Honestly, the loss of the previous principal probably had something to do with falling enrollment. However, the three biggest cohorts RCES ever had were the first 3 incoming K classes after it became a Blue Ribbon school. I think when people heard their neighborhood had a Blue Ribbon school, some of them who would have gone private decided to enroll their new K students at RCES. Then their younger children went there because their older child was there. Part of why I think this is that I’m a parent from the 2nd big cohort and 23 of the children in my child’s K class were firstborns. It’s now been enough years that those first three post-Blue Ribbon cohorts have all aged out and even some of their younger siblings are almost done with elementary school. A lot of the shrinking enrollment a couple years ago was due to fewer K students being enrolled several years in a row. I think that when the neighborhood conversation shifted from “Hey, we’ve got a BR school!” to “OMG, we’re at more than 150% capacity and we lost more playground because they had to add more portables!,” more new young families with their first rising K students went private. People who can afford private abandoning the neighborhood public school could be a possible explanation for falling test scores. |
+1 This. All of this. Kids are leaving in droves to private schools. Test scores have dropped dramatically. The numbers don't lie. And bear in mind given the size of the school, it only takes 2 to 3 kids per class to move to private to be noticeable overall. If every class loses 2.5 kids, that's almost 100 kids down overall. For those others at RCES, how many folks do you know that flipped to private over the last few years? Spin it all you want, but it's a really large number...and embarrassing that we pay so much for housing only to deal with a subpar school now. I hope it changes, I really do. But given the agenda and lack of leadership of the current administration, I just don't see it. |
What's your explanation for Matsunaga ES doing exactly the same thing? 2002: 808 2003: 986 2004: 1,043 2005: 1,152 2006: 924 2007: 877 2008: 948 2009: 1,015 2010: 1,025 2011: 1,036 2012: 1,009 2013: 958 2014: 919 2015: 856 2016: 794 2017: 770 2018: 728 2019: 710 |
I’m not all that concerned with them; that’s not my ES. Rather than engaging in whataboutism, how about you explain RCES? |
Sure, I definitely agree with you. There are a ton of other reasons we love living in this neighborhood (especially with the revitalization of Kentlands Market Square, it’s really an awesome place to live), but not being able to use the ES is a *major* downside. Not enough for us to move, but a major downside nonetheless. |
I’m a different poster and I posted at 19:42. |
The test scores haven't budged. The great schools ranking is based on more than test scores. Also the enrollment rose and falls with the age of property owners. The Lakelands was completed about 15 or so years ago. Couples moved in and had 2 or 3 kids. The youngest of those kids are now old enough to be out of elementary school and going to middle school. Its pretty simple but I'm sure people live to bash the black female principal and hold her responsible over the white male that left the position and THAT is why the area stinks. |
Enrollment peaked somewhere around 5 years ago. Lakelands is 20-21 years old. |
20:34 PP needs to stop making this about race.
Also, when it comes to the neighborhood aging: I don’t really believe that. On our block in Lakelands alone there are 5 families with young kids. DD is 4 and there are two kids almost exactly her age on our block. This isn’t unusual for the neighborhood. During the summer (pre-COVID), the streets were *filled* with kids. |
Also, Lakelands was built in the late 90s, not 15 years ago. Kentlands was built in the late 80s.
Homes in both neighborhoods sell. It’s not like the same owners who bought into these neighborhoods when they were built are all still here. Some are, but many are not. |
Yes, the projections were for the original owners to age and elementary enrollment to stabilize, but then it just kept increasing well past new homes being built in Lakelands. |
But the point no one seems to want to recognize is that, since RCES was built with Kentlands in mind (not Lakelands), as soon as Lakelands was built, RCES basically hit capacity. Add the non-Kentlands/Lakelands families and you have an over-enrolled school. |
That fits exactly. Assuming most couples have the second child 2-3 years after the first and most people don't. Ove the year they're pregnant. |
It's not whataboutism. How about you explain how you know that a bad principal is responsible for this phenomenon at Rachel Carson, rather than other, more obvious explanations for the same phenomenon at other schools, such as neighborhood turnover? |
Your subjective examples are pretty worthless. Neighborhood demographics age and renew in waves..thats just a fact |