Do you think Megan is expecting again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmm, I believe Meghan is telling us something.

She was twelve-weeks pregnant on the Australia tour while wearing the same dress.



(And for you haters who says she's not gorgeous, put some glasses on)

She looks fantastic in that dress.

She looks better in that dress this year than she did last year. But how is she breastfeeding when her chest is exactly the same size as it was then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am fairly certain if I had her resources I would have still been 20 pounds overweight at 4 mo PP. I say this because I had enough resources (I had enough money to buy good clean food (and did), I had access to childcare so I could go to the gym (and did...daily!), I had access to enough sleep thanks to DH (and slept!) but honestly my body was not budging. She's also not young! I have had babies at 28, 32, and 36. OMG 36 is a completely different game than 28! Age matters. It will take her time@

Amen! I'm around her age and six months PP. The struggle is real, not matter your resources. Your hormones are shifting and for many people that means holding onto weight like never experienced before, despite your best efforts. She is a beautiful woman and I love that she didn't hide in a cave until she returned to her previous weight. There are days I'd like to hide in a cave and I am not followed by photographers everywhere I go! A great example for all of us to give our bodies grace after a period of such change.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A girl, I want a girl. I'd settle for twins though.

Even better, twin girls!

I'm shallow but if its twins, I want a girl AND a boy.

Best of both worlds and good for Archie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmm, I believe Meghan is telling us something.

She was twelve-weeks pregnant on the Australia tour while wearing the same dress.



(And for you haters who says she's not gorgeous, put some glasses on)

She looks fantastic in that dress.

She looks better in that dress this year than she did last year. But how is she breastfeeding when her chest is exactly the same size as it was then?

Huh? They are noticeably larger! Not everyone gets giant porno boobs while nursing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmm, I believe Meghan is telling us something.

She was twelve-weeks pregnant on the Australia tour while wearing the same dress.



(And for you haters who says she's not gorgeous, put some glasses on)

She looks fantastic in that dress.

She looks better in that dress this year than she did last year. But how is she breastfeeding when her chest is exactly the same size as it was then?

Huh? They are noticeably larger! Not everyone gets giant porno boobs while nursing.

She was pregnant in the first picture, so her boobs would have already gotten somewhat larger.

[Anonymous]

*sigh* No new baby.

“Our plate is full with a 5-month-old at the moment — so busy,” the royal mom, 38, shared with locals.

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-says-theyre-so-busy-with-baby-archie-our-plate-is-full/

[Anonymous]

Maybe she is breastfeeding and ravenous and doesn't give a damn about losing weight?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe she is breastfeeding and ravenous and doesn't give a damn about losing weight?

Yes, yes, we know. She's so above wanting to be her pre-baby size.

[Anonymous]

I don’t think she’s expecting but I bet they’ll start trying when she gets back from this tour. Although Harry did say he wanted no more than two kids, so maybe they feel they have a little time?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A girl, I want a girl. I'd settle for twins though.

Even better, twin girls!

I'm shallow but if its twins, I want a girl AND a boy.

Best of both worlds and good for Archie.

No! Twin girls are good for us...and Archie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hmm, I believe Meghan is telling us something.

She was twelve-weeks pregnant on the Australia tour while wearing the same dress.

The body language from both of them in the second pic could not speak any more loudly. It’s made more obvious when compared to the first pic. Yikes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hmm, I believe Meghan is telling us something.

She was twelve-weeks pregnant on the Australia tour while wearing the same dress.

The body language from both of them in the second pic could not speak any more loudly. It’s made more obvious when compared to the first pic. Yikes.

That dress is way too tight on her. It was tight last year, even tighter now. Too bad, it's an otherwise very flattering dress and look on her. This is one thing I don't get about her - sometimes I wonder if she knows how to size clothes properly - her wedding dress, for example was at least 1 size too large. The second wedding dress - I'll admit - was perfection. What she wore at Eugenie's wedding was also way too large. She wore a maternity dress suitable to someone who is 7 months pregnant, and she was barely showing.

[Anonymous]

And no one comments on Harry's beater shoes. He must buy them used because they always look worn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe she is breastfeeding and ravenous and doesn't give a damn about losing weight?

Yes, yes, we know. She's so above wanting to be her pre-baby size.

Actually it seems like she’s above YOU wanting her to be her pre-baby size. Not everyone feels the need to look exactly the same 4 months after having a baby as they did before they got pregnant.

[Anonymous]

She is so beautiful!!!!