|
I wish I could give my opinion but it will just be deleted because I can do research and think for myself...
Georgia, Colorado (Democrat!) and Texas |
|
Indiana is heading back to the fields.
https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/2020/05/11/reopening-amid-coronavirus-how-little-league-youth-sports-might-return/3107642001/ |
| I guess outside of the DMV bubble, people are getting on with life. https://www.wsbtv.com/news/trending/no-spit-ohio-sports-leagues-resume-coronavirus-forces-spitting-ban-no-high-fives/36KICIG7Q5BGPLUWHCUZEAPPB4/ |
|
NC canceled Spring but plans t hold tryouts in June (https://www.ncsoccer.org/news_article/show/1104032)
Utah sports are returning (https://www.ksl.com/article/46753474/what-does-utahs-move-to-yellow-phase-of-covid-19-response-mean-for-local-sports) US Youth Soccer (https://www.fysa.com/assets/56/6/usys_rta_notice_051320.pdf) Florida heading back (https://www.fysa.com/assets/56/6/returnplay_tryouts_5.7.201.pdf) |
| It will be back |
| College conferences playing this Fall. https://www.topdrawersoccer.com/college-soccer-articles/coronavirus-college-soccer-news-tracker_aid48068 |
| DMV planning an underground neighborhood soccer league where the different neighborhood kids play street soccer against each other. No age restrictions other than you have to be under 18. |
When/where? How do we get involved? |
| Seems like most places are returning, looks like the people on here hoping we don’t get back are going to be upset |
| Our club told us that they will require a small deposit but if hte season is delayed no payments will be charged until the season resumes. It seems like a reasonable approach, given the current uncertainty. |
I like this approach |
Most places will be back soon |
Ours did something similar with the payments, as well as noting all current players would be offered a spot on next season's roster and stating that there were some open spots on the roster for new players. Seemed reasonable... |
1. Have you seen the antibody test results from New York? Several weeks ago they were implying over 20% of people in New York City (and about 14% in New York state as a whole) had already been exposed to covid-19. These tests had very low rates of false positives and higher rates of false negatives so the actual rate of exposure was likely higher than this. Several more weeks have elapsed since then. 2. Confirmed cases are well known to be a small fraction of actual exposure for this, and every other, disease. Estimates vary but the broad range is 10x-50x. Most recent estimates, based on various studies, have concluded that 20-30x is what most countries see. Those countries doing much more testing than average obviously achieve lower multiples. 3. Most estimates (based on studies produced by scientists as opposed to articles written by journalists) for the infection fatality rate of covid are now between 0.2% and 0.4%, and the generally accepted way of estimating the percentage of the population that has been infected is to multiple the number of fatalities by about 300. In the case of New York that would imply about 8.25 million infections - which is about 40%. You could argue that, since New York opted for the "infect as many old people as you can by forcing nursing homes to take patients released from hospital while still infectious" strategy that they might have an apparent fatality rate rather above the average, and therefore suggest that maybe only 30% of the population has been exposed. I'm Ok with that. My point still applies. It would apply even at only 5%. 4. "Not everyone who had/ has COVID19 are able to test well for antibodies". So what? That doesn't give you license to assume that any random symptoms are attributable to covid-19 when there hasn't been a positive test. If you allow that, then you could claim anything and everything was caused by covid. Per your method, there is literally nothing that is not associated with covid. This is junk science. |
Note that there is nothing even remotely close to scientific proof that this disorder is in any way related to covid. Several children with these symptoms have not tested positive even for covid antibodies, let alone for the virus itself. And, even if they all tested positive for antibodies (they don't), that would be an interesting correlation well worth investigating further but still a long way from causation.
This is not strictly true. In areas where the a large proportion of the population has already been exposed, there may not be a surge. So some of the cities in the north east may not see a surge. And this is likely why Wuhan has not seen a surge either for example. However I do agree that anywhere where the virus has not reached at least 30%-40% of the population there will be a surge. And that certainly appears to include the DMV.
Or that you're willing to eat the deposit
|