I’m tired of smelling your pot everywhere

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amusing to me how if this were cigarette smoke odor instead of weed, everyone on this forum would be up in arms over it. But since it's pot smoke, the same people who would be outraged were it cigarettes, are totally fine with it.

The hypocrisy here is literally boundless.

Liberal logic

I'm liberal and I am against smoking pot. I assume many others who post that the smell is disgusting are also liberals. Liberals don't vote in lock step. You are a turd PP and your attitude is ruining our country.

You assume others are liberal? Because you are ?
And you know this ? Liberal wizard in action. Just because you are and people you may know doesn’t make the whoouniverse
Based on you.

Uh, the poster was claiming liberals voted in pot use and are now complaining about it. I was pointing out that not all liberals support pot use, by using myself as an example. Yes, I assume others are like me.

Keep up, PP. It's not that difficult.

[Anonymous]

So our pot smoking friends here:
- never knew that some get addicted
- think those smokers outside the metro and convention center every day are “occasional” smokers
- don’t get that posting on DCUM is a waste of time on that alleged 6-figure salary.

Stoned dumbasses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The public nature of it is still new enough to me that I get a kick out of it. I'm a bit of a rebel at heart, and it thrills me a little that all those other rebels out there are doing that out in the open.

Pot is way down the list of things I hate smelling. Cigarette smoke, cigar smoke, strong perfume, patchouli... all those things make me want to gag. Pot I can live with.

“Rebel” is a kind word for it. And I’m sure that some smokers are handling it well. But something like 10% of pot smokers are addicted, and they’re probably the ones getting that last desperate toke in the subway tunnel or spending all day hanging out on 7th Street.

LOL nobody gets addicted to marijuana, grandpa.

Weed makes you dumb.

A little weed makes you a little dumber. A lot of weed makes you a lot dumber.

I like always being the smartest person in the room. Although it's easier now than it used to be, because of people like you, PP.

It also makes you less of a tight-ass, which is something you desperately need.

If you can focus long enough, read this: https://www.cdc.gov/marijuana/faqs/marijuana-addiction.html

Cool. Occasional pot use hasn't stopped me from:

- Graduating in the top 9% of my class from a top 20 research university
- Graduating with honors from a top 10 research university for grad school
- Getting my dream job
- Being promoted 4 times in that job in the last 8 years

It's just made the ride a little more fun. Sorry you've missed out.

Imagine what you could have accomplished if you hadn't smoked pot.

DP. What the hell will occasional pot use do to make you less intelligent?

You realize that the bottle of wine you have every night is just as bad, if not worse, then taking a puff of the good stuff. Not to mention, you alcoholics are ruining your lovers and brain cells.


But yeah, carry on attacking the successful person who smokes a bit of weed here and there.

And if you didn’t want it in DC, why did you vote for it???

Maybe if you didn't get high, you wouldn't be dead certain that the poster you are chatting with on an anonymous forum drinks a bottle of wine a night (wrong) and is an alcoholic (wrong) who is ruining her brain cells (wrong) and her lover (maybe or maybe not; am I ruining my lover with alcohol or with love?). Also I don't live or vote in dc. But keep shouting at that person. I agree whoever she is, she deserves it.

If you don’t live or vote in DC, why do you give a shit??! LMAO

Go back to the Virginia suburbs of Arlington and stay there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So our pot smoking friends here:
- never knew that some get addicted
- think those smokers outside the metro and convention center every day are “occasional” smokers
- don’t get that posting on DCUM is a waste of time on that alleged 6-figure salary.

Stoned dumbasses.

Apparently our tight-ass non-pot smoking friends:

- Can't read because no one said that NO ONE gets addicted to pot. Just that most don't, which is true.

- Make massive assumptions about people they see smoking.

- Judge people for being on the exact same fking website they're on.

Illogical hypocrites.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amusing to me how if this were cigarette smoke odor instead of weed, everyone on this forum would be up in arms over it. But since it's pot smoke, the same people who would be outraged were it cigarettes, are totally fine with it.

The hypocrisy here is literally boundless.

