Boyle shares his wife's views, but her Twitter is extreme.

What is the account name? Pre-Covid, my son played with their son a few times at a park (just happened to be there at the same time). The kid seemed nice, but that's not a statement on the parents either way.