Liberal logic

I'm liberal and I am against smoking pot. I assume many others who post that the smell is disgusting are also liberals. Liberals don't vote in lock step. You are a turd PP and your attitude is ruining our country.

You assume others are liberal? Because you are ?
And you know this ? Liberal wizard in action. Just because you are and people you may know doesn’t make the whoouniverse
Based on you.

Uh, the poster was claiming liberals voted in pot use and are now complaining about it. I was pointing out that not all liberals support pot use, by using myself as an example. Yes, I assume others are like me.

Keep up, PP. It's not that difficult.

+1. I’m OP and I’m liberal. I’m not against all pot use, just when I’m, say, riding metro to (my 6-figure, since it seems to matter) job in the morning.

This is not hard, get with the program.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I live just off of U Street, love the smell of weed -- and, yes, I'll smoke it in public. It's a great think. Tight asses!

+100

Going by the public smokers here, this isn’t exactly something to aspire to. You both seem like immature losers bragging about non-existent jobs.

Ha ha, you wish. I retired early and have $5 million in investments and live in a $1.5 million rowhome in Logan/U Street. I'm having the time of my life!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The public nature of it is still new enough to me that I get a kick out of it. I'm a bit of a rebel at heart, and it thrills me a little that all those other rebels out there are doing that out in the open.

Pot is way down the list of things I hate smelling. Cigarette smoke, cigar smoke, strong perfume, patchouli... all those things make me want to gag. Pot I can live with.

“Rebel” is a kind word for it. And I’m sure that some smokers are handling it well. But something like 10% of pot smokers are addicted, and they’re probably the ones getting that last desperate toke in the subway tunnel or spending all day hanging out on 7th Street.

LOL nobody gets addicted to marijuana, grandpa.

Weed makes you dumb.

A little weed makes you a little dumber. A lot of weed makes you a lot dumber.

I like always being the smartest person in the room. Although it's easier now than it used to be, because of people like you, PP.

It also makes you less of a tight-ass, which is something you desperately need.

If you can focus long enough, read this: https://www.cdc.gov/marijuana/faqs/marijuana-addiction.html

Cool. Occasional pot use hasn't stopped me from:

- Graduating in the top 9% of my class from a top 20 research university
- Graduating with honors from a top 10 research university for grad school
- Getting my dream job
- Being promoted 4 times in that job in the last 8 years

It's just made the ride a little more fun. Sorry you've missed out.

Imagine what you could have accomplished if you hadn't smoked pot.

DP. What the hell will occasional pot use do to make you less intelligent?

You realize that the bottle of wine you have every night is just as bad, if not worse, then taking a puff of the good stuff. Not to mention, you alcoholics are ruining your lovers and brain cells.


But yeah, carry on attacking the successful person who smokes a bit of weed here and there.

And if you didn’t want it in DC, why did you vote for it???

Maybe if you didn't get high, you wouldn't be dead certain that the poster you are chatting with on an anonymous forum drinks a bottle of wine a night (wrong) and is an alcoholic (wrong) who is ruining her brain cells (wrong) and her lover (maybe or maybe not; am I ruining my lover with alcohol or with love?). Also I don't live or vote in dc. But keep shouting at that person. I agree whoever she is, she deserves it.

If you don’t live or vote in DC, why do you give a shit??! LMAO

Go back to the Virginia suburbs of Arlington and stay there.

LOL, wrong again. You are a stoner laughing your ass off at a phantom. Typical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The public nature of it is still new enough to me that I get a kick out of it. I'm a bit of a rebel at heart, and it thrills me a little that all those other rebels out there are doing that out in the open.

Pot is way down the list of things I hate smelling. Cigarette smoke, cigar smoke, strong perfume, patchouli... all those things make me want to gag. Pot I can live with.

“Rebel” is a kind word for it. And I’m sure that some smokers are handling it well. But something like 10% of pot smokers are addicted, and they’re probably the ones getting that last desperate toke in the subway tunnel or spending all day hanging out on 7th Street.

LOL nobody gets addicted to marijuana, grandpa.

Weed makes you dumb.

A little weed makes you a little dumber. A lot of weed makes you a lot dumber.

I like always being the smartest person in the room. Although it's easier now than it used to be, because of people like you, PP.

It also makes you less of a tight-ass, which is something you desperately need.

If you can focus long enough, read this: https://www.cdc.gov/marijuana/faqs/marijuana-addiction.html

Cool. Occasional pot use hasn't stopped me from:

- Graduating in the top 9% of my class from a top 20 research university
- Graduating with honors from a top 10 research university for grad school
- Getting my dream job
- Being promoted 4 times in that job in the last 8 years

It's just made the ride a little more fun. Sorry you've missed out.

Imagine what you could have accomplished if you hadn't smoked pot.

DP. What the hell will occasional pot use do to make you less intelligent?

You realize that the bottle of wine you have every night is just as bad, if not worse, then taking a puff of the good stuff. Not to mention, you alcoholics are ruining your lovers and brain cells.


But yeah, carry on attacking the successful person who smokes a bit of weed here and there.

And if you didn’t want it in DC, why did you vote for it???

Maybe if you didn't get high, you wouldn't be dead certain that the poster you are chatting with on an anonymous forum drinks a bottle of wine a night (wrong) and is an alcoholic (wrong) who is ruining her brain cells (wrong) and her lover (maybe or maybe not; am I ruining my lover with alcohol or with love?). Also I don't live or vote in dc. But keep shouting at that person. I agree whoever she is, she deserves it.

If you don’t live or vote in DC, why do you give a shit??! LMAO

Go back to the Virginia suburbs of Arlington and stay there.

LOL, wrong again. You are a stoner laughing your ass off at a phantom. Typical.

Regardless of where you live, you made it clear you don't live or vote in DC, and yet you're mouthing off on a thread about pot smoking in DC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's the smell of low class.

This. Sorry, but it will never be anything else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amusing to me how if this were cigarette smoke odor instead of weed, everyone on this forum would be up in arms over it. But since it's pot smoke, the same people who would be outraged were it cigarettes, are totally fine with it.

The hypocrisy here is literally boundless.

Liberal logic

I'm liberal and I am against smoking pot. I assume many others who post that the smell is disgusting are also liberals. Liberals don't vote in lock step. You are a turd PP and your attitude is ruining our country.

You assume others are liberal? Because you are ?
And you know this ? Liberal wizard in action. Just because you are and people you may know doesn’t make the whoouniverse
Based on you.

Uh, the poster was claiming liberals voted in pot use and are now complaining about it. I was pointing out that not all liberals support pot use, by using myself as an example. Yes, I assume others are like me.

Keep up, PP. It's not that difficult.

+1. I’m OP and I’m liberal. I’m not against all pot use, just when I’m, say, riding metro to (my 6-figure, since it seems to matter) job in the morning.

This is not hard, get with the program.

As long as you live in DC, you have to deal with it. Just because you are bragging about metroing to your six-figure job, doesn’t mean everyone else cares about that.

It bothering you that much? Buy a car. Problem solved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So our pot smoking friends here:
- never knew that some get addicted
- think those smokers outside the metro and convention center every day are “occasional” smokers
- don’t get that posting on DCUM is a waste of time on that alleged 6-figure salary.

Stoned dumbasses.

Apparently our tight-ass non-pot smoking friends:

- Can't read because no one said that NO ONE gets addicted to pot. Just that most don't, which is true.

- Make massive assumptions about people they see smoking.

- Judge people for being on the exact same fking website they're on.

Illogical hypocrites.

Oops.

— 11:14 said nobody gets addicted to pot.
— unlike you (making assumptions that we’re making assumptions), we aren’t making assumptions about anything. Other than, you know, that 10% of pot smokers are addicted, which is actually backed by science and so it’s not, you know, an “assumption.”
— We aren’t boasting about our salaries, you have no clue if we’re SAHMs or retired, so you can’t judge us. You gotta admit, the pp boasting about her salary was kinda asking for it....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amusing to me how if this were cigarette smoke odor instead of weed, everyone on this forum would be up in arms over it. But since it's pot smoke, the same people who would be outraged were it cigarettes, are totally fine with it.

The hypocrisy here is literally boundless.

Liberal logic

I'm liberal and I am against smoking pot. I assume many others who post that the smell is disgusting are also liberals. Liberals don't vote in lock step. You are a turd PP and your attitude is ruining our country.

You assume others are liberal? Because you are ?
And you know this ? Liberal wizard in action. Just because you are and people you may know doesn’t make the whoouniverse
Based on you.

Uh, the poster was claiming liberals voted in pot use and are now complaining about it. I was pointing out that not all liberals support pot use, by using myself as an example. Yes, I assume others are like me.

Keep up, PP. It's not that difficult.

+1. I’m OP and I’m liberal. I’m not against all pot use, just when I’m, say, riding metro to (my 6-figure, since it seems to matter) job in the morning.

This is not hard, get with the program.

As long as you live in DC, you have to deal with it. Just because you are bragging about metroing to your six-figure job, doesn’t mean everyone else cares about that.

It bothering you that much? Buy a car. Problem solved.

Wreck the environment. Problem solved—by a climate-denying, stoned conservative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So our pot smoking friends here:
- never knew that some get addicted
- think those smokers outside the metro and convention center every day are “occasional” smokers
- don’t get that posting on DCUM is a waste of time on that alleged 6-figure salary.

Stoned dumbasses.

Apparently our tight-ass non-pot smoking friends:

- Can't read because no one said that NO ONE gets addicted to pot. Just that most don't, which is true.

- Make massive assumptions about people they see smoking.

- Judge people for being on the exact same fking website they're on.

Illogical hypocrites.

Oops.

— 11:14 said nobody gets addicted to pot.
— unlike you (making assumptions that we’re making assumptions), we aren’t making assumptions about anything. Other than, you know, that 10% of pot smokers are addicted, which is actually backed by science and so it’s not, you know, an “assumption.”
— We aren’t boasting about our salaries, you have no clue if we’re SAHMs or retired, so you can’t judge us. You gotta admit, the pp boasting about her salary was kinda asking for it....

Ok, so ONE person said no one gets addicted to pot. You realize 10% getting addicted means the vast majority don't, right? But sure -- keep on harping on that 10%.

The reason salaries started coming up was because of the sanctimonious ass who talked about pot making people stupid, and how he/she likes "being the smartest person in the room."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amusing to me how if this were cigarette smoke odor instead of weed, everyone on this forum would be up in arms over it. But since it's pot smoke, the same people who would be outraged were it cigarettes, are totally fine with it.

The hypocrisy here is literally boundless.

Liberal logic

I'm liberal and I am against smoking pot. I assume many others who post that the smell is disgusting are also liberals. Liberals don't vote in lock step. You are a turd PP and your attitude is ruining our country.

You assume others are liberal? Because you are ?
And you know this ? Liberal wizard in action. Just because you are and people you may know doesn’t make the whoouniverse
Based on you.

Uh, the poster was claiming liberals voted in pot use and are now complaining about it. I was pointing out that not all liberals support pot use, by using myself as an example. Yes, I assume others are like me.

Keep up, PP. It's not that difficult.

+1. I’m OP and I’m liberal. I’m not against all pot use, just when I’m, say, riding metro to (my 6-figure, since it seems to matter) job in the morning.

This is not hard, get with the program.

As long as you live in DC, you have to deal with it. Just because you are bragging about metroing to your six-figure job, doesn’t mean everyone else cares about that.

It bothering you that much? Buy a car. Problem solved.

Wreck the environment. Problem solved—by a climate-denying, stoned conservative.

Stoned conservative? Conservatives don't smoke pot. They think it's the devil's plant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I live just off of U Street, love the smell of weed -- and, yes, I'll smoke it in public. It's a great think. Tight asses!

+100

Going by the public smokers here, this isn’t exactly something to aspire to. You both seem like immature losers bragging about non-existent jobs.

Ha ha, you wish. I retired early and have $5 million in investments and live in a $1.5 million rowhome in Logan/U Street. I'm having the time of my life!

What BS. But we’d expect nothing less from you, given your behavior here so far!

Also, if DCUM is the “time of your life” that’s pretty pathetic, just saying....